i know this sounds very noobish and i tried searching but was very unsuccessful. i need to know the difference between itr and regular integra suspension as far as shocks and coilovers are concerned. im looking for new suspension and half of these sites show the same damn picture for type r and non type r but they say this is not for type r and blah blah but it all looks the same. i always thought if you changed your lca's to aftermarket ones like F2, blox, skunk2, etc., that you could use itr shocks or coilovers ment for itr's. can someone clarify this for me.

i just want to know...when i get new lca's what shocks/full coilovers do i look for, type r, or non type r? i have an ls. is there any advantage to having the type r style lca's or shocks/coilovers?

sorry for noob Q's


Modified by yc_dc4mar at 5:01 PM 7/26/2008

 

The ITR rear struts use the eye-type as opposed to the fork-type on non-ITRs. So, when you buy struts, you will need to buy for a non-ITR unless you buy either OEM ITR LCAs or Function7 type-r style LCAs.

ITR LCAs




Function7 type-r style LCAs




Non-ITR style LCAs

 

is there any difference between the two as far as performance or durability or anything...i dont see why honda chose that style for the itr

 

I believe it allows for more negative camber in a stock package. Same LCA as CRX, no?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by omnirage &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I believe it allows for more negative camber in a stock package. Same LCA as CRX, no?</TD></TR></TABLE>

really? i dont see why i would want my camber to go more than its already possible to go as it is. ok well thanks for all the info