4-2-1 vs. 4-1
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hatched92 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i have a c1 and i have a 4-2-1 header on it now but the 4-1 is better for high rpm gains over the 4-2-1 right? should i get it? i have a skunk2 intake mani as well.
thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>
With that mani you'll be making nice power with a 4-1.. 4-1 is for higher RPMS - DC 4-1
thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>
With that mani you'll be making nice power with a 4-1.. 4-1 is for higher RPMS - DC 4-1
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,351
Likes: 0
From: kyoto sangyo daigaku, kyoto, japan, sometimes bay area CA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hatched92 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">eh that would be true if your auto cross but i'm a drag so i want the higher rpm power band, same for the cams.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i'd rather have midrange still..
i'd rather have midrange still..
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dLo GSR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i'd rather have midrange still..</TD></TR></TABLE>
i'd rather have midrange still..</TD></TR></TABLE>
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,351
Likes: 0
From: kyoto sangyo daigaku, kyoto, japan, sometimes bay area CA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2point2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
</TD></TR></TABLE>
well considering that our cars are MADE to make more power at higher revs, i'd rather make up for the loss it creates in the low-mid ranges.
</TD></TR></TABLE>well considering that our cars are MADE to make more power at higher revs, i'd rather make up for the loss it creates in the low-mid ranges.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dLo GSR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
well considering that our cars are MADE to make more power at higher revs, i'd rather make up for the loss it creates in the low-mid ranges.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Um.... You can't really feel your car losing power low end, thats all bullshit. 4-1 is the way to go.
well considering that our cars are MADE to make more power at higher revs, i'd rather make up for the loss it creates in the low-mid ranges.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Um.... You can't really feel your car losing power low end, thats all bullshit. 4-1 is the way to go.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99SiRacer »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Um.... You can't really feel your car losing power low end, thats all bullshit. 4-1 is the way to go.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i can't beleive that we're even discussing this..
4-1 = more gains in acceleration P E R I O D!
Um.... You can't really feel your car losing power low end, thats all bullshit. 4-1 is the way to go.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i can't beleive that we're even discussing this..
4-1 = more gains in acceleration P E R I O D!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by regime »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">does neone have a torque and power chart for a 421 or a 41... if ya do post it up. thats teh true test.</TD></TR></TABLE>
4-1 will make more top end. it's the way it is.. there is very specific reasons for it as well but i don't feel like getting technical.
there is no reason to dig up dynos because this is not new information. damn. this is honda-tech.. not club si.
4-1 will make more top end. it's the way it is.. there is very specific reasons for it as well but i don't feel like getting technical.
there is no reason to dig up dynos because this is not new information. damn. this is honda-tech.. not club si.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
93hondaprelude
Honda Prelude
19
Apr 27, 2006 11:38 AM




