Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

RevHard vs Fmax

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2002 | 08:21 PM
  #1  
sknot1454's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, wv
Default RevHard vs Fmax

I am deciding on both kits

the rev hard is a little cheaper and dosent come with a t3/t4,

the fmax is more but requires no fabrication and comes with a hybrid

any personal expirences on these

and before you say "drag" I cant afford a gen 4 kit, and the gen 3s have too many problems imo
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2002 | 08:49 PM
  #2  
^R@m!r0_(M)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (sknot1454)

Revhard imo

i have just heard alot better things but thats just me. so theres my opinion
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2002 | 08:51 PM
  #3  
sknot1454's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, wv
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (Sears_Teg)

yea i heard a alot of good stuff

but on the other hand I like how the f-max's goal is to keep realibility with the detonation detector, the low compression head gasket, the new injectors, fuel pump, fmic...

i dunno...******* f/i
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2002 | 09:28 PM
  #4  
Pat's Avatar
Pat
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (sknot1454)

well drag doesn't have a gen 4 for integras right now and the revhard stage 2 kits do come with a t3/t4 hybrid. I myself went with the Max rev kit
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2002 | 12:53 AM
  #5  
SIK IN DA HED's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,415
Likes: 0
From: RAIDER NATION, CA, USA
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (sknot1454)


the gen 3s have too many problems imo
in your opinion? well... lets hear what your opinion is.. and see if you even have an idea why you feel that way.

i chose a DRAG3 over both kits...


[Modified by dlplayboy, 1:53 AM 12/23/2002]
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2002 | 06:17 AM
  #6  
sknot1454's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, wv
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (dlplayboy)

Im sure your aware of the generation 3 manifolds being, well....****

My friends 95 gsr has had his manifold crack twice and he is still running the stock 7 psi, so I havent had a good expirence with drag
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2002 | 07:51 AM
  #7  
SupaTeg's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (sknot1454)

well Fmax is a good turbokit but what you see the most at racetracks are revhard turbokits. If you want reliablility then Fmax but if you want big numbers and plan on going to the track Revhard

P.S revhard stage 2= T3/T40B, stage 2C= T3/T04E


[Modified by SupaTeg, 11:53 AM 12/23/2002]
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2002 | 08:19 AM
  #8  
sknot1454's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, wv
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (SupaTeg)

nah, there isnt a drag track for maybe 200 miles so I dont drag that often. I wont be taking it past 10psi so big hp numbers isnt what Im looking for, but just enough to be decently fast. I got i/h/e, bored tb, and a skunk 2 intake manifold, so its not slow by any means.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2002 | 11:39 AM
  #9  
Danger's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 12,100
Likes: 0
From: Stockton, CA. 209
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (sknot1454)

whats burning in your avatar ?

if your not lookin for massive amounts of HP then go w/ the fmax kit . only thing i dont like about the fmax kits is that you have to remove your front tow-hooks for the piping to fit .

EDIT: i noticed in your sig one of your future upgrades is going to be ctr rods and pistons ? you plan on using those for boost ?


[Modified by jonny5, 8:40 PM 12/24/2002]
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2002 | 02:49 PM
  #10  
Stewie's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
From: Nutley, NJ
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (jonny5)

Doesn't the f-max kit only supply one fuel injector to be put before the TB as a fuel system?
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2002 | 03:12 PM
  #11  
tegasaurus's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ, usa
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (Mac8008)

2 x 440cc secondaries.... under no boost there is no extra fuel being provided.... once 1 psi comes in, those injectors start adding a little bit of fuel. It's designed to keep it at the perfect a/f ratio for 10 psi. If you throw on the head gasket they provide, the nyou cna bump it up to 12 or 13.

good luck.

custom is my route
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2002 | 03:49 PM
  #12  
Mase's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,139
Likes: 0
From: The Swamp, FL
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (dlplayboy)

I hate reading false information, like the drag 3 kit is junk. THe manifolds of the Gen 2 drag kits werent that great, but I had a drag 3 kit for over a year, and had zero problems.

As for the rants and raves on why anyone would classify a kit as being bad for not having a t3/t04e, here is some words of wisdom:

I made 270whp/ 229 ft/lbs on a drag 3 kit w/ a small t04b and hondata w/ rc 500 cc injectors. this was at about 10.5 psi this was on a very small Greddy SP exhaust. If you arent going to build your block, why in the world would you need a bigger compressor for the ls motor which doesnt flow as much as say a gsr motor. Unless you like lag, like to brag, or plan on building the motor, i dont see why you should get such a big turbo.

Next is price, I paid $2600 shipped for my drag 3 kit, it would be extremely hard to find the other kits at this price, you can use the money you saved and spent it on standalone.


That being said, I just got done piecing together a kit of my own. It was actually quite a bit cheaper, and using all the parts i feel that are best quality, I think the best way to go, if you have the time, is to piece together a custom kit.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2002 | 05:18 PM
  #13  
Night_Minx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (sknot1454)

realiability? low boost levels? good value? Maybe niether, but I like Greddy's Kit. very factory esque install.
Otherwise, Revhard or Drag for my fake b18. ive been happy with my greddy SOHC. Also, Maxrev is very good as well. good luck and have fun boosting.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2002 | 08:47 PM
  #14  
SiMugen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Carle Place, NY
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (Night_Minx)

Revhard
The intercooler for the stage 2C is huge .

also, I've noticed a lot of positive reviews about Revhard in the FI forum.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2002 | 04:01 AM
  #15  
SIK IN DA HED's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,415
Likes: 0
From: RAIDER NATION, CA, USA
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (jtrbocrx)

wise F-MAX all out power DRAG, REV HARD good luck
FMAX sucks.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2002 | 12:36 PM
  #16  
wickedxboi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 0
From: tx
Default Re: RevHard vs Fmax (dlplayboy)

rev hard all the way.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rocket256
Forced Induction
16
Aug 25, 2003 07:58 PM
RudeLude
Forced Induction
6
May 21, 2003 07:43 PM
integra-modder
Forced Induction
17
Feb 27, 2003 05:39 PM
reefer_bob
Forced Induction
13
Jan 7, 2002 11:03 PM
Scotty
Forced Induction
18
Jun 17, 2001 05:50 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:42 AM.