FOR SALE:92 HATCH SI FULLYBIULT B20
03-03-2005, 06:14 PM
#39
Re: FOR SALE:92 HATCH SI FULLYBIULT 2.0L (smemts)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by smemts »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nice 
the crvtec looks damn clean. good luck with the sale </TD></TR></TABLE> Thank's
the crvtec looks damn clean. good luck with the sale
</TD></TR></TABLE> Thank's
03-03-2005, 08:31 PM
#41
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: southern california, usa
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: FOR SALE:92 HATCH SI FULLYBIULT 2.0L (b20vtecallmota)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b20vtecallmota »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> thanks but it cost more for allmotor to make more horespower in turbo you can just turn a **** and your boosting like an extra 400 horses plus you get more respect with allmotor than turbomy motor alone cost $10,200 plus mine is clean. </TD></TR></TABLE>
heh. bump for you. clearly a very very fast car, and nicely done at that.
But your statement is pretty incorrect and biased. You can't just "turn a ****" for more power in a turbo car. There are other things to take into consideration. The bottom end, the a/f ratio, timing, the turbo and intercooler's efficiency range, dispacement, compression, tuning, etc, etc.
And it's not like there's any secret to a naturally aspirated car. High compression, good cams, tough valvetrain, ideal rod/stroke ratio, displacement, gearing, and a good tuner. And all of which must be taken into consideration when building a turbo car.
Horsepower is horsepower. And bragging about spending more money to get less horsepower just seems silly to me. I'd rather have a 10 second car than a 12 second car any day of the week.
But that's just me. I'm not trying to start an N/A vs Turbo thing here, and again, Very nice car.
heh. bump for you. clearly a very very fast car, and nicely done at that.
But your statement is pretty incorrect and biased. You can't just "turn a ****" for more power in a turbo car. There are other things to take into consideration. The bottom end, the a/f ratio, timing, the turbo and intercooler's efficiency range, dispacement, compression, tuning, etc, etc.
And it's not like there's any secret to a naturally aspirated car. High compression, good cams, tough valvetrain, ideal rod/stroke ratio, displacement, gearing, and a good tuner. And all of which must be taken into consideration when building a turbo car.
Horsepower is horsepower. And bragging about spending more money to get less horsepower just seems silly to me. I'd rather have a 10 second car than a 12 second car any day of the week.
But that's just me. I'm not trying to start an N/A vs Turbo thing here, and again, Very nice car.
03-04-2005, 01:52 PM
#45
Re: FOR SALE:92 HATCH SI FULLYBIULT 2.0L (b20vtecallmota)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tofurky »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">heh. bump for you. clearly a very very fast car, and nicely done at that.
But your statement is pretty incorrect and biased. You can't just "turn a ****" for more power in a turbo car. There are other things to take into consideration. The bottom end, the a/f ratio, timing, the turbo and intercooler's efficiency range, dispacement, compression, tuning, etc, etc.
And it's not like there's any secret to a naturally aspirated car. High compression, good cams, tough valvetrain, ideal rod/stroke ratio, displacement, gearing, and a good tuner. And all of which must be taken into consideration when building a turbo car.
Horsepower is horsepower. And bragging about spending more money to get less horsepower just seems silly to me. I'd rather have a 10 second car than a 12 second car any day of the week. But that's just me. I'm not trying to start an N/A vs Turbo thing here, and again, Very nice car. </TD></TR></TABLE>
But your statement is pretty incorrect and biased. You can't just "turn a ****" for more power in a turbo car. There are other things to take into consideration. The bottom end, the a/f ratio, timing, the turbo and intercooler's efficiency range, dispacement, compression, tuning, etc, etc.
And it's not like there's any secret to a naturally aspirated car. High compression, good cams, tough valvetrain, ideal rod/stroke ratio, displacement, gearing, and a good tuner. And all of which must be taken into consideration when building a turbo car.
Horsepower is horsepower. And bragging about spending more money to get less horsepower just seems silly to me. I'd rather have a 10 second car than a 12 second car any day of the week. But that's just me. I'm not trying to start an N/A vs Turbo thing here, and again, Very nice car. </TD></TR></TABLE>