Turbo vs. Supercharger
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Elgin, SC, USA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbo vs. Supercharger
I am looking to go forced induction on my '03 type s but can't decide weither to go Turbo or Supercharger. I have already decided I am going to upgrade the valve train, and break down the engine and check the rest of the internals for wear and a full exhaust will complement either one. This is still going to be my daily driver for a little while but it will also be a weekend warrior for cuircit and autocross. Either way it will also have a k-pro doing all of the thinking for it. I am looking for input from people who have or know people that have a turbo or supercharger installed already and how they like it plus the pros and cons.
#2
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Die Thieves, NJ, 07456
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Turbo vs. Supercharger (k20tuner)
Daily Driver, Circuit and Autocross = Supercharger
Smooth linear powerband and almost instaneous throttle response. Turbo is going to have lag even with a properly sized turbo. The small *** Greddy turbo that can barely break 300hp still has some lag. The supercharger is capable of over 10 psi and will complement your daily driver and autocross car perfectly IMO.
Turbo is not for everybody and it seems your more interested in autocross than big numbers and the 1320.
Smooth linear powerband and almost instaneous throttle response. Turbo is going to have lag even with a properly sized turbo. The small *** Greddy turbo that can barely break 300hp still has some lag. The supercharger is capable of over 10 psi and will complement your daily driver and autocross car perfectly IMO.
Turbo is not for everybody and it seems your more interested in autocross than big numbers and the 1320.
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Slapping criminals, New York
Posts: 3,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Turbo vs. Supercharger (NJslvrtypes)
Wow this has been beaten to death sooooo many times.
S/C is perfect for daily driving. It has a linear power curve etc.
Turbo can be good daily driven also. Power comes on as a sudden surge usually unless its a very small turbo.
DO a little research.
S/C is perfect for daily driving. It has a linear power curve etc.
Turbo can be good daily driven also. Power comes on as a sudden surge usually unless its a very small turbo.
DO a little research.
#4
Member
Re: Turbo vs. Supercharger (NJslvrtypes)
I have been in a bunch of fi Honda's and with out a doubt I would prefer supercharging for a DD. As posted above a well tuned supercharger will give you reliable, linear, quiet, usable horsepower. If you had a dedicated track car or wanted to make a dyno queen, you may want to consider a turbo, but if you have to drive this car everyday, then supercharging is the way to go.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Elgin, SC, USA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Turbo vs. Supercharger (cnyej1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cnyej1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Wow this has been beaten to death sooooo many times.
S/C is perfect for daily driving. It has a linear power curve etc.
Turbo can be good daily driven also. Power comes on as a sudden surge usually unless its a very small turbo.
DO a little research. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I have done the research and I know what the difference is in numbers. I'm looking for input from experience which can be 2 different things.
Well it looks like Supercharger is the way to go. Thank you for the input confirming my doubts about which one to use. If anybody has one installed or knows someone could you drop some input as far as mantinence and easyness to work on. Also things like installation time and difficulty.
S/C is perfect for daily driving. It has a linear power curve etc.
Turbo can be good daily driven also. Power comes on as a sudden surge usually unless its a very small turbo.
DO a little research. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I have done the research and I know what the difference is in numbers. I'm looking for input from experience which can be 2 different things.
Well it looks like Supercharger is the way to go. Thank you for the input confirming my doubts about which one to use. If anybody has one installed or knows someone could you drop some input as far as mantinence and easyness to work on. Also things like installation time and difficulty.
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Slapping criminals, New York
Posts: 3,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Turbo vs. Supercharger (k20tuner)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by k20tuner »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I have done the research and I know what the difference is in numbers. I'm looking for input from experience which can be 2 different things.
Well it looks like Supercharger is the way to go. Thank you for the input confirming my doubts about which one to use. If anybody has one installed or knows someone could you drop some input as far as maintenance and easyness to work on. Also things like installation time and difficulty.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have had a JRSC on a Honda..... no maintenance at all..... cant say about time to install, I pulled my motor completely out and did timing belt and waterpump, and a few other things. But I had all that done in about 12 hrs.
I have done the research and I know what the difference is in numbers. I'm looking for input from experience which can be 2 different things.
Well it looks like Supercharger is the way to go. Thank you for the input confirming my doubts about which one to use. If anybody has one installed or knows someone could you drop some input as far as maintenance and easyness to work on. Also things like installation time and difficulty.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have had a JRSC on a Honda..... no maintenance at all..... cant say about time to install, I pulled my motor completely out and did timing belt and waterpump, and a few other things. But I had all that done in about 12 hrs.
Trending Topics
#8
Re: Turbo vs. Supercharger (k20tuner)
Dont supercharge a 4 cyclinder caR. Your going to want more power, and the supercharger isnt going to give you the more power you want. The same psi on a turbo gives more power then it would on a supercharger. Supercharger belongs on 6 cylinders and up, where they can afford to loose a little bite of power...
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Elgin, SC, USA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Turbo vs. Supercharger (SiR99)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SiR99 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Dont supercharge a 4 cyclinder caR. Your going to want more power, and the supercharger isnt going to give you the more power you want. The same psi on a turbo gives more power then it would on a supercharger. Supercharger belongs on 6 cylinders and up, where they can afford to loose a little bite of power...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Jackson racing claims that with there set up and a k-pro that the RSX S can make 250 Hp to the wheels which is plenty for my purposes. I do know a guy with a turbo with the "more power" that you're talking about and he doesn't have traction untill 3rd gear. After all of the posts it sounds like a SC is for me.
