what difference in horsepower ratings could i get from a full exaust system to a axle-back system is there that big of a jump.

 

Unless you have a motor that is going to use said unrestricted airflow, then no, there is going to be little to no difference between stock, an axleback, and a full system.

However, for future planning, I'd get a full system.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Eran &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Unless you have a motor that is going to use said unrestricted airflow, then no, there is going to be little to no difference between stock, an axleback, and a full system.

However, for future planning, I'd get a full system.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Agreed 100%.

If this is going on any 5th or 6th gen honda (as the forum is titled, 92-00) with the exception of the 99/00 Si and the B16 sols, a full exhaust isn't really going to do jack **** for you (neither will an axle back). I mean it might sound nice, and you might pick up a few HP, but D-series motors don't respond well to bolt-ons.

Unless you're working with a non-stock engine.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Eran &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Unless you have a motor that is going to use said unrestricted airflow, then no, there is going to be little to no difference between stock, an axleback, and a full system.

However, for future planning, I'd get a full system.</TD></TR></TABLE>

X2