another h22 dyno chart
06-28-2008, 02:35 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: k20 eater, k20, k20 eater
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
another h22 dyno chart
I am getting the dyno sheet emailed to me and i will post it as soon as i get it but we made 280 and 180.
H22a4 block sleeved and bored to 89 mm
Je 13.0 - 1 pistons
crower maxi light rods
twm 50 mm itbs
kazikan balance shaft removal kit
port flow head
crane vtec elimantor cams
ferrea followers
Looking at aem coil packs and piecing a dry sump for the motor
H22a4 block sleeved and bored to 89 mm
Je 13.0 - 1 pistons
crower maxi light rods
twm 50 mm itbs
kazikan balance shaft removal kit
port flow head
crane vtec elimantor cams
ferrea followers
Looking at aem coil packs and piecing a dry sump for the motor
06-28-2008, 09:46 PM
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SOCAL, ca, 91702
Posts: 3,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: another h22 dyno chart (SIXTY)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SIXTY »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">tq seems low for 280, i made 190 tq with only 240 whp.</TD></TR></TABLE>
torque #'s do seem quite low.
torque #'s do seem quite low.
Trending Topics
07-02-2008, 05:35 AM
#9
King of the One Liners
Re: (lengualoco21)
Well since you have access to VP stuff-
Try C14 plus . Its still oxygenated, its a lighter fuel and burns cooler.
I planned on doing a comparison between q16 and c14plus just to see what would happen
Try C14 plus . Its still oxygenated, its a lighter fuel and burns cooler.
I planned on doing a comparison between q16 and c14plus just to see what would happen
07-02-2008, 04:41 PM
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (2fastGSR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2fastGSR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well since you have access to VP stuff-
Try C14 plus . Its still oxygenated, its a lighter fuel and burns cooler.
I planned on doing a comparison between q16 and c14plus just to see what would happen</TD></TR></TABLE>
C14+
Try C14 plus . Its still oxygenated, its a lighter fuel and burns cooler.
I planned on doing a comparison between q16 and c14plus just to see what would happen</TD></TR></TABLE>
C14+
07-03-2008, 06:06 AM
#12
King of the One Liners
Re: (FST GSR 1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FST GSR 1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">C16 </TD></TR></TABLE>
Care to explain why?
This is directly from a VP rep's mouth:
C16 is not really intended for naturally aspirated applications. While it may work well with some extremely high compression, large displacement motors , it was not really intended for naturally aspirated import applications. Turbo motors are another story.
It is too heavy of a fuel and is un oxygenated. An oxygenated fuel such as q16 or c14+ will always yield better results.
But hey thats just what VP themselves say. Maybe they are wrong
</TD></TR></TABLE>Care to explain why?
This is directly from a VP rep's mouth:
C16 is not really intended for naturally aspirated applications. While it may work well with some extremely high compression, large displacement motors , it was not really intended for naturally aspirated import applications. Turbo motors are another story.
It is too heavy of a fuel and is un oxygenated. An oxygenated fuel such as q16 or c14+ will always yield better results.
But hey thats just what VP themselves say. Maybe they are wrong
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jnv255
Forced Induction
46
12-19-2011 03:25 PM
