Precision SC61 vs. Garrett GT3076R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2008 | 09:04 PM
  #1  
J-Spot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Default Precision SC61 vs. Garrett GT3076R

Which turbo would you prefer on a Built GSR with the PEAKBOOST TOPMOUNT KIT?? My hatch will be weekend driven only for the streets. I'm gettin a awesome deal that I can't refuse from one of the sponsors and I want to know if anyone else is running either or on the same setup or for the two different turbo's?? How identical are they in specs?? How do you like it compared to each other?? which one is a better all around turbo?? Just curious and who's running what and how do you like the response. Thanks in advance.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 05:00 AM
  #2  
chimmike's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
From: Parrish, FL
Default Re: Precision SC61 vs. Garrett GT3076R (J-Spot)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J-Spot &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Which turbo would you prefer on a Built GSR with the PEAKBOOST TOPMOUNT KIT?? My hatch will be weekend driven only for the streets. I'm gettin a awesome deal that I can't refuse from one of the sponsors and I want to know if anyone else is running either or on the same setup or for the two different turbo's?? How identical are they in specs?? How do you like it compared to each other?? which one is a better all around turbo?? Just curious and who's running what and how do you like the response. Thanks in advance. </TD></TR></TABLE>

I would say the SC61 will make more power, depending on the size, but the 3076 will have better midrange response.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 05:00 AM
  #3  
harhoosh's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: Manama, Bahrain, Bahrain
Default Re: Precision SC61 vs. Garrett GT3076R (J-Spot)

B20/vtec, sc6152e @ 0.9 bar

the # is in my sign.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 05:22 AM
  #4  
morgan@synapse motorsport's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,278
Likes: 0
From: upstate, ny
Default Re: Precision SC61 vs. Garrett GT3076R (J-Spot)

what are your power goals?
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 06:57 AM
  #5  
champLSinteg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: East Bay, CA, USA
Default Re: Precision SC61 vs. Garrett GT3076R (mike@synapse motorsport)

SC61 is similar to the GT35 so you are pretty much comparing a GT35 to a GT30. The GT35 has more power potential so...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mike@synapse motorsport &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what are your power goals?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 04:09 PM
  #6  
J-Spot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Default Re: Precision SC61 vs. Garrett GT3076R (mike@synapse motorsport)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mike@synapse motorsport &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what are your power goals?</TD></TR></TABLE>

I'm shooting for anywhere between 400-450whp atleast...
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #7  
Schister66's Avatar
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

If you're looking for 400-450whp, the GT30r (or even the BW S256/S258) would be the better choice for you.
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #8  
tannerLSt's Avatar
ME LOVE U LONG TIME
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,246
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Default Re: Precision SC61 vs. Garrett GT3076R (J-Spot)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J-Spot &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I'm shooting for anywhere between 400-450whp atleast... </TD></TR></TABLE>
i made 437whp 81.5mm bore, stock sleeves , stock head.... with the sc61 on 20psi
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #9  
J-Spot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Default Re: Precision SC61 vs. Garrett GT3076R (tannerLSt)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tannerLSt &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i made 437whp 81.5mm bore, stock sleeves , stock head.... with the sc61 on 20psi</TD></TR></TABLE>

what was your set up?? RAMHORN?? what intake mani were you running?? pistons??? LMK your setup sounds very promising..
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 04:03 PM
  #10  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 241
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: (Schister66)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Schister66 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If you're looking for 400-450whp, the GT30r (or even the BW S256/S258) would be the better choice for you. </TD></TR></TABLE>

SC61 is a bit overkill unless going for more topend power. The topmount manifold helps with that, but will affect response quite a bit with the smaller units.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 05:17 PM
  #11  
kamAccord's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: (TheShodan)

Go with the SC6176. It spools great and has good topend.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #12  
black_EM1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,616
Likes: 10
Default Re: (kamAccord)

I'd say if you're going for 400-450, get the 30R.

81.5MM PoorMann's R with 01 ITR cams and forged internals. Stock otherwise.

Numbers are in sig.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #13  
ebydrc's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: in the shop, usa
Default

for your power goals i would opt for a gt30r, they are way underrated, your get nice response compared to that journal bearing sc61 which is larger as well. the gt30r will hit your goal no problem
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #14  
champLSinteg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
From: East Bay, CA, USA
Default Re: (ebydrc)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tannerLSt &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i made 437whp 81.5mm bore, stock sleeves , stock head.... with the sc61 on 20psi</TD></TR></TABLE>
What motor was this on? Seems a little low for 20psi on a sc61. I am making 416 at 15psi with a t3/t4 60trim. A buddy of mine made 457 on 16psi with the sc61. All on pump gas.

OP, if you want to make at least 450 then go for the sc61.
Reply
Old May 17, 2008 | 11:57 AM
  #15  
J-Spot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Default Re: (champLSinteg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by champLSinteg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What motor was this on? Seems a little low for 20psi on a sc61. I am making 416 at 15psi with a t3/t4 60trim. A buddy of mine made 457 on 16psi with the sc61. All on pump gas.

OP, if you want to make at least 450 then go for the sc61.</TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah I'm waiting for his response because you guys are pumping your more than him but would like to know what's in his setup...
Reply
Old May 17, 2008 | 07:40 PM
  #16  
HiProfile's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 7
From: b00sting my D16s, SoWis, USA
Default Re: (J-Spot)

It might have been the dyno, as I've seen several semi-build 1.8's do 400-415whp with a 57trim @21-23psi.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IGotVTECyo
Forced Induction
7
Feb 12, 2008 08:44 PM
4175017
Acura Integra
18
Nov 14, 2006 06:22 AM
Todapwr
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
8
Mar 4, 2004 12:09 PM
animalboxcutter
Forced Induction
3
Apr 24, 2003 11:40 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:04 AM.