or



as u see on the second one it hits the manifold a bit
would i be ok like that? or just put it like on the first pic?

 

My guess would be like the first pic, but make the line a bit shorter so it fits better.

 

bump anymore comments?

 

100% go with the first one, but shorten the line by about a foot

 

of the 2 i'd go w/ the first...but i think it would be better if you ran a 90 deg fitting from flamenco-t so it's not touching you manifold

 

def. the first. But yeah like stated before shorten the line.

 

To me, the second pic is a better way to route the oil feed.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18Flip &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">of the 2 i'd go w/ the first...but i think it would be better if you ran a 90 deg fitting from flamenco-t so it's not touching you manifold</TD></TR></TABLE>

That's probably the best way and cheap too.

 

neither

get a 45 degree AN adapter, turn it to the side facing dizzy and run it like pic 2

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Turbo Chris &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">neither

get a 45 degree AN adapter, turn it to the side facing dizzy and run it like pic 2</TD></TR></TABLE>

that or a 90 to the front

 

neither are acceptable. way too close to the manifold. A 90* facing foreward as far to the passenger side as possible, without the line touching the comp cover, is the only way short of running hardline down the back of the center section.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bailhatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">neither are acceptable. way too close to the manifold. A 90* facing foreward as far to the passenger side as possible, without the line touching the comp cover, is the only way short of running hardline down the back of the center section.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Agreed. Both methods leave it way too close to the manifold, with one even touching it. That would cook the oil feed to the turbo, especially with the elevated EGTs during boost. I recommend a 90 degree fitting and running the line out from underneath the manifold.

 

problem is that i cant get a 90degree bend in there cuz the turbo piece wont move at all so i cant screw it on

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GReddy SI &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">problem is that i cant get a 90degree bend in there cuz the turbo piece wont move at all so i cant screw it on </TD></TR></TABLE>
Seperate the CHRA(center housing rotating assembly) from the turbine housing (6 13mm bolts) and then put in the 90deg. fitting in there.

 

Either way and you will eventually set the car on fire..

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Boostage &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Either way and you will eventually set the car on fire.. </TD></TR></TABLE>

 

i did that and that middle piece wont move at all
how can i get it to move?

 

If you took the bolts out of the turbine housing it will come right out.

 

i used a 45 degree fitting and didnt have to move anything. just shaped up 2 corners on the fitting and it cleared fine... good luck finding a 45degree #3jic fitting!!!!

 

i had the same problem with my HKS manifold and Garret T-25 turbo.

i traded stan a strait oil line for a 90 degree and it solved the problem.

i then bought some shielding from summit racing and coverd the feed line for added protection.

check my sig for updated pictures.