Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

mild gsr na build dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #1  
HondaManMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: santa rosa california
Default mild gsr na build dyno results

hey guys, i recently built and dyno'ed my car and im pretty happy with the results. any input would be appreciated as this is my first na project

mods are as follows
96 integra gsr, 160,xxx on bone stock bottom end
stock head, removed .020 relapped valves, new seals
skunk2 pro springs and retainers
skunk2 tuner 2 cams
skunk2 pro series intake manifold
blox 68mm throttle body
home made 3 inch cai
rc 310cc injectors
hytech replica header big tube
3 inch exhaust vibrant flatblack muffler
hondata s300

results
193 whp 124 ftlbs torque


Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 12:23 PM
  #2  
HondaManMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: santa rosa california
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

sorry about the crappy pics
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 03:12 PM
  #3  
OH_1fstgsr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Dublin, OH, USA
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

On a bone stock bottom end. 10:1 compression. Really good numbers. A/F can use a little more clean up.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 03:15 PM
  #4  
S2Integra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 757
Likes: 2
From: NW Ohio
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

Almost exact same setup as mine but I have 184 whp and 124 ft/lbs. You have bigger piping than I do is all.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #5  
System Lord's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 03:48 PM
  #6  
C-Rex1021's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: Capital Region, NY, USA
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

My plan in terms of the head, but I wanted to do ITR pistons. Bump for some good numbers
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 03:49 PM
  #7  
redGSRguy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, CA
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

Not bad! Must be a world of difference from before. My gsr build did 205/130 with blox c's and jdm itr pistons and it was WAY more fun than stock =P.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 03:51 PM
  #8  
vtaker's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: The People's Republik of Kalifornia
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

nice numbers. it really shows the potential of these vtak engines
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2010 | 08:16 PM
  #9  
HondaManMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: santa rosa california
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

thanks guys, i was pretty happy with the numbers, more than i expected for sure. still not enough though what else should i do?? p73 pistons, sk2 pro3, balanced and rev to 10 im thinking
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2010 | 02:08 AM
  #10  
artin01's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: glendale, ca, usa
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

thats very good.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2010 | 04:11 PM
  #11  
94VTEC2TONE's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 1
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

not bad numbers looks like the graph is a little choppy though
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2010 | 05:36 PM
  #12  
HondaManMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: santa rosa california
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

i was having some ignition breakup in the high rpms. i need to get rid of the msd and stick with stock
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 07:50 AM
  #13  
94VTEC2TONE's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 1
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

ohh ok. ya msd just seems to blow on our cars
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2010 | 09:35 PM
  #14  
HondaManMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: santa rosa california
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

yeah, the factory honda ignition systems are really hard to improve upon, i figured id give msd the benifit of the doubt and try it out, turns out it was a bad idea
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 09:23 AM
  #15  
slateEKsi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: pothole usa PA
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

hows your gas mileage with this setup ?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 12:28 PM
  #16  
Schister66's Avatar
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

The tune leaves something to be desired, but you made good power regardless
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 09:14 PM
  #17  
HondaManMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: santa rosa california
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

yeah, there is more in it, the fuel mileage is really good actually, i got 28mpg last tank and i was beating on it. as far as the cams are concerned, i dont reccomend them with anything less than 12:1 as they dont make any power until after 7k and start trailing off around 8500. this is a horribly useless powerband and i was really expecting more useability
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2010 | 02:13 PM
  #18  
Pinner13's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 236
Likes: 1
From: jersey
Default Re: mild gsr na build dyno results

i know bim bringing this back up but is 68mm to big?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
V-SPEC 1
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
25
Jul 19, 2016 10:05 AM
Lozano1991
Acura Integra
4
May 24, 2013 07:56 PM
TnC
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
43
Sep 24, 2012 06:52 PM
92cxturbo
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
17
Oct 18, 2010 09:08 AM
turbojdmsol
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
12
Jan 17, 2010 02:44 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:08 PM.