pics of my new triple disc
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbotypeR@SPEC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Got my new triple disc in and went to the track.....now I need a new trans
</TD></TR></TABLE>
J/K, looks good but I've heard some bad things about Spec clutches.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
J/K, looks good but I've heard some bad things about Spec clutches.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Turbocivic94 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nice clutch....
what's the retail on one of those?</TD></TR></TABLE>
IM me for details.
what's the retail on one of those?</TD></TR></TABLE>
IM me for details.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FUCATYPR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
J/K, looks good but I've heard some bad things about Spec clutches.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have been using them, sold and installed them and haven't had any problems.
J/K, looks good but I've heard some bad things about Spec clutches.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have been using them, sold and installed them and haven't had any problems.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Running925 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not a bad way to spend 10 grand
</TD></TR></TABLE>
what?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
what?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbotypeR@SPEC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
what?</TD></TR></TABLE>
it was a joke! read the whole post
what?</TD></TR></TABLE>
it was a joke! read the whole post
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Running925 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
it was a joke! read the whole post
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Sorry, read the whole post and new it was a joke, but I still don't get it
it was a joke! read the whole post
</TD></TR></TABLE>Sorry, read the whole post and new it was a joke, but I still don't get it
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbotypeR@SPEC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Sorry, read the whole post and new it was a joke, but I still don't get it</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Vin Diesel »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Not a bad way to spend 10 grand </TD></TR></TABLE>
watch Fast and the Furious once....
Sorry, read the whole post and new it was a joke, but I still don't get it</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Vin Diesel »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Not a bad way to spend 10 grand </TD></TR></TABLE>
watch Fast and the Furious once....
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Schister66 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
watch Fast and the Furious once....</TD></TR></TABLE>
I try not to watch that crap. That is why I didn't catch it.
watch Fast and the Furious once....</TD></TR></TABLE>
I try not to watch that crap. That is why I didn't catch it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbotypeR@SPEC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I try not to watch that crap. That is why I didn't catch it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Its pretty much the best movie ever.
I try not to watch that crap. That is why I didn't catch it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Its pretty much the best movie ever.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbotypeR@SPEC »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I try not to watch that crap. That is why I didn't catch it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
You must not watch ANY tv
On topic: What do those retail at? Looks beefy
I try not to watch that crap. That is why I didn't catch it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
You must not watch ANY tv
On topic: What do those retail at? Looks beefy
more than you can afford.... paaal...
ok yeah, another shameless f&f ricer quote. I cannot help it when setup so perfectly. back to the topic once agian.
ok yeah, another shameless f&f ricer quote. I cannot help it when setup so perfectly. back to the topic once agian.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Civicman86 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
You must not watch ANY tv
On topic: What do those retail at? Looks beefy</TD></TR></TABLE>
I really don't watch much tv. I am in the garage if I am home.
IM me for pricing
You must not watch ANY tv
On topic: What do those retail at? Looks beefy</TD></TR></TABLE>
I really don't watch much tv. I am in the garage if I am home.
IM me for pricing
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Turbocivic94 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nice clutch....
what's the retail on one of those?</TD></TR></TABLE>
more than you can afford pal......
what's the retail on one of those?</TD></TR></TABLE>
more than you can afford pal......
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by R@mon »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
more than you can afford pal......</TD></TR></TABLE>
wow.. second time in this same thread.. Original.
rofll it is a nice clutch.. I wonder how much it costs too...
Still making the same amount of power as in your sig?
more than you can afford pal......</TD></TR></TABLE>
wow.. second time in this same thread.. Original.
rofll it is a nice clutch.. I wonder how much it costs too...
Still making the same amount of power as in your sig?
musta missed that.
either way, thats the reason for going with a triple plate if the disks are still the same diameter as a twin disk.looks like just more weight. Especially if, as is, twins can hold a **** load of torque.. Too much power for a twin?.............
either way, thats the reason for going with a triple plate if the disks are still the same diameter as a twin disk.looks like just more weight. Especially if, as is, twins can hold a **** load of torque.. Too much power for a twin?.............
