Honda Civic (2006 - 2015) 2006 - 2015 Civic Forums

Auto vs Manual Transmission

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2008 | 04:23 PM
  #1  
94sol's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsburg, PA, USA
Default Auto vs Manual Transmission

Hello, I'm considering buying a 08 LX sedan. When looking around the lot I noticed the automatic transmission gets better highway MPG then the manual. I was surprised by this. Can any one explain this? I've read the threads about gas mileage on these cars and it seems to very a lot depending on driving conditions. I'm currently driving a 92 LX sedan and getting on average 36 mpg 70/30 highway/city. Should I expect about the same from an 08?

Anything else I should know about when looking?

Thanks in advance
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #2  
Nighthawk R18's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: SoCAL
Default Re: Auto vs Manual Transmission (94sol)

i asked the dealership the same question you have and they said that with the new cars or technology the automatic gets better mpg's. cant really explain it but
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 04:49 AM
  #3  
jaepalm's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD, USA
Default Re: Auto vs Manual Transmission (Nighthawk R18)

I'm finished with college so i could give a sh*t about "extensive research" but Edmunds.com, a very reliable source, lists the manual Si as getting 5 more MPGs in both categories as opposed to the auto. In addition, manuals are usually around a full K cheaper. Read the end of my signature, it says it all.

While i was waiting for Honda to rotate my tires i drove a brand new Accord V6 automatic (270 hp!!!) Did NOT impressive me. Terribly slow throttle response and no more kick then my Si with two bolt-ons. My buddy has an automatic Firebird, we never let him forget it.

Its just MY opinion but unless you have a bum left knee from football (i do but I man up and push through it during rush hour traffic) or your just plain lazy, manual F.T.W.
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 08:30 AM
  #4  
a1staecksauce's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
From: Westminster/Huntington Beach/Seal Beach, CA, United States
Default Re: Auto vs Manual Transmission (jaepalm)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jaepalm &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm finished with college so i could give a sh*t about "extensive research" but Edmunds.com, a very reliable source, lists the manual Si as getting 5 more MPGs in both categories as opposed to the auto. In addition, manuals are usually around a full K cheaper. Read the end of my signature, it says it all.

While i was waiting for Honda to rotate my tires i drove a brand new Accord V6 automatic (270 hp!!!) Did NOT impressive me. Terribly slow throttle response and no more kick then my Si with two bolt-ons. My buddy has an automatic Firebird, we never let him forget it.

Its just MY opinion but unless you have a bum left knee from football (i do but I man up and push through it during rush hour traffic) or your just plain lazy, manual F.T.W.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Doesn't sound very reliable to me if they say the SI comes in manual or automatic forms.
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 08:45 AM
  #5  
jaepalm's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD, USA
Default Re: Auto vs Manual Transmission (a1staecksauce)



<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by a1staecksauce &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Doesn't sound very reliable to me if they say the SI comes in manual or automatic forms. </TD></TR></TABLE>


uh, whatever you say. Anyway Si only comes manual.
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 09:32 AM
  #6  
ialreadygotawristwatch's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: bif bang pow
Default

I'm thinking the difference in the automatic vs. the manual would have to do with a taller fifth gear or final drive. I don't know the ratios though so I couldn't tell you for sure. Honda is saying on there website that you'll get about 34 on the highway, which would be a far cry from the numbers you are currently seeing on your '92.

As far as the Si posting better numbers than any of the other Civics, I'd be extremely leery of that claim.
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 10:51 AM
  #7  
dmnall's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Goleta, CA, USA
Default

Well my guess is with the Auto aka Slushbox, they can control the points on where the shift points are and control it better versus a manual. I am surprised to see a slushbox get better mileage then a manual since the auto weighs more and uses more power then a manual. Since I bought a 08 Si Sedan because I wanted a manual and that is the best way to get because the car only comes with a manual.. Very similar to the Integra GSR, manual only!

Charlie
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 12:20 PM
  #8  
Curiouz_G's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 1
From: Fairfax, VA, USA
Default

1 word. gears.

how many gears does the auto have and how many does the manual have? with lower gears, the higher speed your at, the higher rpms your at. with more gears, you can cruise at a lower RPM at higher speeds, thus giving you better gas mileage. 5 gears vs 6 gears. on the same motor, the one with more gears gets better gas mileage.
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #9  
accordselux's Avatar
Me Gusta History
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,418
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Curiouz_G)

Si is geared for performance with a sixth long highway gear.

The gears are shorter otherwise.

The base auto has only 5 gears but gets much better economy due to the gear ratios.
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 01:54 PM
  #10  
dannysk89's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default Re: Auto vs Manual Transmission (94sol)

I'm pretty sure that two of the five forward gears in the auto are overdrive gears, which should definitely make a difference. I'm also pretty certain that the manual's ratios are much shorter than the autos, which was mentioned above
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 11:40 PM
  #11  
yuning83's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Franklin, WI, USA
Default Re: Auto vs Manual Transmission (dannysk89)

yeah you should get about the same mpg with the 08 lx
Reply
Old May 27, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #12  
jewjew bean's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Default Re: Auto vs Manual Transmission (yuning83)

most autos have better gear ratios for high speed cruising. The torque converter also locks up eliminating the loss in power. this usually gives them better gas mileage on the highway
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 08:05 AM
  #13  
deucetrice's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA
Default Re: Auto vs Manual Transmission (94sol)

let me tell you my expirience 94sol, I am FA Squad member 144 and i have and lx 4 door. It's an auto. and i made a mistake and now i wish i had a manual. im definetley a more spirited driver. so i now regret the decision i had made on the tranny. when i feel like stepping on the gas it's really annoying to know that i cant control the gears. i feel that my car is kinda gutless cause i cant control when to change up. so my point is, if you are a spirited driver like many other people on this forum, don't worry about the gas mileage so much cause it's really a miniscule difference. my words to you is just to get what you LIKE and you will definetley lower the chance for regrets ......I shoulda got the sunroof!!FAK ME!!!!
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 10:31 AM
  #14  
snake bit's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Hurricane, wv, usa
Default Re: Auto vs Manual Transmission (deucetrice)

As stated already, it's nothing more than gearing. At 75 MPH, the automatic is turning around 2500RPM while the manual is close to 3500RPM. An automatic is less efficient than a manual but that difference is more than compensated for by the almost 1000 lower cruising RPM.

I originally wanted a manual mainly because they are less expensive. However, I drive 35000 or so miles a year, mostly interstate, and it only took about five minutes of the test drive to figure out that 3500RPM plus cruising would drive me nuts.

By the way, I average 38 to 40 MPG consistently (90/10 highway/city) cruising at 73 to 75MPH. My best has been almost 45 MPG on a trip that was mostly two lane country roads with a 55PM speed limit - I averaged 60 to 64MPH.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WhiteEKgsr
Tech / Misc
3
Jul 27, 2008 08:03 PM
vietherbs
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
1
Sep 9, 2007 08:38 PM
DougNuts
Honda Civic (2006 - 2015)
27
Aug 5, 2006 11:42 PM
shellshock
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
11
May 8, 2006 02:03 PM
ukvtec
Honda Prelude
7
Aug 20, 2004 08:19 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:13 AM.