<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbotime &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Hmm thats weird isnt the inline pro manifold almost identical to the DRAG except it has the wastegate on the collector instead of the #1 runner?</TD></TR></TABLE>


NO! The InlinePro is very very similar to the Rec Hard manifold BUT the wg is on center on the manifold. The Rev Hard is a better design than the DRAG mani and I feel the InlinePro is better designed than the Rev Hard.

 

i actually dont have the DRAG I have the Revhard (or is it blox?) but they are almost identical, the revhard has bigger runners and a more open collector than the DRAG but I would think the exhaust pressure in the Rev is pretty similar to the DRAG....which would alos make the inline see similar pressure no?

DRAG


Revhard or BLOX im not quite sure which this is

 

BLOX

 

blox looks better than the revhard and the drag!

But can you see how the revhard is very very similar to the drag? I dont understand how the inline pro (which is almost the same as revhard lest the wg placement) could flow much better?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbotime &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">But can you see how the revhard is very very similar to the drag? I dont understand how the inline pro (which is almost the same as revhard lest the wg placement) could flow much better?</TD></TR></TABLE>

As far as flowing goes the rev hard and IP are very close if not the same. The drag has smaller runners and more restriction inside. The drag manifolds W/G placement is horrible and will kill your engine in the long run. The pressure on the #4 cyl is horrible! I just did a compression test on my friends ls and he has had a drag kit on there for 2+ years. The #'s were 80-159-168-178! 80 being the #4 cyl. furthest away from the W/G. Notice the cyl. closest to the W/G is it tip top shape. Time for new rings. lol

 

Like Tony said, different setups reacts differently to ctr cams... Most people that use gsr cams made high whp #s but tq#s are ok... With ctr cams you might get high whp #s and tq#s... I made 527whp400tq@22psi sc61 on ctr cams on a fully built itr motor...

Then to compare, Huy from InlineRacing had a stock JDM ITR motor on boost with JUN3 cams to dick around... Those JUN3s did pretty damn good. Shocked the heck out of me... So he then put his stock itr/ctr cams back in and redynoed just to compare for himself and made just a tad less whp but gained alot on the tq...

So all in all, just try out the cams and see how it does on your setup. If you dont like it then put some gsr cams in and see how that works out if you have them laying around...

Goodluck on your quest for boost power!!!