I started with 171whp base power and tuned it to get out 193whp and 135lb-ft. I was on a Mustang Dyno not a dynojet, does any one know if these dynos are not accurate? http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...0/fc7e3895.jpg




[Modified by SpoonfedDC2, 5:43 AM 3/17/2003]

 

bump

 

What mods? very nice numbers...

 

all my mods are on the dyno sheet

 

that seems way high for itr cams and bolt ons

 

what should a 193whp, 2600lb car run in the 1/4 mile?

 

something is weird there, you shouldnt be making anywhere that much power

 

generally speaking, mustang dynos will show less HP & TQ than a dynojet... thats the general rule of thumb at least...


[Modified by trboCIVIC&WRX, 1:36 PM 3/19/2003]

 

the kind u get when u go to the track. alot of it depends on how u drive among a bunch of other things.

 

Not possible with just those bolt on.
GSR with jun3
h-i-e
afc tuning only reach about 183!
somthings not right

 

Well i ran a 14.2 with my car untuned. I am trying to get on a dynojet soon. Anyone know where onw would be near Valdosta, Ga.

 

Mid 13's around 100mph

 

well its possible to get around those #s with high compression... what was ur compression? if ur on a stock bottom end.. then the only way to hit those #s is prolly a factory freak motor..

 

i talked to a guy from team toilet or whatever and he uses a mustang dyno and i believe he told me they readout high, but from other people they say low

 

 

What other mods have you done? I'd like to see the complete setup. Because if you're hitting 193 with just i/h/e, itr cams, skunk2 intake manifold, and clutch/flywheel setup, I MUST be doing something terribly wrong.


[Modified by obd2gsr, 11:19 PM 3/19/2003]

 

THat is all I have...my car also has 130,000 miles on it.

 

BS alarm

 

I dunno man. sounds kind of odd and nobody in here can imitate your numbers with a simliar setup. so you're saying that itr cams/skunk2 intake manifold, i/h/e, clutch/flywheel combo is able to lay out over 43 hp than stock? and that's being nice and saying your baselining @ 150, which is unusual, but not unheard of...

man, with 130K miles, maybe you've got so much crud on your pistons, it's bumping up compression to 12:1 ... but I highly doubt that.


[Modified by obd2gsr, 11:36 PM 3/19/2003]

 

Im not the one Bull shitting. I have been studing dyno charts for a long time and I hoped on the dyno thinking I was going to bust out 165whp and be happy with that. When I started with 171whp I was like cool. When we tuned it and pulled 22whp out I was like...holy ****! The shop that I went to is very reputable. Shawn, the ownwer, knows what he is doing. Maybe for some reason the dyno was off, thats why im trying to find a dynojet.

 

what is there to tune? you don't even have cam gears or vafc or hondata or an ecu.

so all the tuning is advancement of the timing?

 

Sorry, I do have a vafc.

 

what did you tune? and what did you use to do it? Just cam gears? fuel? ignition? congratulations on the numbers, especially on a mustang dyno, must be a freak motor.

also, according to your graph, your power didnt look like it was falling of, what valvetrain are you using? you wouldve made another 10hp by reving it a bit pass 8000.

 

here you go...

 

The dyno was 400rpm off and when my power falls is when rev limit hit