Honda Accord (1990 - 2002) Includes 1997 - 1999 Acura CL

AEM vs. K&N

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2007 | 08:59 PM
  #1  
tpot90's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
From: buena park, ca, usa
Default AEM vs. K&N

I found an AEM Dryflow filter for $46 including s&h. Do you think AEM would be a better choice than K&N? I think K&N is even a little more expensive, and its just a universal filter.

What do you think? AEM?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 05:40 AM
  #2  
The-Kid's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 3
From: Orange County, CA
Default Re: AEM vs. K&N (tpot90)

I have never tried DryFlow before. I know they are easier to maintain. But I've never seen much Dynos on those. But I know for sure K&N is proven. On some websites, people say AEM dryflow filters out little particles. But of course with that little particle, less power...

I have 3 K&N type filters. I like em very much. Though one thing that sucks about them, it's the time of servicing them. It almost took me 4 hours just to clean one of those filter. Well most of them is drying time. I guess same goes for the AEM dryflow.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LSintegra
Acura Integra
4
Mar 16, 2006 03:57 AM
Leo
Acura Integra Type-R
7
Dec 16, 2002 09:55 AM
slvrcivic97
Tech / Misc
4
Nov 5, 2002 05:26 PM
TypeR1558
Acura Integra Type-R
19
Aug 21, 2002 01:04 PM
feriocious
Acura Integra
12
Aug 6, 2002 06:03 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:23 AM.