Are these specs correct ????????????

Taken from TotalJDM.com

Link:

http://www.totaljdm.com/index....m.htm


Cars: JDM 96-97 Integra Type-R
1797cc (DOHC VTEC)
Horsepower: 210hp@8100rpm
Torque: 134lbs-ft@7500rpm
Compression: 11.0:1
Bore: 81mm
Stroke: 87.2mm
OBD: 2
Redline: 8900rpm

 

HP and TQ look a little high to me.

 

What about the OBD2?! The EUDM ITRs are OBD1...

 

That is what I thought exactly.

Also I thought the compression ratio is 11.1 not 11.0???????

Anyone else?????????

 

Yes 11.1:1

 

96 spec motor is basically the same as ours except they have the higher compression (11.1:1), and its 200ps @ 8000 rpm, with 8400rpm redline.

 

My 96 JDM ITR is OBD2 plug layout but the programming is OBD1. Euro ITRs are OBD2 plug layout also but i'm not sure which programming they use.....

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mugenracer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">My 96 JDM ITR is OBD2 plug layout but the programming is OBD1. Euro ITRs are OBD2 plug layout also but i'm not sure which programming they use.....</TD></TR></TABLE>

I think the Euro ITR is just like the JDM, with an OBD1 P72 ECU and OBD2 plug layout.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jmk2888 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That is what I thought exactly.

Also I thought the compression ratio is 11.1 not 11.0???????

Anyone else?????????</TD></TR></TABLE>

I have a 97........thats correct!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NSX Bob &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">HP and TQ look a little high to me.</TD></TR></TABLE>

The JDm b18C-R motors do net more whp and tq on the dyno than the USDM motors. My 97 JDM ITR dynoed stock with just a dc jdm 4-1 header at 175/125

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jelly Bean &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

The JDm b18C-R motors do net more whp and tq on the dyno than the USDM motors. My 97 JDM ITR dynoed stock with just a dc jdm 4-1 header at 175/125</TD></TR></TABLE>

I got 174whp and 123wtq with 16" k1's, dc jdm 4-1 and comptech exhaust.

 

So are the specs on the website BS????

 

The site's numbers are slightly incorrect.

 

210 sounds about right for a 98 spec not to sure about the 96 spec because of the header.

 

Well they were 200ps at 8000 which is equivalent to like 196-197hp. Torque was 18.5kg-m at 7500 which is like 133.2 lb-ft. The 98 Spec was the same ps numbers, but torque was 19.0 (136.8) made at 6200 rpms. Mostly due to the 4-1 header and the CTR exhaust cam from what I remember.

 

I put down 176whp, 126wtrq. w/ my 96 ITR swap+bolt ons.
Given a 15% drivetrain loss, that equals out to 202.4 flywheelHP and 144.9 flywheel trq.....the HP seems correct but the trq. seems high.
Therefore 200hp would be correct for a 96spec JDM ITR.

 

Bump:

Anyone else???

 

PS and BHP are not the same. Everyone thinks JDM is better, and for what a mugen headgasket is worth, the compression is slightly better but lets put it like this. 200PS equals approx. 197bhp.
Bottom line.

Compression : JDM 11.1 USDM 10.6
Japanese High grade gas - 98 octane
United States High Grade gas - 93 Octane (depending on location)
Difference in actual HP?? 2hp with .4 Higher compression and 5 octane points higher octane gas. Is it worth the difference? I say NO. Yeah, higher compression is good but if you really wanted power, i'd think most ppl would build the internals up and yes, the bottom end is a bitch, its worth doing if 2 HP is really that important.
Thats just my .02 cents

 

Could you explain how the SAE HP are calculated ?

I 'm pretty sure it's without all accessories like alternator, power steering, air con compressor.....

The JDM and ISO DIN European HP are calculated with ALL Accessories.

1 HP = 1.0139cv DIN after, you have to apply the SAE or ISO corrected.


Modified by sylvain at 2:29 PM 6/23/2004