Notices

sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2003, 01:20 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
b18cTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover

is it realy worth the t04s cover over the to4e for an extra 100$ ?
thx
Old 07-02-2003, 02:52 PM
  #2  
Thread Starter
 
b18cTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (sleeper007)

ttt
Old 07-02-2003, 03:22 PM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Quick 200k Mile Motor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NW, FL
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (sleeper007)

to4e cover for stock displacement
to4s cover to support more air flow (2.1L+)
the to4e actually stays efficient at high boost levels
the to4s is most efficient at moderate boost levels
ask around
i would choose the to4e over the to4s any day for a 1.8L
Old 07-02-2003, 03:26 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
 
b18cTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Quick 200k Mile Motor)

nice info there
Old 07-02-2003, 05:50 PM
  #5  
Trial User
 
speeds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (sleeper007)

if you want anything 400+ i would go t4s housing then t4e
Old 07-02-2003, 05:53 PM
  #6  
Trial User
 
speeds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Quick 200k Mile Motor)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Quick 200k Mile Motor &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">to4e cover for stock displacement
the to4e actually stays efficient at high boost levels
the to4s is most efficient at moderate boost levels
ask around
i would choose the to4e over the to4s any day for a 1.8L </TD></TR></TABLE>

by the way t4s is more efficient at higher boost level than t4e
Old 07-02-2003, 05:54 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
93LSivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: All around, De/Pa
Posts: 5,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (speeds)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by speeds &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if you want anything 400+ i would go t4s housing then t4e </TD></TR></TABLE>

Damn, so you mean I'll never hit 400+..............****, hey Art I want my money back.

Whatever happened to the Newbie Forum that used to be on h-t? We need it back again.
Old 07-02-2003, 05:56 PM
  #8  
Better than steak
 
Arturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (93LSivic)

500hp has already been done with a t04e housing at 19psi. Nuff said.

art
Old 07-02-2003, 06:03 PM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
93LSivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: All around, De/Pa
Posts: 5,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Arturbo)

I was kidding, guess i forgot the or the
Old 07-02-2003, 06:04 PM
  #10  
Trial User
 
speeds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Arturbo)

so you guy tell that at 20 psi t4e make more power than t4s?
Old 07-02-2003, 06:07 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
 
b18cTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (speeds)

so t04s or t04e for 500whp+on a 1.8?
need more input
Old 07-02-2003, 06:09 PM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Flamenco-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 6,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (sleeper007)

do a search, here are some results of the following,

484 @ 19psi
450 @ 20 psi
374 @ 9 psi

all on 1.9L -2.0L on T04E housing...

stan
Old 07-02-2003, 06:10 PM
  #13  
New User
 
Boostfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Flamenco-T)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Flamenco-T &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">do a search, here are some results of the following,

484 @ 19psi
450 @ 20 psi
374 @ 9 psi

all on 1.9L -2.0L on T04E housing...

stan</TD></TR></TABLE>
I am gonna sue you for posting this misinfo!!!!!!!! J/K Lighten up!
Old 07-02-2003, 06:12 PM
  #14  
New User
 
Boostfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Boostfed)

Just call Precision up and ask them or Art. Precision states they have no data so far proving the T04S flows more. They are unsure of Turbonetics claims that the 60-1 flows 10% more than the 60-1 Hifi which is a T04E housing
Old 07-02-2003, 06:34 PM
  #15  
Smarter than you
iTrader: (1)
 
DIRep972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Third Coast, united states
Posts: 8,240
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Flamenco-T)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Flamenco-T &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
374 @ 9 psi
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Actually that # was on an S housing.
Old 07-02-2003, 06:40 PM
  #16  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Flamenco-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tejas
Posts: 6,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (nouseforaname)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nouseforaname &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Actually that # was on an S housing. </TD></TR></TABLE>

okay, so I got 2 out of 3 LOL

stan
Old 07-02-2003, 06:44 PM
  #17  
Trial User
 
speeds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Flamenco-T)

go to this website. http://www.turbocharged.com/ca....html
Old 07-02-2003, 08:42 PM
  #18  
Better than steak
 
Arturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (speeds)

A TS04 is a turbo.
A T04S is a compressor housing.(70AR)

art
Old 07-02-2003, 08:55 PM
  #19  
New User
 
Boostfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Arturbo)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Arturbo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A TS04 is a turbo.
A T04S is a compressor housing.(70AR)

art</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ima sue you for posting misinfo! J/K Art j/k! Art please make a post explaining all the diff housing and trims and wheels , also A/R diff between T3 and T4 etc etc. There have been alot of redundant posts asking the same thing. We need a good reference. Art, FFgeoff, tony1, ME? We could compile something. Oh yeah Rod from Precision.
Old 07-02-2003, 09:01 PM
  #20  
Better than steak
 
Arturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Boostfed)

Ive done that already. I just made a post on the other thread about it too.

art
Old 07-03-2003, 07:34 AM
  #21  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Quick 200k Mile Motor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NW, FL
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (speeds)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
by the way t4s is more efficient at higher boost level than t4e</TD></TR></TABLE>

wrong..
80% efficiency range on the SC61 T04S cover is from 26 lb/min to 44 lb/min
but it will support up to 65 lb/min. Its only 80%+ efficient from 7psi to 18psi.

Theres no info on the T04E .60 a/r cover.
But since SC61's use the GT40 compressor wheel..
it should be in between the GT40 .70 a/r & GT40 .58 a/r
The SC61 T04S is basically the GT40 .70


As you can see.. the GT40 .58 a/r supports less flow (less displacement) but remains efficient at higher boost levels. The T04E .60 cover would do near the same. T04E


Modified by Quick 200k Mile Motor at 10:22 PM 7/3/2003


Modified by Quick 200k Mile Motor at 10:37 PM 7/3/2003
Old 07-03-2003, 08:44 AM
  #22  
New User
 
VaporTrail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (Quick 200k Mile Motor)

um, i thought the sc61 was a 56 trim...
Old 07-03-2003, 06:30 PM
  #23  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Quick 200k Mile Motor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NW, FL
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover (VaporTrail)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VaporTrail &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">um, i thought the sc61 was a 56 trim...</TD></TR></TABLE>
i knoe, i was just comparing housings .70a/r vs .60a/r (.72 vs .58)
i remember seeing in a thread the option to go with the lower trim wheel ..maybe?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spoolinvtec54
Forced Induction
3
07-05-2011 05:31 PM
JDogg
Forced Induction
11
03-10-2005 10:59 AM
1.8tgsr
Forced Induction
1
02-11-2005 07:26 AM
turboex
Forced Induction
13
06-15-2004 10:30 PM



Quick Reply: sc61 to4e cover vs to4s cover



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:18 PM.