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by R@mon »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">musta missed that.
either way, thats the reason for going with a triple plate if the disks are still the same diameter as a twin disk.looks like just more weight. Especially if, as is, twins can hold a **** load of torque.. Too much power for a twin?.............</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yep you will hit the limit of a twin disc eventually, but I find it hard to believe you'd really need a triple on a Honda. We were still running an off-the-shelf Nismo Coppermix twin plate when my friend made over 650 ft-lbs of torque to the wheels in his GTR without any slip, so I wonder if this is necisary.
either way, thats the reason for going with a triple plate if the disks are still the same diameter as a twin disk.looks like just more weight. Especially if, as is, twins can hold a **** load of torque.. Too much power for a twin?.............</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yep you will hit the limit of a twin disc eventually, but I find it hard to believe you'd really need a triple on a Honda. We were still running an off-the-shelf Nismo Coppermix twin plate when my friend made over 650 ft-lbs of torque to the wheels in his GTR without any slip, so I wonder if this is necisary.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tokesGTR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Yep you will hit the limit of a twin disc eventually, but I find it hard to believe you'd really need a triple on a Honda. We were still running an off-the-shelf Nismo Coppermix twin plate when my friend made over 650 ft-lbs of torque to the wheels in his GTR without any slip, so I wonder if this is necisary.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Take the measurements of the GTR and the Honda clutchs...I tend to doubt they use the same diameter discs. And then when you factor in surface area and the effects of torque when applied further from the centerline, you'll understand. When you're running big enough slicks and a suspension modded to plant the car under load, you'll further understand.
Yep you will hit the limit of a twin disc eventually, but I find it hard to believe you'd really need a triple on a Honda. We were still running an off-the-shelf Nismo Coppermix twin plate when my friend made over 650 ft-lbs of torque to the wheels in his GTR without any slip, so I wonder if this is necisary.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Take the measurements of the GTR and the Honda clutchs...I tend to doubt they use the same diameter discs. And then when you factor in surface area and the effects of torque when applied further from the centerline, you'll understand. When you're running big enough slicks and a suspension modded to plant the car under load, you'll further understand.
Looks great and all, but having a clutch that can handle 3 times the amount of torque you are making is a good way to break trannies! A little slip on the clutch is when keeps the trans together....
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HiProfile »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Take the measurements of the GTR and the Honda clutchs...I tend to doubt they use the same diameter discs. And then when you factor in surface area and the effects of torque when applied further from the centerline, you'll understand. When you're running big enough slicks and a suspension modded to plant the car under load, you'll further understand.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Pretty similar actually, I have my OS giken twin plate sitting in the garage next to a clutchmasters stage 1 for my buddies ITR and there isn't a drastic difference in size.
And DR's on a a GTR will hook better than slicks can on a FWD car, so I'm going to say no to the traction being an issue. I've cut 1.70 short times in a GTR with winter tires mounted on it.
Take the measurements of the GTR and the Honda clutchs...I tend to doubt they use the same diameter discs. And then when you factor in surface area and the effects of torque when applied further from the centerline, you'll understand. When you're running big enough slicks and a suspension modded to plant the car under load, you'll further understand.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Pretty similar actually, I have my OS giken twin plate sitting in the garage next to a clutchmasters stage 1 for my buddies ITR and there isn't a drastic difference in size.
And DR's on a a GTR will hook better than slicks can on a FWD car, so I'm going to say no to the traction being an issue. I've cut 1.70 short times in a GTR with winter tires mounted on it.
I'm not talking about 1st gear launching from the line, I mean 4th gear at 140+ pushing more torque than your GTR came stock for horsepower. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand even a FWD with a trick suspension can't launch with a shitton of power.
If you look at a LS1 clutch, there isnt' a 'drastic' visual size increase either, but a clutch is a function of surface area, diameter, and pressure. 3x the surface area placed 33% closer to the hub will end up holding little more (if not less) than the bigger plate. I recall an article at one of the clutch maker's websites that had all the formulas, but trust me when I say a 'measly' 25% increase in diameter can work out to 100% more capacity.
If you look at a LS1 clutch, there isnt' a 'drastic' visual size increase either, but a clutch is a function of surface area, diameter, and pressure. 3x the surface area placed 33% closer to the hub will end up holding little more (if not less) than the bigger plate. I recall an article at one of the clutch maker's websites that had all the formulas, but trust me when I say a 'measly' 25% increase in diameter can work out to 100% more capacity.





