turbo vs supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 02:22 PM
  #1  
Mikej425's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: 256, AL, United States
Default turbo vs supercharger

I have a b20b with gsr head in my ek. Titanium valves, springs, and retainers and stock other than that. Its my dd but im wantin to go f/I and im having trouble deciding between setting up for a turbo or a supercharger. Any opinions would be appreciated
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #2  
r3vmixman's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Sunny Daygo, Ca, USA
Default Re: turbo vs supercharger (Mikej425)

What is your goal in horsepower / tq gains? Personally I'd go turbo if I had to choose one cuz the b20 has enough low end power already.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #3  
Mikej425's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: 256, AL, United States
Default Re: turbo vs supercharger (r3vmixman)

Well I don't have any specific goals really just basically want a fast dd.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 04:04 PM
  #4  
1992Si's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 8
From: Tolland, CT, USA
Default Re: turbo vs supercharger (Mikej425)

Have you looked in the Forced Induction forum?

Most of us go Turbo.

Many more options that way.

Find a tuner in your area from the sticky in that forum. Talk with him and figure out what your next step is.


Reply
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 04:37 PM
  #5  
Mikej425's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: 256, AL, United States
Default Re: turbo vs supercharger (1992Si)

no i didn't even think of that


thanks for the advice and info tho!
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 05:48 PM
  #6  
goldex420's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: a shop near u, WI, usa
Default

a supercharger is power in lower rpms
turbo is power 4000 to redline, at least mine is cant really speak for any one else, but i say go turbo ull love it
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2008 | 08:19 PM
  #7  
94delslo's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Texas, USA
Default Re: (goldex420)

ive gone the supercharger route and trust me when i say that you will be SO much happier with a turbo set up.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 05:26 AM
  #8  
rmcdaniels's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 3
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Default Re: turbo vs supercharger (Mikej425)

If you don't really know why you would want a SC, then a turbo is probably a better option for you.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 06:52 AM
  #9  
totsie7944's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in MD, MD, USA
Default Re: turbo vs supercharger (rmcdaniels)

If you build it right, with the right parts, bore, etc, you can virtually eliminate turbo lag even with a turbo as big as a GT35r.

I made 550 whp/ 380 ft lbs on my first turbo build a month ago on 93 octane running the Fullrace AC GT stage 3 kit with the 35R, .82 and my power curve looks just like a all motor car.

I went with a 84x89 build and have instant power off the line. The power curve from 1000rpms on, is ABOVE my Jenvey ITB setup that made 220 whp. So I am just saying, if you do it right, turbo can be as good off the line and better on top end.

For instance I have a buddy with a 450/500 2003 Cobra Mustang, we did a pull (safely fellas, no one was around) on the beltway. Him in 2nd gear IN HIS POWER BAND, and me in 3rd around 3,000 rpms...when we hit it, he pulled maybe 4 feet ahead (ie my drivers door at his back seat) and then I pulled right up next to him and passed him with ease by the end of 3rd.

It kind of depends on how much money you have to spend, if you want to keep AC and PS, etc. Seeing as how its your DD though, I assume you want to keep AC and PS, and it can get VERY expensive doing that with a turbo like I just did. Looking back I should have just gotten a Corvette and thrown a head/cam/spray on it and saved myself some money haha
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 08:56 AM
  #10  
Mikej425's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: 256, AL, United States
Default Re: turbo vs supercharger (totsie7944)

Thanks for all the advice and info guys
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #11  
Tippyman's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,846
Likes: 0
From: VA, USA
Default Re: turbo vs supercharger (Mikej425)

Reply
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #12  
chimmike's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
From: Parrish, FL
Default Re: turbo vs supercharger (Tippyman)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tippyman &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> </TD></TR></TABLE>

+1. Was this thread really necessary? I mean, aren't there already a dozen of these listed in the

<U>*F*A*Q*</U> section?
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 12:30 PM
  #13  
Mikej425's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: 256, AL, United States
Default Re: turbo vs supercharger (chimmike)

If you think it's un-neccesary why would you open it and/or post in it. This post started in a model specific forum anyways. If you don't have anything positive or helpful to say gtfo and go bother somebody else
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sasinorm01
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
9
Mar 21, 2007 01:21 PM
99redb16a
Welding / Fabrication
29
Jul 7, 2005 10:42 PM
CivicSmkYa21
Forced Induction
52
May 19, 2004 10:06 AM
v0d0o
Forced Induction
86
Feb 3, 2004 10:19 AM
1BadLude6986
Honda Prelude
31
Oct 12, 2002 02:47 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 AM.