another h22 dyno chart
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: k20 eater, k20, k20 eater
another h22 dyno chart
I am getting the dyno sheet emailed to me and i will post it as soon as i get it but we made 280 and 180.
H22a4 block sleeved and bored to 89 mm
Je 13.0 - 1 pistons
crower maxi light rods
twm 50 mm itbs
kazikan balance shaft removal kit
port flow head
crane vtec elimantor cams
ferrea followers
Looking at aem coil packs and piecing a dry sump for the motor
H22a4 block sleeved and bored to 89 mm
Je 13.0 - 1 pistons
crower maxi light rods
twm 50 mm itbs
kazikan balance shaft removal kit
port flow head
crane vtec elimantor cams
ferrea followers
Looking at aem coil packs and piecing a dry sump for the motor
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,074
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL, ca, 91702
Re: another h22 dyno chart (SIXTY)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SIXTY »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">tq seems low for 280, i made 190 tq with only 240 whp.</TD></TR></TABLE>
torque #'s do seem quite low.
torque #'s do seem quite low.
Trending Topics
King of the One Liners
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,485
Likes: 2
From: Jersey, USA
Re: (lengualoco21)
Well since you have access to VP stuff-
Try C14 plus . Its still oxygenated, its a lighter fuel and burns cooler.
I planned on doing a comparison between q16 and c14plus just to see what would happen
Try C14 plus . Its still oxygenated, its a lighter fuel and burns cooler.
I planned on doing a comparison between q16 and c14plus just to see what would happen
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Re: (2fastGSR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2fastGSR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well since you have access to VP stuff-
Try C14 plus . Its still oxygenated, its a lighter fuel and burns cooler.
I planned on doing a comparison between q16 and c14plus just to see what would happen</TD></TR></TABLE>
C14+
Try C14 plus . Its still oxygenated, its a lighter fuel and burns cooler.
I planned on doing a comparison between q16 and c14plus just to see what would happen</TD></TR></TABLE>
C14+
King of the One Liners
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,485
Likes: 2
From: Jersey, USA
Re: (FST GSR 1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FST GSR 1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">C16 </TD></TR></TABLE>
Care to explain why?
This is directly from a VP rep's mouth:
C16 is not really intended for naturally aspirated applications. While it may work well with some extremely high compression, large displacement motors , it was not really intended for naturally aspirated import applications. Turbo motors are another story.
It is too heavy of a fuel and is un oxygenated. An oxygenated fuel such as q16 or c14+ will always yield better results.
But hey thats just what VP themselves say. Maybe they are wrong
</TD></TR></TABLE>Care to explain why?
This is directly from a VP rep's mouth:
C16 is not really intended for naturally aspirated applications. While it may work well with some extremely high compression, large displacement motors , it was not really intended for naturally aspirated import applications. Turbo motors are another story.
It is too heavy of a fuel and is un oxygenated. An oxygenated fuel such as q16 or c14+ will always yield better results.
But hey thats just what VP themselves say. Maybe they are wrong
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jnv255
Forced Induction
46
Dec 19, 2011 03:25 PM
