1992-1995 civic hb CX miles per gallon
I have a '93 civic hb CX(bone stock) and ive been getting like 220 miles per tank.
i was just wondering if this was normal and if you could post what mpg you get.
thanks
daniel
i was just wondering if this was normal and if you could post what mpg you get.
thanks
daniel
when my cx was bone stock i would get like 400-450 MPT... but now i get like 250 MPT with my b16 swap .... so something seems off about your MPT .... sounds like u have a heavy foot
theres my old numbers
theres my old numbers
B16 in 2000 coupe, get around 29 on the highway. A few weeks ago I went to fill up to see where my mileage was at, the tank went empty at 185 miles. Thats not right, so I pulled the back seat up and did a resistance check on the fuel sender, got 49.6 Ohms of resistance, near a half tank of gas in there, was also confirmed by pulling the fuel pump cover off and looking in the tank. Put almost a 100 miles on that tank with the gas light on. (and a 2 gallon spare in the back, just in case.)
So in a nutshell, my fuel gauge is WAY OFF after a half a tank.
So in a nutshell, my fuel gauge is WAY OFF after a half a tank.
You should be getting 35/43 mpg stock, according to http://www.fueleconomy.gov
Trending Topics
I'm kind of in the same boat...got a lightweight VX (gutted DD) w/ a z6 motor swap (vx tranny though). I get 220/240 miles per tank on the 9.9 gal tank. Thinking it's the custom N/A tune making it run rich all the time. When at idle it loops like a cam'd v8!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MilanoRed_dc2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Another reason that your gas mileage could be going down is your oxygen sensor, make sure its clean and doesn't need replacing. </TD></TR></TABLE>
... but don't "clean" it with anything.
... but don't "clean" it with anything.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ef_hatchback
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
6
Jul 21, 2013 06:10 PM
RATEDR
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
12
Mar 22, 2002 04:29 AM





