Separate Wire for Tach to work
Does anybody know why you have to run a separate wire to make the tachometer work on certain swaps? I am sure it has to do with the combination of body harness + engine harness, but I want to know for sure. I would like to know why I had to run a wire to my distributor plug from one of the connectors on the driverside shock tower for my tach to work after my swap
'99-'00 Civics (excluding the Si and HX) have Engine Speed Output (signal for the tach) run off of the ECU, rather than the distributor. Where they have the 8-wire plug rather than a 9-wire plug. Does any of that pertain to the swap you're doing?
Maybe you should be a little more specific about what car you have, what harnesses & ECU you're using, and what engine you're putting in.
Maybe you should be a little more specific about what car you have, what harnesses & ECU you're using, and what engine you're putting in.
He has a 1992 Civic Si HB with JDM B18C (Type R) and what is supposed to be a 1997 USDM Integra GS-R engine harness. Currently he's running a jumper harness and a JDM P73 ECU.
Trending Topics
Right, I believe that is supposed to be it. I am wondering WHY it did not control my tach once I dropped in the OBD2 Type R USDM harness like plug and play. I had to run an extra wire directly from the DS shock tower connector to the distributor connector. My tach works perfectly now. I am just wondering WHY I had to do it, when I have heard of others just using an OBD2a harness in an EG swap and it works the tach plug and play.
Right, I believe that is supposed to be it. I am wondering WHY it did not control my tach once I dropped in the OBD2 Type R USDM harness like plug and play. I had to run an extra wire directly from the DS shock tower connector to the distributor connector. My tach works perfectly now. I am just wondering WHY I had to do it, when I have heard of others just using an OBD2a harness in an EG swap and it works the tach plug and play.
Maybe something in this thread has something to do with it?
https://honda-tech.com/forums/acura-integra-type-r-8/jdm-itr-ecu-tach-signal-different-than-usdm-2118063/
The only other thing I can find from a search is a LOT of people having the same issue. But I haven't seen a single answer as to why. I wish I had a copy of the '98-'01 Integra ETM to check it out myself.
https://honda-tech.com/forums/acura-integra-type-r-8/jdm-itr-ecu-tach-signal-different-than-usdm-2118063/
The only other thing I can find from a search is a LOT of people having the same issue. But I haven't seen a single answer as to why. I wish I had a copy of the '98-'01 Integra ETM to check it out myself.
Hmm.. well I was running a P28 at first, and my tach still didn't work. So this may mean that the USDM Type R engine harness I bought from a friend is a 2000-2001 one? I know the engine is a 96 JDM ITR.
Wait, wouldn't there be a noticeable difference in the 97-98 and the 00-01 Type R engine harness? If I knew what they were, I would go out and check if I see any of them on my harness.
We didn't get OBD2A ITRs over here in N. America; the Type R's were only sold here in '00-'01 (OBD2B). There would be differences between the models, which could narrow it down. The GS-R would have wiring for the IAB and the LS wouldn't have wiring for VTEC. But as for OBD2A vs OBD2B harness differences, I don't know. Seems this may be one of those "little" things that the Honda community may not have a definite answer for.
Haha, maybe I can't get a definite answer. But I thought I would try.
Also, there definitely WAS an OBD2A ITR in North America. 1997-1998 did exist in America. Japan got the 1996 which we didn't. And the 1999 did not exist anywhere.
Also, there definitely WAS an OBD2A ITR in North America. 1997-1998 did exist in America. Japan got the 1996 which we didn't. And the 1999 did not exist anywhere.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4dooreg-k
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
11
Jun 23, 2006 12:50 PM







