Honda Prelude All Model Preludes

95 m3 vs 00 SH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2002 | 09:06 PM
  #1  
stoopid215's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA, USA
Default 95 m3 vs 00 SH

my friend wants to run me in his stock 95 auto m3 ... how much do you guys think ill lose by.. or do i have any chance?i have a stock 00 sh


[Modified by stoopid215, 7:24 AM 10/1/2002]
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2002 | 09:15 PM
  #2  
Cottonwoodz's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 2
From: ROCKFORD, IL
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (stoopid215)

You shoudnt loose that bad or at all if its stock.A 95 Auto M3 runs really high 14's low 15's Stock. IMHO
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2002 | 09:52 PM
  #3  
Mike95lude's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish county, WA, USA
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (stoopid215)

You should still lose. Might as well try for fun though.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2002 | 09:55 PM
  #4  
del_parker's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
From: GA
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (stoopid215)

heh, no where nearly as bad as when i raced a zo6 and then a supra tt. i did notice how much closer to the ground the supra's exhaust piping was than mine...he had like 2" of clearance vs. my 3".
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2002 | 06:10 AM
  #5  
stoopid215's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA, USA
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (Mike95lude)

what if i had intake / exhaust ? a closer chance?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2002 | 07:56 AM
  #6  
DsITR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (stoopid215)

Ya, that would help. Make sure to take it into redline if using the stock tach, because it is incorrect. I can shift up at 8. 95 M3 have the least torque for that generation, in 96 displacement jumped up to 3.2L. and if its auto try to race it from a roll. here is the specs on a 95 M3.
240hp
225lb-ft
3240 curb weight.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2002 | 04:00 PM
  #7  
Boostless97Lude
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (dsludefosho)

you've got his *** of the line, BMW automatics suck, i had one, still do actually (not an M3, but an auto BMW) i/ve got a friend with an auto, and i have driven newer ones. DO NOT RACE ON A ROLL, YOU WILL LOOSE!!!! if you wanna win, race him from a dead stop, that's your only chance, but even then, you'll probably loose.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 12:53 AM
  #8  
NiMhist's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL, USA
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (Boosted97Lude)

Should be interesting
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 10:55 AM
  #9  
stoopid215's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA, USA
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (dsludefosho)

what do u mean the stock tach is incorrect? i usually shift from 1st to 2nd at 7300 rpm...it can go higher?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 03:13 PM
  #10  
doe's Avatar
doe
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: southern california
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (stoopid215)

what do u mean the stock tach is incorrect? i usually shift from 1st to 2nd at 7300 rpm...it can go higher?
If you want to get the most out of the engine, shift at 8k on the stock 5th gen tach.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 03:13 PM
  #11  
f0de's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Belmar, NJ, USA
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (stoopid215)

automatic m3's work fine.. a 2000 prelude sh couldn't launch on it either.. lol .. you got rear wheel drive vs front wheel drive.. if the person in the m3 knows how to launch.. she/he will kick your ***.. even after IHE and a shot.. i still doubt you'd have a chance.. and god forbid the m3 had a shot or work on it..
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 05:50 PM
  #12  
stoopid215's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA, USA
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (doe)

8k?!?! isn't that sorta bad for the engine ? and isnt that fuel cut off territory?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 06:17 PM
  #13  
Boostless97Lude
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (stoopid215)

it's at the rev limiter, no it's not bad, as long as you don't hit the limiter. i do it all the time. it's hard to learn, but i ended up buying and autometer tach witha shift light, which helped out tremendously. it's so much easier to get a good shift while still keeping all your attetnion to the road/track.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2002 | 07:35 PM
  #14  
stoopid215's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA, USA
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (Boosted97Lude)

so lets say im practicing and i hit the limiter over 8000rpm.... fuel cuts off.... bad on the engine i presume?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2002 | 11:44 AM
  #15  
f0de's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Belmar, NJ, USA
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (stoopid215)

nah thats not bad at all.. you should have a spark cut.. and not a fuel cut ideally on a built car.. but try it with nitrous on your stock rev limiter.. heh
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2002 | 08:57 PM
  #16  
el_Presidente's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, CA, USA
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (stoopid215)

well think of it this way, they put the limiter on the car for a reason. not that hard to figure out. just don't do it too much.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2002 | 09:22 PM
  #17  
1BadLude6986's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Alabaster, Alabama, USA
Default Re: 95 m3 vs 00 SH (el_Presidente)

i think u might have a little of a chance. try to get a few mods before u race him and itll be alot closer. im not completely sure, but i am also a prelude fan not a bmw.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WifesVTEC
Honda Prelude
2
Nov 12, 2005 08:58 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:00 PM.