Edelbrock vs. Rev Hard

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 06:12 PM
  #1  
phreakmang's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Stockton, IL, 61085
Default Edelbrock vs. Rev Hard

Car: 97 civic coupe ex - stock internals d16y8

So for the past month and a half i've been reading up a ton and bugging the **** out of people for information on turbo's. It's came down to a choice between the very nice and complete edelbrock kit, to the (what i see it as) more tunable/more power rev hard kit.

With the Revhard kit I would also add the Edelbrock Intake Manifold and 550 Injectors

For the Edelbrock kit it is complete, no other parts needed at all.

I've already bought a hondata s200b, datalogging, software, procket programmer, and romulator...and picking up a turbo timer, boost controller, and necessary gauges upon purchase of the turbo.

What are my gains from choosing this kit or that? The price in the end really doesn't matter but they are almost identical....I want to order my kit by the end of this month, just want to make sure this is done right the first time.

Peace.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 06:27 PM
  #2  
spoolinlude's Avatar
I live under a rock
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,107
Likes: 0
From: Purple Prelude, DE
Default Re: Edelbrock vs. Rev Hard (phreakmang)

Go with rev-hard

I don't think the edelbrock kit really compares to rev hard, at all. Yeah they offer the intake with it, but the rev hard is just flat out a better kit with better components
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 06:42 PM
  #3  
phreakmang's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Stockton, IL, 61085
Default Re: Edelbrock vs. Rev Hard (spoolinlude)

Thats what i've been thinking, thanks.

Do you think going with the edelbrock performer x intake manifold is a good idea?
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 06:49 PM
  #4  
HXMan's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,698
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Default Re: Edelbrock vs. Rev Hard (phreakmang)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by phreakmang &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thats what i've been thinking, thanks.

Do you think going with the edelbrock performer x intake manifold is a good idea?</TD></TR></TABLE>

I would say put that money toward a set of pistons and rods.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 06:57 PM
  #5  
phreakmang's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Stockton, IL, 61085
Default Re: Edelbrock vs. Rev Hard (HXMan)

I'm not going to be doing any internal work....yet.

Going to save that for later on once I get home, if I ever do it. Have a 97 hatch sitting that is begging for some loving like i've given the coupe. Thing wont see more then 7psi, it's just a hobby car...thought that the intake mani would really finish off the turbo kit nicely though.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TechCMS
Honda S2000
5
Jul 29, 2006 02:32 PM
Boosted_Coupe
Forced Induction
12
Mar 21, 2006 10:33 PM
03 Civic Si
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
1
Jun 27, 2004 09:00 PM
vtekstorm
Forced Induction
2
Jan 18, 2004 12:21 PM
civteg1
Acura Integra
2
Mar 29, 2002 12:22 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:57 AM.