I got a questin about a b18c1 and b18c5
I have a 95 gsr and I am in the process of building a extra motor for it. I already have a built gsr head and I have now came across a type r block for a 1/2 way good price. I really was looking for a gsr block but I dont think I can pass thins deal up. I guess my question would be before I buy it would be will everything be the same and will I run into any problems with my gsr head on the b18c5 block? Or do you think I should wait and get a gsr block
man if your getting a deal grab that asap you will have higher compression and if you have a decent head that thing should rip just take your time get the head milled and do arp head studs type r all the way
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jeb97gsr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> I guess my question would be before I buy it would be will everything be the same and will I run into any problems with my gsr head on the b18c5 block? Or do you think I should wait and get a gsr block</TD></TR></TABLE>
You've never heard of someone running a GSR head on a type R block before???? where do you live? Do you even read about any of the setups on here??
FYI- a type R block is basically a GSR block with slightly different pistons and crank...with that being said, why wouldn't it work? logic?
You've never heard of someone running a GSR head on a type R block before???? where do you live? Do you even read about any of the setups on here??
FYI- a type R block is basically a GSR block with slightly different pistons and crank...with that being said, why wouldn't it work? logic?
I thought it was almost (or was) the same. And it is just the block and the crank not the pistons and rods. But I wanted that anyway because I am thinking of building a turbo motor so I dint want the higher comp. pistons any how. On another note do you think 300 is ok for the block and crank. It has not been bored and it does not need to be eather.
Modified by jeb97gsr at 9:00 AM 2/27/2008
Modified by jeb97gsr at 9:00 AM 2/27/2008
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jeb97gsr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I thought it was almost (or was) the same. And it is just the block and the crank not the pistons and rods. But I wanted that anyway because I am thinking of building a turbo motor so I dint want the higher comp. pistons any how. On another note do you think 300 is ok for the block and crank. It has not been bored and it does not need to be eather.</TD></TR></TABLE>
The specs are the same (deck height, stroke, rod length). Piston domes are different. Thats basically it, just the pistons.
If you're building a turbo setup, why post this in all motor?
300 for block and crank isn't bad. But is that ALL you're getting?
The specs are the same (deck height, stroke, rod length). Piston domes are different. Thats basically it, just the pistons.
If you're building a turbo setup, why post this in all motor?
300 for block and crank isn't bad. But is that ALL you're getting?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



but yea It is just a block and crank I think.I am going to look at it this weekend.
