Engine Shock Absorber - DC2
J's Racing Integra Engine Shock Absorber DC2
I was looking at this item because I have noticed that a few people have these. Anyone has more input about them?
http://www.jsracing.co.jp/index2.html
I was looking at this item because I have noticed that a few people have these. Anyone has more input about them?
http://www.jsracing.co.jp/index2.html
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,050
Likes: 59
From: Nowhere and Everywhere
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Padawan »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I believe some modification is necessary when using the damper on LHD Integras.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why is that, there shouldn't be any difference in the places that thing bolts to (engine and shock tower) whether the car is LHD or RHD.
Why is that, there shouldn't be any difference in the places that thing bolts to (engine and shock tower) whether the car is LHD or RHD.
Trending Topics
yeah search for katman's thread on here....he did it in his car some time ago. from there, you should be able to find another thread on why the brcket was modified to make it fit an LHD car. think it was something with the master cylinder or something.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by PatrickGSR94 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why is that, there shouldn't be any difference in the places that thing bolts to (engine and shock tower) whether the car is LHD or RHD.</TD></TR></TABLE>
The picture that was posted is of the Civic version of the damper. On the Integra, you can clearly see that the MC would interfere with the damper on a LHD vehicle.
The picture that was posted is of the Civic version of the damper. On the Integra, you can clearly see that the MC would interfere with the damper on a LHD vehicle.
Someone in the ITR forum cut out a portion of that bracket you see there on the right so it doesn't contact the brake MC. FYI there's no damper available for the passenger side.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ebelp »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I found a pic! Took me forever to find it....this pic was posted by user olskodumie
That thing is sweet looking!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yea, I saw that pic and asked olskodumie, he said his dash shook like hell and he has mass wheel hop. Getting this thing solved it.
Here's the link to jsracing: http://www.jsracing.co.jp/index2.html
That thing is sweet looking!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yea, I saw that pic and asked olskodumie, he said his dash shook like hell and he has mass wheel hop. Getting this thing solved it.
Here's the link to jsracing: http://www.jsracing.co.jp/index2.html
Could you effectively do the same thing by mounting a more traditional shock between the motor and the engine bay? I always wondered if car manufactures ever used this technique, that way you would get a progressive control of engine movement, and you wouldn't have to use overly hard materials like the ES inserts that cause vibrations at all engine loads. Maybe like a shock on both sides of the motor, connected to the firewall or strut tower?
Its hard to tell, but is the J's thing just like an adjustable bolt, or is it an actual shock?
Its hard to tell, but is the J's thing just like an adjustable bolt, or is it an actual shock?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Westrock2000 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Could you effectively do the same thing by mounting a more traditional shock between the motor and the engine bay? I always wondered if car manufactures ever used this technique, that way you would get a progressive control of engine movement, and you wouldn't have to use overly hard materials like the ES inserts that cause vibrations at all engine loads. Maybe like a shock on both sides of the motor, connected to the firewall or strut tower?
Its hard to tell, but is the J's thing just like an adjustable bolt, or is it an actual shock?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The J's unit is an actual damper. Its designed like a shock just doesnt have liquid inside, It uses rubber which compresses and expands to stabalize the two jointed objects.
Its hard to tell, but is the J's thing just like an adjustable bolt, or is it an actual shock?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The J's unit is an actual damper. Its designed like a shock just doesnt have liquid inside, It uses rubber which compresses and expands to stabalize the two jointed objects.
my '89 944 turbo has liquid filled engine mounts that filter out an unbelievable amount of vibration. When they went out, the interior mirror fell off the windshield after only 3 days while I was waiting for the replacements...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by roadrunner »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">my '89 944 turbo has liquid filled engine mounts that filter out an unbelievable amount of vibration. When they went out, the interior mirror fell off the windshield after only 3 days while I was waiting for the replacements...</TD></TR></TABLE>
There is a difference in vibrating because the motor is loose, and from the motor being held in well.
There is a difference in vibrating because the motor is loose, and from the motor being held in well.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Westrock2000 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Could you effectively do the same thing by mounting a more traditional shock between the motor and the engine bay? I always wondered if car manufactures ever used this technique, that way you would get a progressive control of engine movement, and you wouldn't have to use overly hard materials like the ES inserts that cause vibrations at all engine loads. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Lexus does this
Lexus does this
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post









