sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NW, FL
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (sleeper007)
to4e cover for stock displacement
to4s cover to support more air flow (2.1L+)
the to4e actually stays efficient at high boost levels
the to4s is most efficient at moderate boost levels
ask around
i would choose the to4e over the to4s any day for a 1.8L
to4s cover to support more air flow (2.1L+)
the to4e actually stays efficient at high boost levels
the to4s is most efficient at moderate boost levels
ask around
i would choose the to4e over the to4s any day for a 1.8L
#6
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Quick 200k Mile Motor)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Quick 200k Mile Motor »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">to4e cover for stock displacement
the to4e actually stays efficient at high boost levels
the to4s is most efficient at moderate boost levels
ask around
i would choose the to4e over the to4s any day for a 1.8L </TD></TR></TABLE>
by the way t4s is more efficient at higher boost level than t4e
the to4e actually stays efficient at high boost levels
the to4s is most efficient at moderate boost levels
ask around
i would choose the to4e over the to4s any day for a 1.8L </TD></TR></TABLE>
by the way t4s is more efficient at higher boost level than t4e
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (speeds)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by speeds »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if you want anything 400+ i would go t4s housing then t4e </TD></TR></TABLE>
Damn, so you mean I'll never hit 400+..............****, hey Art I want my money back.
Whatever happened to the Newbie Forum that used to be on h-t? We need it back again.
Damn, so you mean I'll never hit 400+..............****, hey Art I want my money back.
Whatever happened to the Newbie Forum that used to be on h-t? We need it back again.
Trending Topics
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 6,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (sleeper007)
do a search, here are some results of the following,
484 @ 19psi
450 @ 20 psi
374 @ 9 psi
all on 1.9L -2.0L on T04E housing...
stan
484 @ 19psi
450 @ 20 psi
374 @ 9 psi
all on 1.9L -2.0L on T04E housing...
stan
#13
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Flamenco-T)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Flamenco-T »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">do a search, here are some results of the following,
484 @ 19psi
450 @ 20 psi
374 @ 9 psi
all on 1.9L -2.0L on T04E housing...
stan</TD></TR></TABLE>
I am gonna sue you for posting this misinfo!!!!!!!! J/K Lighten up!
484 @ 19psi
450 @ 20 psi
374 @ 9 psi
all on 1.9L -2.0L on T04E housing...
stan</TD></TR></TABLE>
I am gonna sue you for posting this misinfo!!!!!!!! J/K Lighten up!
#14
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Boostfed)
Just call Precision up and ask them or Art. Precision states they have no data so far proving the T04S flows more. They are unsure of Turbonetics claims that the 60-1 flows 10% more than the 60-1 Hifi which is a T04E housing
#15
Smarter than you
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Third Coast, united states
Posts: 8,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Flamenco-T)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Flamenco-T »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
374 @ 9 psi
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Actually that # was on an S housing.
374 @ 9 psi
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Actually that # was on an S housing.
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 6,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (nouseforaname)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nouseforaname »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Actually that # was on an S housing. </TD></TR></TABLE>
okay, so I got 2 out of 3 LOL
stan
Actually that # was on an S housing. </TD></TR></TABLE>
okay, so I got 2 out of 3 LOL
stan
#17
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Flamenco-T)
go to this website. http://www.turbocharged.com/ca....html
#19
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Arturbo)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Arturbo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A TS04 is a turbo.
A T04S is a compressor housing.(70AR)
art</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ima sue you for posting misinfo! J/K Art j/k! Art please make a post explaining all the diff housing and trims and wheels , also A/R diff between T3 and T4 etc etc. There have been alot of redundant posts asking the same thing. We need a good reference. Art, FFgeoff, tony1, ME? We could compile something. Oh yeah Rod from Precision.
A T04S is a compressor housing.(70AR)
art</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ima sue you for posting misinfo! J/K Art j/k! Art please make a post explaining all the diff housing and trims and wheels , also A/R diff between T3 and T4 etc etc. There have been alot of redundant posts asking the same thing. We need a good reference. Art, FFgeoff, tony1, ME? We could compile something. Oh yeah Rod from Precision.
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NW, FL
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (speeds)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
by the way t4s is more efficient at higher boost level than t4e</TD></TR></TABLE>
wrong..
80% efficiency range on the SC61 T04S cover is from 26 lb/min to 44 lb/min
but it will support up to 65 lb/min. Its only 80%+ efficient from 7psi to 18psi.
Theres no info on the T04E .60 a/r cover.
But since SC61's use the GT40 compressor wheel..
it should be in between the GT40 .70 a/r & GT40 .58 a/r
The SC61 T04S is basically the GT40 .70
As you can see.. the GT40 .58 a/r supports less flow (less displacement) but remains efficient at higher boost levels. The T04E .60 cover would do near the same. T04E
Modified by Quick 200k Mile Motor at 10:22 PM 7/3/2003
Modified by Quick 200k Mile Motor at 10:37 PM 7/3/2003
by the way t4s is more efficient at higher boost level than t4e</TD></TR></TABLE>
wrong..
80% efficiency range on the SC61 T04S cover is from 26 lb/min to 44 lb/min
but it will support up to 65 lb/min. Its only 80%+ efficient from 7psi to 18psi.
Theres no info on the T04E .60 a/r cover.
But since SC61's use the GT40 compressor wheel..
it should be in between the GT40 .70 a/r & GT40 .58 a/r
The SC61 T04S is basically the GT40 .70
As you can see.. the GT40 .58 a/r supports less flow (less displacement) but remains efficient at higher boost levels. The T04E .60 cover would do near the same. T04E
Modified by Quick 200k Mile Motor at 10:22 PM 7/3/2003
Modified by Quick 200k Mile Motor at 10:37 PM 7/3/2003
#23
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NW, FL
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (VaporTrail)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VaporTrail »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">um, i thought the sc61 was a 56 trim...</TD></TR></TABLE>
i knoe, i was just comparing housings .70a/r vs .60a/r (.72 vs .58)
i remember seeing in a thread the option to go with the lower trim wheel ..maybe?
i knoe, i was just comparing housings .70a/r vs .60a/r (.72 vs .58)
i remember seeing in a thread the option to go with the lower trim wheel ..maybe?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post