anyone dealing with these 2 springs?

which would give a better drop and preformance? my frined has the sportline on his si and its awsome no gap at all i want springs that will lower a stock integra with no gap between the wheel and fender but the fender not overlaping the wheel.

which would you go with?

 

tein

 

are u saying that because its better or because its the hype on here?

will the tien give a drop so that their is no gap between wheel and fender? amd a smooth ride?

 

Go with the Sportline, there was a few threads talking about Tein's low end suspension and how it's mostly hype. I know quite a few people pissed off with S-TECHs. Tein makes good suspension kits if you are gonna buy RAs or REs, but those are like 1600 suspensions.

 

I agree Tein is really over rated and overpriced just for their entry level products which are good but not worth the cash the upper level stuff is superb but really will do no good unless u are really hardcore Auto Xer and need a hardcore suspension

 

S-Techs suck IMO. will they be used with stock shocks?

 

I hate my Tein springs!!! They totally dumped the front end of the car. My front tires are a good inch into the fender well and the rear fender line is above the tires.

My next move is going to be some GC's with specific spring rates, then I can use any shocks I want.

 

for a little bit they will be used with stock shocks till i could get some money to get some

 

Lowered on sportlines with stock rims.

 

is ur front fender overlaping ur tire a little or is it because of the lighting of the picture

 

Must be lighting ...

 

You may want to consider

Tein High Tech springs:
Rate: Front- 296 Rear- 257
Drop: Front- 1.7" Rear- .9"
Progressive

Compared to

Tein S-Tech springs:
Rate: Front-335 Rear-274
Drop: Front- 2.5" Rear- 1.7"
Progressive

and

Eibach Sport Line:
Rate: F&R- Front 231 Rear 143
Drop: F&R- 1.7"
Progressive

http://www.team-integra.net/fo...age=1

 

tein's will slam your car.

 

tein

 

Sportlines =

They make the rear of the car lower than the front.

 

yup i agree with him. when i had my sportlines the front look higher than the back. it was a fudged up drop. or maybe the shop here in this ghetto *** city in texas fudged it up. i dont kno..

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ebelp &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Sportlines =

They make the rear of the car lower than the front. </TD></TR></TABLE>

I had the same problem so i decided to get a full coilover set up.
JIC Magic FLT-A2s

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Sportlines =
They make the rear of the car lower than the front.
</TD></TR></TABLE>


The front looks higher than the rear NOT because the springs are bad but because of the way the fenders on our cars are made to give the
illusion that they are off. (In all honesty, I think Eibach make some of the best springs and compared to other springs... they don't tend to
sag as time passes).

It's a 1.7" drop all around... plain and simple. I'm sure there are many springs out there with a lower front drop to offset the illusion like
H&Rs and Neuspeed. Go ahead and check...

 

I think the "S" in Tein S-tech means "style."

 

By the way... who drives around with a 2.5" front drop with bad camber (negative toe)?

Doh! Nevermind... my friend does. =P Damn H&R racing springs! Really you guys, they're not 2.0" drops.. they're more like 2.5"!

 

sportlines



Its a good drop, a little bit lower in the front than the back to give it that "raked" look. Its good if you dont want too low of a drop
-steve