low torque
Cool Cool Island Breezes. BOY-EE
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 9
From: TRILLINOIS....WAY downtown, jerky.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LAS2K »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not a "power" upgrade, but a quicker acceleration at lower revs can be achieved with final drive gears. 4.44, 4.56/7, 4.77, 4.9, 5.10 </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, but then you gotta deal with high revs on the highway. IMO its not practical for a daily once you get much past the 4.56 mark.
If you want easy low end torque, you're not really looking at the right car. It's not really that bad, though. Go drive one. I mean you can't step out of a camaro from the camaro dealership (where you can trade in all your money for a camaro) and feel right at home...but the stock F20/22 definitely gets the job done.
You can turbo it. With a relatively small turbo, you can get some good low end. But then you gotta deal with a lot of other stuff.
Yeah, but then you gotta deal with high revs on the highway. IMO its not practical for a daily once you get much past the 4.56 mark.
If you want easy low end torque, you're not really looking at the right car. It's not really that bad, though. Go drive one. I mean you can't step out of a camaro from the camaro dealership (where you can trade in all your money for a camaro) and feel right at home...but the stock F20/22 definitely gets the job done.
You can turbo it. With a relatively small turbo, you can get some good low end. But then you gotta deal with a lot of other stuff.
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
From: home of Marciano/Haggler, city of champions, MA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Curiouz_G »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ive never seen a s2000 with over 4.77 gears. i cant imagine how 4.9 or 5.1 gears would be on a boosted s2000
or even a stock one </TD></TR></TABLE>
the j's racing yellow s2000 has 5.1 i believe.
low end torque on the ap1/2 motor is a joke.
go throw in a 14b eclipse turbo but you'll fall flat on your face by 5000 rpm.
maybe a garrett "disco potato" setup would help
or even a stock one </TD></TR></TABLE>the j's racing yellow s2000 has 5.1 i believe.
low end torque on the ap1/2 motor is a joke.
go throw in a 14b eclipse turbo but you'll fall flat on your face by 5000 rpm.
maybe a garrett "disco potato" setup would help
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dark-s2k »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">swap in an ls1 or ls2 or ls6 or ls7 engine.

or you can buy a stroker kit (2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 2.7) and an EMS.</TD></TR></TABLE>
id rather flinstone the car than put a chevy motor in it

or you can buy a stroker kit (2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 2.7) and an EMS.</TD></TR></TABLE>
id rather flinstone the car than put a chevy motor in it
I'm sure Chevy shares the same feelings
Can you point out a more reliable V8? Dont get me wrong, I believe that almost all american cars are junk but the chevy ls line-up is pretty stout and reliable.
Can you point out a more reliable V8? Dont get me wrong, I believe that almost all american cars are junk but the chevy ls line-up is pretty stout and reliable.
Reliable V8s are highly debatable as to which is best . Any American V8 properly built will last 100K plus miles with proper maintenance. Some will argue Toyota as well. It'll be quite expensive to put a small block in an S, Chevy and Ford small blocks will be the least costly. That's 289 to 351 cubic inches to those of you not familiar... Frame and drivetrain mods are obviously necessary. I think I'd just go with the rear end gears and live with it.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
From: Yeah IM from Jersey, big wup, wanna fight about, it, USA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 70hphf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> It'll be quite expensive to put a small block in an S, Chevy and Ford small blocks will be the least costly. That's 289 to 351 cubic inches to those of you not familiar... Frame and drivetrain mods are obviously necessary. I think I'd just go with the rear end gears and live with it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dark-s2k »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">swap in an ls1 or ls2 or ls6 or ls7 engine.
</TD></TR></TABLE>\
Sarcasm FTW...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dark-s2k »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">swap in an ls1 or ls2 or ls6 or ls7 engine.
</TD></TR></TABLE>\Sarcasm FTW...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 70hphf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Reliable V8s are highly debatable as to which is best . Any American V8 properly built will last 100K plus miles with proper maintenance. Some will argue Toyota as well. It'll be quite expensive to put a small block in an S, Chevy and Ford small blocks will be the least costly. That's 289 to 351 cubic inches to those of you not familiar... Frame and drivetrain mods are obviously necessary. I think I'd just go with the rear end gears and live with it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Something I believe in as well! Proper maintenence on a car that 'isn't so reliable' can go a long wayssss with the proper owner!
Something I believe in as well! Proper maintenence on a car that 'isn't so reliable' can go a long wayssss with the proper owner!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spurge
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
9
Mar 10, 2006 07:25 PM




