Tech / Misc Tech topics that don't seem to go elsewhere.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

HP vs Torque?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 08:38 AM
  #1  
handa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 0
From: Solo
Default HP vs Torque?

Horsepower or torque...which would you prefer more?
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 08:43 AM
  #2  
Archidictus's Avatar
Unceasing Measure
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 6
From: Columbus Ohio
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (handa)

Since horsepower is nothing more than a function of torque over time, I'd gladly take more torque, especially in a Honda. By the way, this shouldn't be asked in this forum.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 08:51 AM
  #3  
BauleyCivic's Avatar
Risky Business
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,227
Likes: 47
From: Trackside with the smoking bee
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (Archidictus)



torque
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 08:54 AM
  #4  
AtomicEG's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Scarborough, Ont, Canada
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (BauleyCivic)

Very Funny........But I have to argee
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 08:56 AM
  #5  
moondoggy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,662
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (AtomicEG)

it would be better if you ask "torque vs rpm"
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 08:57 AM
  #6  
handa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 0
From: Solo
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (BauleyCivic)

LOL that's funny!! All show but no go! and vice.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 09:00 AM
  #7  
Marauder's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,187
Likes: 2
From: SoCal, CA, USA
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (handa)

Horsepower = Torque x RPM / 5252

The more area under the torque curve, the faster your car is.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 09:06 AM
  #8  
KRiS1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (handa)

Torque

My vr6 jetta "feels" faster around town than my B18C5 hatch.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 10:10 AM
  #9  
99EKhatch's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: svw, ny, us
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (POS Hatchback)

b20....tourqe and hp
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 10:20 AM
  #10  
mantic6t9's Avatar
Trial User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,630
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (handa)

After owning my si hatch for 3 years and going to the m3 i just bought i have to say TORQUE!!! After all it's torque that gets you off the line, it's hard to manage alot of torque on a front wheel drive car though. I think torque makes a car more fun to drive that's just my opinion.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 12:37 PM
  #11  
UNDER PRESSURE's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ., USA
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (mantic6t9)

I remember my boss sending me that awhile back. That day I got tired of all his bickering and called him out. Outcome: he lost twice. If you call BS talk to tonyxcom he helped me out in the camero forum. Here's a link to the thread: https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=316605 oh and in regards to the thread people buy horsepower but they drive torque. One thing I forgot to add now he say's that he wants to run my B16 turbo powered rex.


Modified by UNDER PRESSURE at 10:44 PM 8/1/2003
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 12:53 PM
  #12  
Al Bundy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Surf City, CA, USA
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (handa)

TORQUE. I'm sick and tired of downshifting to pass caravans.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 02:09 PM
  #13  
ol_scool's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Enterprise, al, USA
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (handa)

after driving a 2000 si and then a 2002 si both have the same hp and different troque, i am going to say torque
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 02:10 PM
  #14  
Greyout's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Austin, Tx, USA
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (Al Bundy)

wtf? Why don't one of you physics gurus explain the difference between a type R and a GS-R? I guess that 1 ft/lb advantage the Type R has is responsible for the 7 car length advantage in the 1/4 mile, eh?



never seen so many idiots come together at once.

tell me this:
car #1 has a peak XXX hp and 400 ft-lbs of torque
car #2 has a peak 300 hp and 200 ft-lbs of torque

Which one do you feel like you would be able to judge how fast it is in the 1/4 mile


TORQUE is a measurement of FORCE. HORSEPOWER is a measurement of WORK PERFORMED. Moving a car a given distance from a standstill is WORK PERFORMED. The equations that provide you with an estimated time for moving an object from point A to point B all ask for horsepower.

If you want to cry about 'low end' vs. 'high end' power, then debate that. But gaining 10 ft/lbs more torque at 7,000 RPM is a LOT more benificial then gaining 30 ft/lbs of torque at 2,000 RPM.... its not a coincidence that a torque gain gives a higher HP figure at higher RPM then at lower RPM.

I would GLADLY take a 15 ft-lb of torque disadvantage for a 6 or 7 hp advantage.


Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 02:18 PM
  #15  
fivespeedintegra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
From: in the S2000!
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (Al Bundy)

excellent article.....no cliff-notes.....just read and learn.


The topics of horsepower and torque can be confusing. We use these yardsticks to compare engines but what do they really mean, how are they related and which one is more important? An old saying is "torque wins races, horsepower sells cars". It implies the uninformed public is incorrectly focused on horsepower. Is that so?

In fact horsepower and torque are entirely different things and are measured using different units.

Torque - Torque is a measure of twisting force, pure and simple. Torque includes no concept of motion or time. This is easily understood by anyone who has used a torque wrench. A torque wrench can measure twisting force on a bolt that is stationary or turning. In the US torque is normally expressed in foot pounds.

Torque is created any time opposing forces are applied at different points along a lever arm. Imagine a weightless one foot long lever arm connected at one end to a stationary pivot point. If we apply a one pound force at the other end of that lever arm a one foot pound twisting force will be exerted (one foot pound of torque). If we apply a two pound force then a two foot pound twisting force will be exerted.

Engines exert torque at the crankshaft. That torque is coupled through the transmission, driveline and ultimately to the drive axle. The twisting force at the drive axle is converted to a linear force where the tire tread meets the road surface. The linear force is measured in pounds and pushes the car forward.

We can easily calculate the linear force that accelerates the car knowing only the torque at the drive axle and the diameter of the tires.

Linear force = Axle Torque / Tire Diameter / 2

The torque exerted by the engine varies with rpm and is typically expressed as a curve. The curve is the collection of instantaneous torque measurements at each rpm point.

Neglecting driveline losses, the axle torque and linear force that pushes the car are directly proportional to the crankshaft torque for a given gear. That means that, for a given gear and neglecting air resistance, the car will always accelerate at the same rate whenever the engine is producing a given torque. It doesn't matter what RPM the engine is turning or the speed of the vehicle. A perfectly flat torque curve would allow the car to accelerate the same at any RPM.

In the real world torque curves are not flat, they build to peak and then taper off at high RPM. A car will accelerate hardest in a given gear when the engine is operating at its torque peak.

Notice that we can figure out how hard the car is accelerating and horsepower doesn't even enter into the discussion.

Horsepower
- Horsepower is a measure of the rate at which work can be performed. Motion and time are integral to horsepower which is typically expressed as foot pounds per minute in the US.

In this case work has nothing to do with your boss. Work means moving an object in opposition to a force (that may remind some of their boss). Raising one pound a distance of one foot is one foot pound of work. Raising one pound a distance of two feet is two foot pounds of work.

Horsepower combines the concept of work with time. In the 1700s James Watt of steam engine fame took some measurements and concluded that an average horse could lift a 550 pound weight one foot in one second. Watt defined one horsepower as 550 foot pounds per second or 33,000 foot pounds per minute.

We can show a direct relationship between torque and horsepower. Remember our one foot lever arm with the pivot at one end and one pound force at the other? If it rotates about the pivot one full revolution in one minute it will move that one pound 2*pi*r or 6.28 feet per minute (think about a point on a tire tread rotating about its axle). If it rotates at 5252 RPM it will move that one pound 6.28 * 5252 or 33,000 feet per minute, exactly one horsepower. Hence the relationship between horsepower and torque is defined as follows:

Horsepower = torque * RPM / 5252

This is a linear relationship and says that horsepower will rise in lockstep with RPM and torque. The horsepower produced by an engine varies with rpm and is typically expressed as a curve. The curve is simply the collection of instantaneous horsepower calculations at each rpm point.

To review we know that a) axle torque converted to linear force accelerates the car b) for a given gear the acceleration will be greatest at the engine torque peak and has nothing to do with RPM or speed c) horsepower is a calculated function of torque and RPM.

So horsepower doesn't matter, right? Wrong! Read on.

Torque multiplication
- The transmission is a torque multiplier. Reduction gears are employed to make the drive shaft rotate at a slower RPM than the crank shaft (ignoring overdrive). These reduction gears cause a similar increase in the drive shaft torque.

