is it realy worth the t04s cover over the to4e for an extra 100$ ?
thx

 

ttt

 

to4e cover for stock displacement
to4s cover to support more air flow (2.1L+)
the to4e actually stays efficient at high boost levels
the to4s is most efficient at moderate boost levels
ask around
i would choose the to4e over the to4s any day for a 1.8L

 

nice info there

 

if you want anything 400+ i would go t4s housing then t4e

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Quick 200k Mile Motor &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">to4e cover for stock displacement
the to4e actually stays efficient at high boost levels
the to4s is most efficient at moderate boost levels
ask around
i would choose the to4e over the to4s any day for a 1.8L </TD></TR></TABLE>

by the way t4s is more efficient at higher boost level than t4e

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by speeds &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if you want anything 400+ i would go t4s housing then t4e </TD></TR></TABLE>

Damn, so you mean I'll never hit 400+..............****, hey Art I want my money back.

Whatever happened to the Newbie Forum that used to be on h-t? We need it back again.

 

500hp has already been done with a t04e housing at 19psi. Nuff said.

art

 

I was kidding, guess i forgot the or the

 

so you guy tell that at 20 psi t4e make more power than t4s?

 

so t04s or t04e for 500whp+on a 1.8?
need more input

 

do a search, here are some results of the following,

484 @ 19psi
450 @ 20 psi
374 @ 9 psi

all on 1.9L -2.0L on T04E housing...

stan

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Flamenco-T &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">do a search, here are some results of the following,

484 @ 19psi
450 @ 20 psi
374 @ 9 psi

all on 1.9L -2.0L on T04E housing...

stan</TD></TR></TABLE>
I am gonna sue you for posting this misinfo!!!!!!!! J/K Lighten up!

 

Just call Precision up and ask them or Art. Precision states they have no data so far proving the T04S flows more. They are unsure of Turbonetics claims that the 60-1 flows 10% more than the 60-1 Hifi which is a T04E housing

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Flamenco-T &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
374 @ 9 psi
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Actually that # was on an S housing.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nouseforaname &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Actually that # was on an S housing. </TD></TR></TABLE>

okay, so I got 2 out of 3 LOL

stan

 

go to this website. http://www.turbocharged.com/ca....html

 

A TS04 is a turbo.
A T04S is a compressor housing.(70AR)

art

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Arturbo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A TS04 is a turbo.
A T04S is a compressor housing.(70AR)

art</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ima sue you for posting misinfo! J/K Art j/k! Art please make a post explaining all the diff housing and trims and wheels , also A/R diff between T3 and T4 etc etc. There have been alot of redundant posts asking the same thing. We need a good reference. Art, FFgeoff, tony1, ME? We could compile something. Oh yeah Rod from Precision.

 

Ive done that already. I just made a post on the other thread about it too.

art

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
by the way t4s is more efficient at higher boost level than t4e</TD></TR></TABLE>

wrong..
80% efficiency range on the SC61 T04S cover is from 26 lb/min to 44 lb/min
but it will support up to 65 lb/min. Its only 80%+ efficient from 7psi to 18psi.

Theres no info on the T04E .60 a/r cover.
But since SC61's use the GT40 compressor wheel..
it should be in between the GT40 .70 a/r & GT40 .58 a/r
The SC61 T04S is basically the GT40 .70


As you can see.. the GT40 .58 a/r supports less flow (less displacement) but remains efficient at higher boost levels. The T04E .60 cover would do near the same. T04E


Modified by Quick 200k Mile Motor at 10:22 PM 7/3/2003


Modified by Quick 200k Mile Motor at 10:37 PM 7/3/2003

 

um, i thought the sc61 was a 56 trim...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VaporTrail &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">um, i thought the sc61 was a 56 trim...</TD></TR></TABLE>
i knoe, i was just comparing housings .70a/r vs .60a/r (.72 vs .58)
i remember seeing in a thread the option to go with the lower trim wheel ..maybe?