Notices
Tech / Misc Tech topics that don't seem to go elsewhere.

B16 head vs ITR head

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2001, 12:16 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
BoostinDC2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Orange County, CA, USA
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default B16 head vs ITR head

is there a difference besides the bigger ports. i hear the lost motion assembly is alot better but can anyone verify that?
Old 09-18-2001, 12:33 PM
  #2  
New User
 
3rdShift.org's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Tampa, FL, 33616
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: B16 head vs ITR head (BoostinDC2)

I am under the impression that the heads are very structurally and geometrically similar. The stock valvetrain of the typeR head is obviously stiffer and ready to handle more revs... but valvetrain does not *make* power, so in theory each head ported similarly w/ the same cams & revving to the limit of the latter should make similar power.
Old 09-18-2001, 02:01 PM
  #3  
Member
 
Looose_R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: not, tiiight
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: B16 head vs ITR head (BoostinDC2)

both are p30 cast heads, itr's however reciever mild pocket ports.
Old 09-18-2001, 02:41 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Jared's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tallahassee, FL, US
Posts: 7,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: B16 head vs ITR head (b20bastard)

Actually, both are the PR3 casting. ITR is ported to smooth flow in higher RPMs and better flow down low. ITR uses different cams, valve springs, retainers, and LMAs.
Old 09-18-2001, 02:43 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
BoostinDC2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Orange County, CA, USA
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: B16 head vs ITR head (Jared)

so the LMA's are different. whts the difference in the LMA's?
Old 09-18-2001, 06:00 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
bb6h22a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: CA, U.S.A
Posts: 2,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default The LMA's...

..are shorter in the Type R head than in the regular b16 head. But, I have read of people using itr/ctr cams in b16 head w/b16/gsr LMA's w/out incident.
But, if your doing anyway, why not do it all.
Also, the head is different than the b16 in the following ways:
Port and polish job on the head valve seat angle is 45 degress vs. 60, different valves smaller stem radius w/ larger cone also 12% lighter, intake manifold, valve springs, LMA's, cams, all in all the mass of the valvetrain has been redueced dramatically as well as the inertia of the valvetrain, not as much as roller rockers would, but better than tapets..
If you want to read more about the changes made to the R motor as a whole here is a fairly comprhensive article:
http://integra.vtec.net/carboy.html
Hope that helps........


[Modified by bb6h22a, 7:02 PM 9/18/2001]
Old 09-18-2001, 06:39 PM
  #7  
Member
 
rainforest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: clearwater, florida, united states
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: The LMA's... (bb6h22a)

lma lost motion assemblly.
lighter valve train = free horsepower so it does do a little. every thing counts.
Old 09-18-2001, 06:47 PM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
BoostinDC2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Orange County, CA, USA
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: The LMA's... (rainforest)

is there a difference in the weight of the rocker assembly
Old 09-18-2001, 06:52 PM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
BoostinDC2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Orange County, CA, USA
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: The LMA's... (BoostinDC2)

think its worth changing most of the parts to ITR? im just trying to build a turbo head and will rev out to 9-9500.
Old 09-18-2001, 07:03 PM
  #10  
Honda-Tech Member
 
bb6h22a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: CA, U.S.A
Posts: 2,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Well.......

...as far as the 9-9.5K why? Is this a street or race car? Also, beating the **** out of your car like that consistently will quickly erode reliability. However, when I talked to the mechanics for the Realtime ITR's they swore that they revved the cars to 9k all day long on oem itr valvetrain, so you may be ok w/ it? Who knows..
But, you might want to look into Ti retainers and even stiffer valvesprings, something along the lines of Portflow, Toda, Mugen, etc.
If your trying to get the head to flow better, changing the valvetrain, etc, isnt going to make it flow any better at all. The only thing that will change flow and the efficency of the head are the cams, valves, and the geometry of the head.
If you already have the b16 head, just contact either Portflow or AEBS and talk to them about what you want to accomplish, other things you should consider are thermal coating of the combustion chambers, as heat is the # 1 killer of turbo engines.
Honestly, if you get the right sized turbo, you wont need to spin your motor to 9k to make power, much the opposite, you want to be at full boost and the majority of your power after say 3k rpm..
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
umair
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
5
02-23-2009 07:09 PM
RSant
Tech / Misc
7
04-17-2007 05:43 PM
hondaapi
Forced Induction
8
09-28-2005 07:40 AM
JDMlyfestyle
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
4
01-14-2004 03:59 PM



Quick Reply: B16 head vs ITR head



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:17 PM.