my spool results of log vs tubular manifolds logs spool was faster but make was less

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 01:36 AM
  #1  
riceball777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A
Default my spool results of log vs tubular manifolds logs spool was faster but make was less

engine is a 100% stock f20c. The only thing that was changed was the turbo manifold. All manifolds are t3 single/open scroll. The turbo was a old school garrett ball bearing t3 50 trim with a 5 bolt .63 ar hotside. First manifold was a rev hard log. Second manifold was a mase tubular sidewinder. Third manifold was a trackforged tubular sidewinder eaqule length manifold.

First manifold is a rev hard log

blue line is the most boost I was able to run on 91 octane showing just under 10psi. Red line was e85.



second manifold is a mase manifold. This manifold along made 60whp more on 91 octane at almost the same boost level but spooled 800 rpm slower than the rev hard log manifold.


red line is 91 octane and blue line is e85


Third manifold is the trackforged. Notice the runners are much longer than the mase manifold and this manifold had all equal length runners. This manifold made all most the same exact power as the mase manifold but spool 200 rpm slower due to the longer runners.


This grap shows the spool of the trackforged vs the mase. This shows 200rpm slower spool of the trackforged manifold. Boost plots showing 91 octane and 11psi on both manifolds.


A picture of my current engine bay with the track forged manifold.



This tells my the ideal t3 single/opens open scroll manifold would have a merge collector with all the runners being as short as possible and that eaqule length does nothing for power production. The shorter the runners the faster the spool.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 04:23 AM
  #2  
LightningTeg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
15 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 22
From: Indiana
Default Re: my spool results of log vs tubular manifolds logs spool was faster but make was l

Good info
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 05:13 AM
  #3  
GEN2 LS's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 59
From: North Carolina
Default Re: my spool results of log vs tubular manifolds logs spool was faster but make was l

nice! been waiting for someone to do a test like this again. I always felt like that full race manifold test with the tubular log vs the ramhorn was a lil bias:p All in all which manifold setup was the most "fun" to drive around on the street with?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 05:34 AM
  #4  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 241
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: my spool results of log vs tubular manifolds logs spool was faster but make was l

Glad you did the test, though this further validates the theory that was located in the FAQs entitled "which manifold is for me?"
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 09:20 AM
  #5  
riceball777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A
Default Re: my spool results of log vs tubular manifolds logs spool was faster but make was l

Originally Posted by GEN2 LS
nice! been waiting for someone to do a test like this again. I always felt like that full race manifold test with the tubular log vs the ramhorn was a lil bias:p All in all which manifold setup was the most "fun" to drive around on the street with?
The perpose of this thread is just to show the differents in spool with different manifolds. But I would not ever recommend a log manifold for a s2000 as the s2000 flows so well it holds back power a great deal. On straight 91 octane I was only able to make about 340whp with the log manifold. With the tubular manifolds I make almost 400whp on straight 91 octane. Although the log manifold spooled noticeable faster and made more power under 4k rpm, the car fell on its face and had no top end power. Sort of felt like an Evo with a stock turbo but not as bad.

With the tubular manifold the cars top end power was much much better as I gained 60whp on straight 91 octane. These results were only exaggerated even more on e85/race gas.

For a street car for a t3 undivided setup u want a quality manifold that wont crack with a 4-1 mearge coolecter with the shortest runners possible.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2013 | 11:50 AM
  #6  
LightningTeg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
15 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 22
From: Indiana
Default Re: my spool results of log vs tubular manifolds logs spool was faster but make was l

AKA InlinePro
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 10:08 PM
  #7  
Tony the Tiger's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Default Re: my spool results of log vs tubular manifolds logs spool was faster but make was l

Thanks for the info... It's really good to see this type of data especially on an F20

I've had many unofficial tests on spool, but the relationship is never a "one size fits all" type of scenario though.

With a small turbine wheel, it's easy to saturate the manifold full of exhaust gases and spool up the turbo quickly. A small turbo will spool quickly with a short runner manifold and when the engine size vs turbo sizing is within very streetable regions. e.g. GT30R on a 2.0L

With a larger turbo, like a GT42R or bigger, it demands exhaust velocity at the turbine wheel to spool up. Because the turbine wheel is so big, it doesn't fully rely on bulk exhaust flow and pressure to spool the turbo, but rather the high exhaust velocity and energy to "crash" into the wheel and get it going. This is when longer runners can allow exhaust gases to maintain velocity, and along with a nice merge collector, it can achieve highest velocity just before the turbine wheel. With equal length in mind, it keeps the pulses evenly spaced for best spool up and response.

You will quickly find that a log manifold with a massive turbo will never spool up properly and very slow to reach peak turbine speed. For example, a B18C with a 67mm T4 turbo will simply hate a log manifold or any type of short runner unequal length manifold.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonySoprano
Forced Induction
7
Sep 11, 2009 06:14 PM
therunnerz
Classifieds: Forced Induction
10
Jun 4, 2009 08:54 PM
hbyrd8701
Forced Induction
19
Apr 13, 2009 10:55 AM
justinbailey
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
1
Apr 29, 2004 12:43 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:26 PM.