Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2019 | 05:36 PM
  #1  
MastaFlyMason's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 221
Likes: 2
Default Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

So I got my car put together and running, and am almost ready to take it to the dyno. Ended up buying a Skunk2 Pro intake manifold, would I benefit from this? Will be running e85, 16psi boost, and revving to 8300RPM

Setup is as follows:

CRX, b16a2, stock head, Eagle H beam rods, JE 8.5:1 pistons, stock intake, stock TB, Turbonetics 5857, 2.5" intercooler piping, 3" open downpipe, 1000cc Precision injectors, Auto Works cast iron manifold with 38mm Tial wastegate.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2019 | 05:53 PM
  #2  
turboLScrx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 592
From: Bowling Green, ky, USA
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

Originally Posted by MastaFlyMason
So I got my car put together and running, and am almost ready to take it to the dyno. Ended up buying a Skunk2 Pro intake manifold, would I benefit from this? Will be running e85, 16psi boost, and revving to 8300RPM

Setup is as follows:

CRX, b16a2, stock head, Eagle H beam rods, JE 8.5:1 pistons, stock intake, stock TB, Turbonetics 5857, 2.5" intercooler piping, 3" open downpipe, 1000cc Precision injectors, Auto Works cast iron manifold with 38mm Tial wastegate.
‘it should flow better than the stock one and from me research it should unlock power at the higher rpms up to a certain power level (guessing 350-450) then the restrictions on air flow become a factor again and the better intake would be needed to free up airflow/power again
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 05:05 AM
  #3  
NewTeacher2017's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

I always had the best luck with the VictorX mani, but that was a while ago, not sure if quality has changed.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 06:42 AM
  #4  
Txdragon's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,063
Likes: 287
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

In the case of a B series, the S2 pro may or may not be of benefit. I've noticed myself the similarities between an LS intake and the S2 pro are striking..

LS


S2 Pro


Maybe a slight upgrade due to longer runners but, **shrug**
If you were running a D series, I'd be more prone to say yes, definitely. So if an LS intake is a clear upgrade to what the B16 has on it, your choice is simple. If it's only mild or even lateral, look to another brand.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 11:24 AM
  #5  
K7-1Ktrevor's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,474
Likes: 46
From: Salem, Or
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

Don't let that picture fool you the ls p75 intake manifold is considerably different. It has long skinny curved runners and a much smaller plenum then the skunk2 does.

Reply
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 01:31 PM
  #6  
turboLScrx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 592
From: Bowling Green, ky, USA
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

I’m currently installing a Skunk2 Pro1 but will be changing over to the Skunk Utra Race since I expect to exceed 500hp

#teamskunk2 #skunk2#sponsored #skunk2racing
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 03:22 PM
  #7  
Txdragon's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,063
Likes: 287
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

Originally Posted by K7-1Ktrevor
Don't let that picture fool you the ls p75 intake manifold is considerably different. It has long skinny curved runners and a much smaller plenum then the skunk2 does.

Yeah, I see it on that side view now. Guess the pro would still be a good upgrade in terms of volume and flow. The straighter runners would certainly do some good. Aight, I DID say I wasn't sure. Lol!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 04:29 PM
  #8  
Honderachinaldo's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 196
Likes: 8
From: Ahonerachenaldo
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

I think S2 pro is intended to be port matched w whatever head and port work. Mine needs at least 20 thou off to match a mildly ported head but that's an H22
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 09:33 PM
  #9  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 242
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

Originally Posted by turboLScrx
I’m currently installing a Skunk2 Pro1 but will be changing over to the Skunk Utra Race since I expect to exceed 500hp

#teamskunk2 #skunk2#sponsored #skunk2racing
No need to waste your time. I'm over 540whp from even 7 years ago and didn't need an Ultra Street, with my Pro1 that i won't change. You'd make maybe 16whp more on the same boost level on an Ultra Street.

I never understood why people buy the same pay twice
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2019 | 01:40 AM
  #10  
extremeracer's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 540
Likes: 17
From: Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

I made 540whp on a Dynapack with a stock B16A intake manifold and 64mm throttle on a 84x89 engine (20 - 22 psi @ 5500ft elevation). Switching to a Victor X and cast Skunk2 throttle body did pick up top-end power and extend my powerband, but it wasn't a day and night difference.

My personal opinion; anything up to 500whp won't see huge gains from an upgraded intake manifold and the B16A manifold can go quite far. On a B18C1 the gains are probably more substantial as you getting rid of the dual-runner setup.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2019 | 02:12 AM
  #11  
1HGEJ2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 651
Likes: 6
From: Germany
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

which cams?@ extremeracer
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2019 | 03:22 AM
  #12  
AllMtrRex's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 26
From: NC
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

Where does the engine plan on spinning most of it's time at? If its over 8k all the time, drag race only....Then an aftermarket intake manifold would help. If not, just stay with OEM manifold, throttle body and ITR cams (and if you have money to waste, tuner 1 cams) and be done.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2019 | 04:40 AM
  #13  
extremeracer's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 540
Likes: 17
From: Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

Originally Posted by 1HGEJ2
which cams?@ extremeracer
"Crappy" Crower 63401T-2 - the turbo cam of the early 2000's. We never had access to GSR/ITR/CTR cams in our market.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2019 | 07:22 AM
  #14  
LightningTeg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
15 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,357
Likes: 22
From: Indiana
Default Re: Skunk2 Pro VS Stock B16a2 Intake for Turbo Application

Not worth it. Just add more PSI
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dcaustin156
Tech / Misc
1
Mar 11, 2014 06:48 AM
wantboost
Forced Induction
15
Mar 31, 2011 12:27 PM
EcRzFinesT
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
15
Mar 13, 2011 09:29 AM
cdubs777
Honda Prelude
6
Oct 5, 2009 02:36 PM
blue99sir
Tech / Misc
1
Jul 15, 2007 09:02 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 AM.