s2k + turbo = 320 HP
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: South El Monte, CA, United States

6176RE precision turbo
AEM EMS
675 cc injectors
3" turboback
Spearco FMIC
blow off valve
3mm head gasket
wastegate
comptech flywheel
ACT HD clutch
Had some issues at first but its all good now.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: South El Monte, CA, United States
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Sier »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hi, I don't want to compare the 8th gen Civic Si with a S2000, but there are some 8th Si owners running 375whp with 8.5psi
</TD></TR></TABLE>
You cant compare. Different motors, different kits, etc. Too many variables.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
You cant compare. Different motors, different kits, etc. Too many variables.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Sier »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hi, I don't want to compare the 8th gen Civic Si with a S2000, but there are some 8th Si owners running 375whp with 8.5psi
</TD></TR></TABLE>
And more than likely with a bigger turbo too
</TD></TR></TABLE>
And more than likely with a bigger turbo too
rwd with bigger wheels will register less hp on a dyno than a fwd.. Id bet the engine dyno numbers would be close plus a rwd usually requires less whp to go fast if the weight is similar. Id bet the s2000 would still cut faster 60s and run about the same in the qm.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,024
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by teknoracing »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
You cant compare. Different motors, different kits, etc. Too many variables. </TD></TR></TABLE>
not to mention a diff tune/tuner/ems as well most likely
You cant compare. Different motors, different kits, etc. Too many variables. </TD></TR></TABLE>
not to mention a diff tune/tuner/ems as well most likely
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by STN_Pat »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i'd take 320 rwhp over 375 fwhp anyway !</TD></TR></TABLE>
hey, maybe the dude got alot of stock shares in bridgestone.
hey, maybe the dude got alot of stock shares in bridgestone.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by iam7head »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
hey, maybe the dude got alot of stock shares in bridgestone.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That is really funny !!!!
What Manifold did you use
Any pics.
Nice Numbers !!!!
hey, maybe the dude got alot of stock shares in bridgestone.
</TD></TR></TABLE>That is really funny !!!!
What Manifold did you use
Any pics.
Nice Numbers !!!!
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,024
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by iam7head »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
hey, maybe the dude got alot of stock shares in bridgestone.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
that's what 70+mph rolls are for
and that's what 24.5x8x13 slicks are for as well
hey, maybe the dude got alot of stock shares in bridgestone.
</TD></TR></TABLE>that's what 70+mph rolls are for

and that's what 24.5x8x13 slicks are for as well
We can play the HP game all day. I made 457rwhp on 14lbs and PUMP gas with 9 to 1 cr. So what do you think the car make on 28lbs and c16??? I also ran a 11.3 with bone stock tire, diff and trans
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





