95/2000 ls differences?
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
95/2000 ls differences?
I'm considering buying a 2000 LS, what exactly are the differences between some of the older and newer ls's? I know the whole obd 1/2 thing, but other then that? Performance wise, is there much of a difference?
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
From: columbus, ohio, usa
Re: 95/2000 ls differences? (Sarren)
the diff between a 95 and a 2000 is mostley exterior and interior than performance. The diff in exterior is the bumpers, headlights are a little smaller on the 95, taillights, wheels(2000 have 15nch mesh wheels and the 95 have 14nch hub caps) 95 has the trunk release inside the car and the 2000 have the trunk release lever in the rear of the car. Just little stuff like that. The motor is the exact same(except valve cover is diff).
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Re: 95/2000 ls differences? (boost fed ls)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boost fed ls »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the diff between a 95 and a 2000 is mostley exterior and interior than performance. The diff in exterior is the bumpers, headlights are a little smaller on the 95, taillights, wheels(2000 have 15nch mesh wheels and the 95 have 14nch hub caps) 95 has the trunk release inside the car and the 2000 have the trunk release lever in the rear of the car. Just little stuff like that. The motor is the exact same(except valve cover is diff).</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well the sensors on the motor is different.
2000 is OBD-II
1995 is OBD-I
Well the sensors on the motor is different.
2000 is OBD-II
1995 is OBD-I
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
From: columbus, ohio, usa
Re: 95/2000 ls differences? (zilverz)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by zilverz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Well the sensors on the motor is different.
2000 is OBD-II
1995 is OBD-I
</TD></TR></TABLE>
as stated in the org. post
Well the sensors on the motor is different.
2000 is OBD-II
1995 is OBD-I
</TD></TR></TABLE>
as stated in the org. post
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Re: 95/2000 ls differences? (boost fed ls)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boost fed ls »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
as stated in the org. post</TD></TR></TABLE>
To be honest, I did miss that in the original posting, OBDI/II.
But that is about the only performance difference I know of. the On Board Diagnostics and how the ECU reacts to its readings.
as stated in the org. post</TD></TR></TABLE>
To be honest, I did miss that in the original posting, OBDI/II.
But that is about the only performance difference I know of. the On Board Diagnostics and how the ECU reacts to its readings.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 1
From: ca
Re: 95/2000 ls differences? (ernald711)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ernald711 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i read that if you beefed up both motors the same way the 95'll take out the 2000. forgot where i read that....</TD></TR></TABLE>
I don't think there's that much of a difference, but the obdII does hold it back a little bit. ODB II is more sensitive and OBD I responds easier to the mods
I don't think there's that much of a difference, but the obdII does hold it back a little bit. ODB II is more sensitive and OBD I responds easier to the mods
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,778
Likes: 1
From: BeaveRun, PA, USA
Re: 95/2000 ls differences? (ernald711)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ernald711 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i read that if you beefed up both motors the same way the 95'll take out the 2000. forgot where i read that....</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yet another person that seems to believe all that they read...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by aeon »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I don't think there's that much of a difference, but the obdII does hold it back a little bit. ODB II is more sensitive and OBD I responds easier to the mods
</TD></TR></TABLE>
And you still believe that there is an advantage with OBDI over OBDII?
Anyways...back to the original thread starter...
There is a 2 hp difference in the 95 and 2000ls engine ratings. The 95 is rated at 140, and the 2000 is rated at 142. It's not going to make or break you.
The front and rear fascia's are different, the mirrors are different, and the 2000 probably comes with GS-R wheels. Not to mention the 2000 has the immobilizer built into the ECU. Off the top of my head, that's all I can think of.
Yet another person that seems to believe all that they read...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by aeon »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I don't think there's that much of a difference, but the obdII does hold it back a little bit. ODB II is more sensitive and OBD I responds easier to the mods
</TD></TR></TABLE>
And you still believe that there is an advantage with OBDI over OBDII?
Anyways...back to the original thread starter...
There is a 2 hp difference in the 95 and 2000ls engine ratings. The 95 is rated at 140, and the 2000 is rated at 142. It's not going to make or break you.
The front and rear fascia's are different, the mirrors are different, and the 2000 probably comes with GS-R wheels. Not to mention the 2000 has the immobilizer built into the ECU. Off the top of my head, that's all I can think of.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: orlando, florida, usa
Re: 95/2000 ls differences? (ScreaminTeg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ScreaminTeg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
There is a 2 hp difference in the 95 and 2000ls engine ratings. The 95 is rated at 140, and the 2000 is rated at 142. It's not going to make or break you.</TD></TR></TABLE>
No i read the specs of a 95 teg ls "like mine" and it stated that the b18b had 142hp.
no matter what year.
There is a 2 hp difference in the 95 and 2000ls engine ratings. The 95 is rated at 140, and the 2000 is rated at 142. It's not going to make or break you.</TD></TR></TABLE>
No i read the specs of a 95 teg ls "like mine" and it stated that the b18b had 142hp.
no matter what year.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,778
Likes: 1
From: BeaveRun, PA, USA
Re: 95/2000 ls differences? (95teggyls)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 95teggyls »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
No i read the specs of a 95 teg ls "like mine" and it stated that the b18b had 142hp.
no matter what year.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Could be...maybe I was thinking of the B18A1...but I thought that was 130...either way...It doesn't make a big difference.
No i read the specs of a 95 teg ls "like mine" and it stated that the b18b had 142hp.
no matter what year.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Could be...maybe I was thinking of the B18A1...but I thought that was 130...either way...It doesn't make a big difference.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
Re: 95/2000 ls differences? (ScreaminTeg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ScreaminTeg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Could be...maybe I was thinking of the B18A1...but I thought that was 130...either way...It doesn't make a big difference.</TD></TR></TABLE>
No the B18A is 140hp
the ZC is 130hp
Could be...maybe I was thinking of the B18A1...but I thought that was 130...either way...It doesn't make a big difference.</TD></TR></TABLE>
No the B18A is 140hp
the ZC is 130hp
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
