Exhaust help with turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 06:48 AM
  #1  
Cee_mon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 2
Default Exhaust help with turbo?

the car is a 95 si (canada) with a greddy kit with drag intercooler. Boost is set at 5 psi right now but end of august iam going to be running the VAFC hack 8-10 psi. Which exhaust size should i be looking at? Will the Type R muffler be to small? Also what should i do about the cat? Gut it? Get a new one??
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 07:34 AM
  #2  
boostdB16a's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Muskogee, ok, US
Default

leave the cat on it will leave good back-pressure for the turbo....and i am using a Thermal Research and Development Exhuast. i like it anyways!
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 07:40 AM
  #3  
hybridreams's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,720
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default Re: Exhaust help with turbo? (Cee_mon)

Test pipe (not gutted cat) with 2.5 piping should be ok.

If you go with Thermal's turbo exhaust system (3 inch), I'd go with a high flow cat.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 08:08 AM
  #4  
romeo619romeo's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Default Re: Exhaust help with turbo? (hybridreams)

thats something oyu dotn want for turbo " backpressure"
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 08:09 AM
  #5  
Anyotherone's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default Re: (boostdB16a)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boostdB16a &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">leave the cat on it will leave good back-pressure for the turbo</TD></TR></TABLE>

That backpressure myth is BS. For up to 250whp get a 2.5" high-flow cat all the way back. No bottlenecks. For over 250whp get 3" like the thermal. Free flowing exhaust allows the turbo to spool up quicker!

(Within reason, don't go slap a 4" exhaust on a car only making 230whp or something)
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 08:37 AM
  #6  
Neptune's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
From: Verdesboro, NC, USA
Default Re: (C_tech97GSR)

Modified because I cant think with three hours of sleep.


Modified by Neptune at 6:22 PM 7/15/2003
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 10:01 AM
  #7  
2000GSRT's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: NoVA, USA
Default Re: (Neptune)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Neptune &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I would say 3" if you want to up the boost ever get a highflow 3" cat as well. I don't understand the back pressure myth. If the vacum created by the exhuast gases pulse pushes and pulls the next pulse out of the exhaust then to size the exhuast just right would make the exhaust delivery better right? Going to big is bad for the flow right? Isnt that what you just pointed out by telling him to get the 2.5 instead of a 3" for a car with 250 or less HP? What is your logic for the back pressure myth to be false, unless I am not understanding you correctly. </TD></TR></TABLE>
The turbo is going to create a litte backpressure anyway, you don't want any backpressure after the turbo that will affect spool-up and HP.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 10:12 AM
  #8  
boosted92's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 1
Default Re: (boostdB16a)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boostdB16a &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">leave the cat on it will leave good back-pressure for the turbo....and i am using a Thermal Research and Development Exhuast. i like it anyways!</TD></TR></TABLE>

Backpressure on a turbo car is BS. You want the pipe to be as big, straight, and short as possible.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 11:37 AM
  #9  
Cee_mon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 2
Default Re: (boosted92)

ok....great answers guys.....i will be going with 2.5 like I was before...is the type R muffler to resrictive?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 11:40 AM
  #10  
quikB18B's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,018
Likes: 0
From: Dallas Sewers, Usa
Default Re: (Cee_mon)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Cee_mon &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ok....great answers guys.....i will be going with 2.5 like I was before...is the type R muffler to resrictive? </TD></TR></TABLE>

Is that what is currently on the car?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 12:07 PM
  #11  
Anyotherone's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default Re: (quikB18B)

The ITR muffler isn't straight thru, and the ITR catback is 2.25" anyway, so it isn't worth bottlenecking the whole system, IMHO. I'm pretty sure that it pinches it to 2" at the muffler too.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 12:27 PM
  #12  
Cee_mon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 2
Default Re: (quikB18B)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by quikB18B &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Is that what is currently on the car?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Nope ive got axle back Dynomax super turbo muffler.... But it is really resrictive.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mikej94civex
Forced Induction
5
Jan 3, 2010 04:54 PM
igo4bmx
Forced Induction
10
Apr 5, 2005 10:03 AM
Avenged7x
Forced Induction
1
Mar 14, 2005 07:40 PM
overboostedcivic
Forced Induction
1
Jun 16, 2004 11:41 PM
bmm89
Forced Induction
2
Apr 1, 2002 02:56 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:15 PM.