deleted by 1meanb18c5civic


Modified by 1meanB18c5civic at 10:02 PM 4/16/2004

 

 

i did the same thing .

 

I felt the diff slightly from the stock b16 manifold to the type R.

 

[QUOTE=1meanB18c5civic]
the head REALLY flows now on top end. Midrange is about the same, maybe a little more...I was right abouth that.
[QUOTE]

Those are nice claims, but do you have any data (ie. flow bench results, dyno charts, etc) to back up your claims, or are these claims coming from the useless and decieving all mighty "butt-o-meter"?

 

Those are nice claims, but do you have any data (ie. flow bench results, dyno charts, etc) to back up your claims, or are these claims coming from the useless and decieving all mighty "butt-o-meter"?[/QUOTE]

get real! its all talk. i know why he feels more power, its because he's probably hitting 9000rpm and the b16 manifold can't flow up there, but, i can almost guarantee he did not make any power over the stock im. actually, i'm sure if the b16 manifold was ported it would make more power also. i find this to be an unfair comparison.

 

sorry, i deleted my setup and half my post due to San Antonio being notorious for thieves and stealing hondas.
anyway, i will be getting the car tuned soon. the b16 manifold HAD TO OF BEEN a bottleneck when being used with a portflow head, b18c5 block, Toda B's, JDM 4-1, 2.5" exhaust and around 11.2 CR(of course with all the other goodies, Toda P28, Fields vtec ..etc..etc)
This was not a scientific comparioson just a visual comparison of the two and how the ITR will definetely flow better on a setup like mine plugged up with a small IM like the one I had before.
DO NOT even try and say that the JDM ITR IM wont flow better. I've seen many dyno charts on here of the ITR unit making more power on simple setups like mine than JG and AEBS manifolds.
later.

 

[QUOTE=BryanPendleton][QUOTE=1meanB18c5civic]
the head REALLY flows now on top end. Midrange is about the same, maybe a little more...I was right abouth that.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Those are nice claims, but do you have any data (ie. flow bench results, dyno charts, etc) to back up your claims, or are these claims coming from the useless and decieving all mighty "butt-o-meter"?</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1meanB18c5civic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">DO NOT even try and say that the JDM ITR IM wont flow better.</TD></TR></TABLE>


I never said you were wrong. In fact I agree, as should any auto enthusiast with the slightest knowlege of honda's B-series motors. I am simply disappointed with the utter lack of "meat" to this thread. Your title leads me to believe that you have some actual data to quantify the differences between the two manifolds. But in reality you are simply stating the obvious: That the ITR IM flows more than a B16 IM, and that the topend of the powerband of the ITR IM is higher. That is the obvious and it agrees with basic fluid dynamics of manifold design. Bring some actual data to the table is all I am asking, and never trust your ***. Your body "feels" accelleration, which is directly proportional to torque. So what you feel is changes in the torque curves NOT power. Power is a derivative of time, which you cannot "feel" time.

 

It was just a post. also just a comparison(visually) between the two. pics are always nice.

 

does anybody have better info on this ?

 

BUMP