As an example a hypothetical two-speed transmission might have a first gear with a 2:1 reduction gears and a second gear with 1:1 gears. Let's connect that transmission to a an engine that can produce 100 foot pounds of torque at the crank shaft throughout the RPM range.

The 1:1 second gear rotates the drive shaft at the same speed as the crankshaft and it will exert exactly the same 100 foot pounds of torque (neglecting frictional losses). However the 2:1 first gear rotates the drive shaft at half the speed of the crankshaft but it will exert 200 foot lbs of torque, twice the torque of the crank shaft! That means first gear will accelerate the car twice as hard as second gear.

Therein lies the key to why we care about horsepower. Through reduction gears maximum drive axle torque for a given vehicle speed is generated when the engine is operating at its horsepower peak and not its torque peak (they are rarely the same).

As an example recall our car with two speeds, flat torque curve, 100 foot pound engine. Imagine it has a 1:1 final drive ratio that propels the car at 107 mph (makes the math simple) at 1500 RPM in second gear using 24 inch diameter tires. We can also drive the car 107 mph at 3000 RPM in first gear. The engine is producing 100 foot pounds of torque in both cases. Which one accelerates the car faster?

The answer of course is first gear.

As a result of torque multiplication a car will accelerate fastest at any given MPH when a gear is selected that puts the engine at its horsepower peak and not its torque peak. This is one reason why small high-revving engines can often beat large low-revving engines. Despite a lower crankshaft torque, the high-revving engine can deliver greater drive axle torque through torque multiplication.

So there it is, torque and horsepower. It seems that horsepower is good for selling cars AND winning races.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 07:42 PM
  #16  
NA_crix's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA, USA
Default

nice article!
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 07:59 PM
  #17  
MightyMouseTech's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
Default Re: (NA_crix)

Just remeber, an F1 car only produces about 200 lb.ft. All that acceleration comes from 200 lb.ft at 18,000 RPM.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2003 | 11:44 PM
  #18  
Mentat Ghola's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
From: Odessa, Mama
Default Re: (MightyMouseTech)

Presicely, hardcore race engines are built for top end.. LOTS OF IT!!! Like formula 1 cars. For daily driving tourque is fun, instant force at any RPM. But racers build for top end.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 01:05 AM
  #19  
xteg95's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,691
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (Al Bundy)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Al Bundy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">TORQUE. I'm sick and tired of downshifting to pass caravans. </TD></TR></TABLE>

lol...thats to true
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 01:39 AM
  #20  
handa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 0
From: Solo
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (xteg01)

Looks like I can use some B18B w/ LS VTEC over B16As since B18B has more torque.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 02:43 AM
  #21  
hybridEj6's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
From: Two blocks from the beach, CA, United States
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (handa)

low end Torque = good daily driving
Top end power = better times

why is it that all really fast cars rev high even V8s?

havent you seen big blocks reving to 8k? Of course on a 4 banger that 8k on the big block is equivelent to 11 or more on a four banger? Whats Aquilars redline by the way? 9.99 baby!!!! all motor no torque hahahahahahahaha
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2003 | 08:58 AM
  #22  
Lsos's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
From: Eindhoven, Netherlands
Default Re: HP vs Torque? (Archidictus)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Archidictus &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Since horsepower is nothing more than a function of torque over time....</TD></TR></TABLE>

For that same reason, I would take horsepower. You and I can both generate more torque than a Honda, given a good transmission. You can generate more torque than 10 Hondas...but you're still not going to be able to push one fast.

And the statement about driving torque...depends who you ask. Since I ALWAYS shift around 8000rpm, you can't tell me that I bought horsepower and drive torque.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BIG T
Transmission & Drivetrain
0
Jul 3, 2015 10:28 AM
pbink
Tech / Misc
4
Sep 22, 2005 12:05 PM
Superhatch
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
9
Jul 10, 2002 04:29 AM
E. Honda
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
13
May 9, 2002 11:59 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:02 AM.