My buddy Brandon (carlton585 here on H-T) wanted pics of his ride, so we made somewhat of a night of it. called my buddy Dan (the driver of the VW on blingy 18's) who's a professional photographer, so we did some ****. All shots were taken with Canon 10d 14mm wideangle fisheye or my Canon Digital Rebel with either the 14mm fisheye or 19mm crap lense.

 

Professional?

Nice cars btw.

 

he does photography mainly for Thrasher magazine, and we were rushed with these. They came out quite well for how unprepared (didn't bring some lenses, lense cover or proper tripod) and in a hurry we took them.

Plus the lightly was crappy for 90% of them. Yellow poo

 

nice cars... the blk coupe would looks sick on those gt3s if it was slizzammmed

 

what K hids are on the black coupe?

 

yay for my civic coupe!

cant completely slam my coupe (205/50/16) and the kelvin rating on my hids = 8000k.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JforJonathan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what K hids are on the black coupe?</TD></TR></TABLE>

nvm...i found the answer in the other thread

 

Not to be a dick but this is proof that the camera doesn't make the photographer.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by .ken &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Not to be a dick but this is proof that the camera doesn't make the photographer.</TD></TR></TABLE>

whats that supposed to mean?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by carlton585 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

whats that supposed to mean?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Well everyone says that the camera makes the photographer but unless you know how to use it all the technology in the world won't help you out. The pictures look way underexposed, some overexposed, some angles are too sharp and some of the pics the DOF are off, white balances etc etc.

In this case the camera used was either a 10d or a 300d which you can somewhat see the sharpness in the pics but they could have turned out tons better given the right hands.

I am not trying to come off as a dick or someone who is perfect because I am not.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Daishi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">he does photography mainly for Thrasher magazine, and we were rushed with these. They came out quite well for how unprepared (didn't bring some lenses, lense cover or proper tripod) and in a hurry we took them.

Plus the lightly was crappy for 90% of them. Yellow poo </TD></TR></TABLE>

Thats cool that he works for Thrasher magazine, I grew up reading that, but if hes a professional, he shouldnt make excuses

 

He's not, I am. Not be a dick response, but they are personal photos so I don't give to much of a damn if they are amazingly artistic and perfect. Just photos to show people onlin, I took them between 11:30 pm and 12:30 am and edited at like 1 am, so they are just fucked around with in Photoshop so people can view them and enjoy.

 

A lot of 4x4 going in those pix. Anyways the cars are aight..

 

not the 5th gen

IMO the coupe needs lip kit, and that's about it.

Nebraska roads suck *** though. My front lip scrapes everywhere, and its been torn off twice. Oh well, that's the way I want it.

Should have seen the Golf before we fit the 18's on it, it was ******* LOW, as in the entire chassis, exhaust, body panels were &lt; 1 inch from the ground.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by .ken &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
some overexposed, some angles are too sharp and some of the pics the DOF are off, white balances etc etc.</TD></TR></TABLE>

ha, I thought he did that on purpose

 

nice cars...black coupe on red

 

nice cars!