P.S. They claim 280 with a pulley upgrade. Some times it's not about maximum power but about the optimal power for the entire set up.
Jackson racing claims that with there set up and a k-pro that the RSX S can make 250 Hp to the wheels which is plenty for my purposes. I do know a guy with a turbo with the "more power" that you're talking about and he doesn't have traction untill 3rd gear. After all of the posts it sounds like a SC is for me.
P.S. They claim 280 with a pulley upgrade. Some times it's not about maximum power but about the optimal power for the entire set up.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Elgin, SC, USA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (k20kev)
But Turbo creates more heat and lags no matter what. I want instant power with out baking my engine compartment and I really don't feel like putting in an intercooler.
#12
I've got a turbo dc5 and I can tell you its fantastic. I love it and its potential.
Now I can also tell you I hate it. One loose screw will kill your weekend trying to find out why you're not boosting. Plus just the inherent issues of boosting your car. It's great in a line, but doesn't give much to turns and such. Uphill is a fun run now though.
Would I do it again? Boost, yes, turbo.. probably not. I'm not after big power though. I just more power. So I would probably go with Comptech SC. It's one brand the dealer will install and actually ads value to the car since you can buy it from some dealers too. ... I'd probably try and prototype a bigger pulley or something, but still But damn I'd miss the sound of spooling up a turbo...
Now I can also tell you I hate it. One loose screw will kill your weekend trying to find out why you're not boosting. Plus just the inherent issues of boosting your car. It's great in a line, but doesn't give much to turns and such. Uphill is a fun run now though.
Would I do it again? Boost, yes, turbo.. probably not. I'm not after big power though. I just more power. So I would probably go with Comptech SC. It's one brand the dealer will install and actually ads value to the car since you can buy it from some dealers too. ... I'd probably try and prototype a bigger pulley or something, but still But damn I'd miss the sound of spooling up a turbo...
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Unspoken, Destination Unknown
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Turbo vs. Supercharger
Superchargers are slightly easier to install...not as much labor...but you'll likely never be satisfied with the power they give you...sure they will basically give you instant boost but they aren't as efficient and they don't have nearly the potential as you would get if you turbo it...build the motor to your fancy, turbo it, and make sure to get Kpro...can't go wrong with that...just my opinion.
#20
Re: (k20kev)
edit: just wana say that i'm talking about intake air temperature, not the underhood temp. with either one underhood temps shouldn't be high enough to damage anything unless you're running like 800 hp.
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: A-town son, Illinois
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Turbo vs. Supercharger
right now i'm running a jrsc on my 98 gsr. And i've had no problems whatsoever, running 8psi. So i'm upgrading to a 3.8 nos pulley, a b20 crank pulley, changin the belts, rc440 injectors. Tuned to hondata s300. From there gonna call up motovations motorsports, and get there stepper pulley. Finally goin for the Lht intercooler. It's foolproof. I can drive it around and take deliveries at work durring the week. And rapin some douchers and there beater civics on the weekends. I'ld say for what i'm goin for definitaly go supercharged.
But runnin high boost (11-12 or more ) you must cool the engine or you'll be shootin flames from the exhaust.
Lht makes an intercooler it's over $1000 and if you don't live in florida you have to send your sc to them and they'll do their stuff lowering engine temps up to 100+ plus degrees while knockin up the hp by almost 30.
Option 2: you can go water/methanol injection. I don't know much about it, but i've heard it's mainly for turbos so don't quote me it is an option though.
option 3:nitrous oxide. You can run a wet shot through the blower maybe a 75 shot something like that. But i have heard that it breaks down the fan and really f**cks that up. If thats the case go direct port i've heard it better distributes the shot to all 4 cylinders.
But in my personal advice i say go ***** out have lht fix ya up and get it intercooled, then from there, a zex wet 75 shot. Direct port. Get a good tune hondata (s300) reccomended. And tune it so the Nitrous will shoot at a certain RPM. Now i'm not sure the full hp level with a setup as such but i'm guessing (don't quote) 350-400 hp. kinda off topic but that's the way to go if you want a supercharger. If your goin turbo i'm not the guy to ask.
Besides do your own damn research
But runnin high boost (11-12 or more ) you must cool the engine or you'll be shootin flames from the exhaust.
Lht makes an intercooler it's over $1000 and if you don't live in florida you have to send your sc to them and they'll do their stuff lowering engine temps up to 100+ plus degrees while knockin up the hp by almost 30.
Option 2: you can go water/methanol injection. I don't know much about it, but i've heard it's mainly for turbos so don't quote me it is an option though.
option 3:nitrous oxide. You can run a wet shot through the blower maybe a 75 shot something like that. But i have heard that it breaks down the fan and really f**cks that up. If thats the case go direct port i've heard it better distributes the shot to all 4 cylinders.
But in my personal advice i say go ***** out have lht fix ya up and get it intercooled, then from there, a zex wet 75 shot. Direct port. Get a good tune hondata (s300) reccomended. And tune it so the Nitrous will shoot at a certain RPM. Now i'm not sure the full hp level with a setup as such but i'm guessing (don't quote) 350-400 hp. kinda off topic but that's the way to go if you want a supercharger. If your goin turbo i'm not the guy to ask.
Besides do your own damn research
#23
Man U FTW
Re: Turbo vs. Supercharger
Read through the FI FAQ. It will answer this question for you. If you're not satisfied with the advice in the FAQ, ask this in the Forced Induction forum...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Azcheron
Honda S2000
16
03-25-2007 11:40 AM