Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

SiR II (10 hp's over us counter part?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 05:36 AM
  #1  
AMG's Avatar
AMG
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,939
Likes: 2
From: FL
Default SiR II (10 hp's over us counter part?)

Just wondering how they get the 10 extra hp out of the jdm b16a2? Or is it just the result of the restrictions that the U.S. puts on the engine?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 05:45 AM
  #2  
4g4me's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
Default Re: SiR II (-SpoonfedEG-)

USDM B16a1/2/3 160hp, 111tq

JDM B16a(first gen 89-91) 160hp, 111tq

JDM B16a(second gen and newer) 170hp, 113tq

The ony difference in the two is the compression ratio. The usdm, and jdm 1st gen motors have 10.2:1 ratio, all the jdm 2nd and newer have 10.4:1 ratio.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 06:10 AM
  #3  
B18C5-EH2's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 16,612
Likes: 55
From: Southside ATL, GA
Default Re: SiR II (4g4me)

Compression and better octane fuel probably make up that 10hp.

I still like the JDM Second-Gen B16A because it's cheaper and really does outpower the U.s counterpart unlike some other JDM vs. USDM motors.

My girl's B16A2 pushed 143whp with i/h/e while my friend's JDM Second-Gen 170hp B16a laid down 150whp with only header and exhaust. Stock Civic piping with open tube.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 06:12 AM
  #4  
WAFFLES's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 1
From: Tulsa, OK
Default Re: SiR II (B18C5-EH2)

Compression and better octane fuel probably make up that 10hp.

I still like the JDM Second-Gen B16A because it's cheaper and really does outpower the U.s counterpart unlike some other JDM vs. USDM motors.

My girl's B16A2 pushed 143whp with i/h/e while my friend's JDM Second-Gen 170hp B16a laid down 150whp with only header and exhaust. Stock Civic piping with open tube.
yeah but isn't the 99-00 Si b16 underrated? It puts down about 150whp stock...pretty good.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 06:15 AM
  #5  
B18C5-EH2's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 16,612
Likes: 55
From: Southside ATL, GA
Default ....

No.

The post you quoted shows that my girl's B16A2 (from a 1999 Si) laid down 143whp with all bolt-ons. Oh yeah forgot to mention the re-chipped P28 as well.

That is typical.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 06:22 AM
  #6  
WAFFLES's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 1
From: Tulsa, OK
Default Re: .... (B18C5-EH2)

No.

The post you quoted shows that my girl's B16A2 (from a 1999 Si) laid down 143whp with all bolt-ons. Oh yeah forgot to mention the re-chipped P28 as well.

That is typical.

sounds like your girl got a bunk b16 143whp with boltons and a chipped p28...that would **** me off.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 06:32 AM
  #7  
94si94cx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: Palmetto, GA, United States
Default Re: .... (WAFFLES)

Actually it sounds about right. Thats about a 10% loss from flywheel to wheels after I/H/E. I'm not sure what average is without the I/H/E, but I would guess about 20%. So the motors sounds fine. 150 at the wheels stock just sounds rediculous.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 06:36 AM
  #8  
WAFFLES's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 1
From: Tulsa, OK
Default Re: .... (Siturbohybrid)

yeah i guess so...its been a weird morning, what can i say?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 06:39 AM
  #9  
94si94cx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: Palmetto, GA, United States
Default Re: .... (WAFFLES)

Yea, i know how that goes. I just got out of a physics lab where we had to calculate percent loss thats where those quick calculations came from. LOL even though they are prolly off. oh well. plus my car is acting crazy (see post) its pissing me off ::Sighs::
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 08:17 AM
  #10  
ce's Avatar
ce
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
Default Re: SiR II (B18C5-EH2)

My car had 140 whp stock...150 after H/E...Ditdn't gain top end at all with the AEM but got a lot of midrange...


[Modified by ce, 6:19 PM 10/31/2002]
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 08:43 AM
  #11  
AMG's Avatar
AMG
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,939
Likes: 2
From: FL
Default Re: SiR II (B18C5-EH2)

B18C5-EH2: Do you have any pics of your friends car?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 09:55 AM
  #12  
B18C5-EH2's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 16,612
Likes: 55
From: Southside ATL, GA
Default Re: SiR II (-SpoonfedEG-)

I might somewhere...i'll find some.

It was a 1992 Dx hatch in Tahitian Green on SSR Type C/Comp wheels.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 10:24 AM
  #13  
eg6ajk's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,490
Likes: 2
From: GTA, ON, Canada
Default Re: SiR II (B18C5-EH2)

my old JDM b16a dynoed (2nd gen) with the following:
rear section fireball, tanabe header, rest stock = 143whp and 102lb/ft of torque

my buddy's 1st gen B16a (JDM) in a EG (OBDI):
stock with a cone intake, rear section off a CRV = 142whp and 103lb/ft of torque

basically a 1st gen with most stock parts will do 138-142whp while a 2nd gen will have about 1-4whp more.

differences are cams, compression, ecu
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 11:21 AM
  #14  
Hooch'n's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 1
From: Notgrapebutgreat, S.C./N.C., USof A
Default Re: SiR II (eg6ajk)

...that is why I love my daily driven hatchcrap.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gofastgokart99
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
13
Dec 2, 2008 07:50 PM
DC4 Rasta
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
5
Jul 24, 2006 12:55 PM
dmckrazy45
Honda Prelude
4
May 25, 2005 06:11 AM
B16CRXT
Tech / Misc
14
Oct 1, 2003 07:53 PM
is3oo
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
13
Aug 19, 2001 11:09 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:22 AM.