Just wondering if anyone was running non-staggered, but with different offsets?

 

Nah, you'd at least should have different widths.

 

why would u want to??? either way you will stagger the tires

 

i think he's talking about going with like some +45's or lower up front, and a rear like +58 or higher and running 255's front/back non stagger.. pretty popular setup.



Modified by immortal at 9:14 PM 2/22/2007

 

why non-staggered? doesn't it give you better handling and braking power?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by immortal &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i think he's talking about going with like some +45's or lower up front, and a higher like +58 or higher and running 255's front/back non stagger.. pretty popular setup.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Ahhhh, in that case, I have Sparco NS-IIs in 17x9 +45 all around with 235/45 up front and 255/40 in the back, thanks for asking.

 

yeh, sorry i didnt clearify my question, but thats what i meant, is it okay to run like 17x7.5 + 45 all around w/ 225/40 up front and 245 or 255/45 rears?

 

Sure why not? You're doing the same thing except with smaller wheels, which help clearance.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr. Projekt &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Sure why not? You're doing the same thing except with smaller wheels, which help clearance.</TD></TR></TABLE>

why tho?

yeah you can mount both width on the same size of rims but it there's a optimaized rim width to tire width ratio.

i don't see why you want to do that, except for people running cheap wheels

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LAS2K &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why non-staggered? doesn't it give you better handling and braking power? </TD></TR></TABLE>

not braking power

your front does 75-80 percent of the dirty work, unless you are talking about 9width front and rear(non staggered) vs 7 front 8.5 width(staggered)

 

Obviously he doesn't care enough.

 

i was talking about 9in. such as oh lets say rpf1 9.5 front and rear.

 

The ASM S2000 also runs a non staggered setup, 245/40/17 all the way around. Only the offsets on the wheels are staggered.

 

Only way I won't be staggered is if I was x9 all around.....
One day young ones 1 day......

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 5 Skware &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The ASM S2000 also runs a non staggered setup, 245/40/17 all the way around. Only the offsets on the wheels are staggered.</TD></TR></TABLE>

ASM knows what their doing though

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by S@nt0s &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Only way I won't be staggered is if I was x9 all around.....
One day young ones 1 day...... </TD></TR></TABLE>

same here.

17x9 +42 in all 4, or if i go wide body ill have to get 17x10 +something very low.