Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2002 | 09:20 PM
  #1  
Ferrell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,853
Likes: 0
From: CRW
Default JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!?

Stopped at walmart after work one night and was looking through mags and picked up the new "Turbo" mag..... they test the jg edlebrock intake mani and said they gained 41 whp.. anyone else see this? I didnt read about it, so i dont know what setup they hab...just wondering if anyone knows the whole story...and if it is true or not.

:edit: btw...this test was on an R


[Modified by Yes it's VTEC, 6:22 AM 5/22/2002]
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 09:22 PM
  #2  
Rguy's Avatar
Voted Best Looking GDD Poster
25 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,185
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (Yes it's VTEC)

NO fing way. wonder how much JG paid them to do that test.

here is the article. http://www.turbomagazine.com/archive...2_tech01.shtml


cliff notes. ITR has cams and JG header and probably more mods. baselines 193 HP, after manifold nets 205 but looses 2 lb/ft of torque. They also did the mod to a turbo GSR and said this "At around 7450 rpm, we were amazed to see an increase of 41.5 hp and 29.3 lb-ft of torque.
"


[Modified by Rguy, 10:29 PM 5/21/2002]
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 09:22 PM
  #3  
Ferrell's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,853
Likes: 0
From: CRW
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (Rguy)

haha thats what i was wondering....
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 09:27 PM
  #4  
Yellow Dragon's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 1
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (Yes it's VTEC)

It IS Turbo magazine...hell, maybe they installed a turbo while they were at it. hehe.
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 10:09 PM
  #5  
FSTASNTZ's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (Todd C)

The only reason it made more NA peak power is that it held the torque curve longer. Is that due to flow?


Jason
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 10:11 PM
  #6  
JDMPARTS4U's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: NORTHERN California
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (Todd C)

that does seem too good to be true but what the heck Ima try one and tell yal how it goes first hand
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 10:52 PM
  #7  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (TheRiddler)

That car was weak to begin with.
Id be willing to bet that the power curve looks like utter ***** and just has good
peak numbers. Stay tuned, I'll show you what a REAL power curve looks like.
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 11:07 PM
  #8  
qtiger's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (sgT)

That car was weak to begin with.
Id be willing to bet that the power curve looks like utter ***** and just has good
peak numbers. Stay tuned, I'll show you what a REAL power curve looks like.
Its a peak number manifold. JG says its only goof from 7K-10K.
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 11:27 PM
  #9  
Rain_man's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 1
From: US
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (C5_ALLMOTOR)

If you look on beta.vtec.net, they have a video interview with edelbrock, which shows a pic of the dyno sheet before and after the mani. The graph doesn't show any loss compared to stock at any point in the powerband. Have a look at the video yourself...
Reply
Old May 21, 2002 | 11:59 PM
  #10  
far's Avatar
far
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: usa
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (sgT)

That car was weak to begin with.
Id be willing to bet that the power curve looks like utter ***** and just has good
peak numbers. Stay tuned, I'll show you what a REAL power curve looks like.
how does the sk2 IM compair to the JG? which one would you rather use? thanks
Reply
Old May 22, 2002 | 12:09 AM
  #11  
dLo GSR-stolen-now-WRX's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,351
Likes: 0
From: kyoto sangyo daigaku, kyoto, japan, sometimes bay area CA
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (98tegsr)

turbo has become a ricer mag... look at their "reader's rides"...
Reply
Old May 22, 2002 | 12:37 AM
  #12  
Kelvin96GSR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
From: University of Washington, USA
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (dLo GSR)

the 41 whp was gained on a GSR boosting 20psi seems possible me to me. Anyway the ITR gained 11 hp or something with i/h/e and the manifold.
Reply
Old May 22, 2002 | 01:50 AM
  #13  
sgT's Avatar
sgT
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 8,757
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default Re: JG Edlebrock IM test in the new "Turbo"..... 41 WHP!?!?!? (98tegsr)

skunk2 manifold = ITR manifold for non b16a head.

We dont need one since we got ours when we bought our cars.

ITR manifold is the way to go right now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PSI2HI
Forced Induction
3
Jan 24, 2006 05:48 AM
Redwidow
Forced Induction
4
Jun 18, 2004 11:46 AM
PUSHER
Forced Induction
48
Nov 8, 2003 04:43 PM
zojirushi
Forced Induction
1
Jul 18, 2003 10:36 AM
Snafu-Si
Forced Induction
13
Apr 25, 2002 07:19 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:19 AM.