hp rating on jdm sohc vtec zc...??
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
hp rating on jdm sohc vtec zc...??
jus wondering i bought a eg hatch today for my k swap (coming soon) and it has a jdm sohc vtec zc in it...
i know its basically a z6...
jus wondering exactly what hp/tq rating that motor has....
thanks for the help fellas....
i know its basically a z6...
jus wondering exactly what hp/tq rating that motor has....
thanks for the help fellas....
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
From: Wicked Fah North, Maine, United States
Re: (97spooncivic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 97spooncivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">125 hp... its a crappy motor. Just give it to me and you wont have to worry about it anymore. And dont forget to give me the tranny too 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
no.. Ill give you my z6 with 278k on it and a tranny that grinds like theres no tomorrow. And he can give me teh zc.. kk fair trade
</TD></TR></TABLE>no.. Ill give you my z6 with 278k on it and a tranny that grinds like theres no tomorrow. And he can give me teh zc.. kk fair trade
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Re: (CodyC142)
no.. Ill give you my z6 with 278k on it and a tranny that grinds like theres no tomorrow. And he can give me teh zc.. kk fair trade
dumb
and
dumber
125 hp... its a crappy motor. Just give it to me and you wont have to worry about it anymore. And dont forget to give me the tranny too
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
From: Runnemede, NJ, 08078
Re: hp rating on jdm sohc vtec zc...?? (Jabinya)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jabinya »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I have a ZC too and from what I found it is 128hp.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Damn...a single cam in an Integra? I'll bet that thing flies downhill.
Did you buy it with it? I know some model tegs in other countries came with a single cam.
Damn...a single cam in an Integra? I'll bet that thing flies downhill.
Did you buy it with it? I know some model tegs in other countries came with a single cam.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Re: (Syndacate)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Worst responses ever 
flywheel hp don't mean ****.
Looking at about 90-110 hp at the wheels. As for the tq. I don't know.</TD></TR></TABLE>
thanks man...
flywheel hp don't mean ****.
Looking at about 90-110 hp at the wheels. As for the tq. I don't know.</TD></TR></TABLE>
thanks man...
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,338
Likes: 2
From: Ladson, sc, US
Re: (sykotik sol)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sykotik sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so what is it? 126/98 ish??</TD></TR></TABLE>
exactly!!!!!!
exactly!!!!!!
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Re: (schardbody)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by schardbody »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
exactly!!!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ert? I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not
.
What I can tell you is that it's NOT putting out 98 ft lbs of tq. at the wheels.
exactly!!!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ert? I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not
.What I can tell you is that it's NOT putting out 98 ft lbs of tq. at the wheels.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Re: (Syndacate)
i beg the diff'r..
i happen to watch a stock crx si (z6?) w/ i.h.e
put down 111whp/100wtq
at a brauning motorsports dyno war....
so its possible
im sure majority of d series arent goin to be that high..but i did witness it
i happen to watch a stock crx si (z6?) w/ i.h.e
put down 111whp/100wtq
at a brauning motorsports dyno war....
so its possible
im sure majority of d series arent goin to be that high..but i did witness it
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Re: (sykotik sol)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sykotik sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i beg the diff'r..
i happen to watch a stock crx si (z6?) w/ i.h.e
put down 111whp/100wtq
at a brauning motorsports dyno war....
so its possible
im sure majority of d series arent goin to be that high..but i did witness it </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, I saw a Y8 w/ I/H/E throwing down 169whp @ 124ft lbs tq.
....
(Get where I'm going with this?)
Anyways, 111whp is pretty damn high for a stock Z6 on I/H/E.
i happen to watch a stock crx si (z6?) w/ i.h.e
put down 111whp/100wtq
at a brauning motorsports dyno war....
so its possible
im sure majority of d series arent goin to be that high..but i did witness it
</TD></TR></TABLE>Yeah, I saw a Y8 w/ I/H/E throwing down 169whp @ 124ft lbs tq.
....
(Get where I'm going with this?)
Anyways, 111whp is pretty damn high for a stock Z6 on I/H/E.
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
From: Lost in Southwest, VA
Re: (schardbody)
The best I have found for the numbers on that motor is between 128 and 130hp.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Worst responses ever
flywheel hp don't mean ****.
Looking at about 90-110 hp at the wheels. As for the tq. I don't know.</TD></TR></TABLE>
What the hell are you talking about?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Worst responses ever
flywheel hp don't mean ****.
Looking at about 90-110 hp at the wheels. As for the tq. I don't know.</TD></TR></TABLE>
What the hell are you talking about?
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Re: (LowSlow93Sol)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LowSlow93Sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The best I have found for the numbers on that motor is between 128 and 130hp.
What the hell are you talking about?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Do you have difficulty reading or something? Your flywheel #'s don't mean jack ******* ****.
Your WHP and WTQ are the only numbers that matter.
What the hell are you talking about?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Do you have difficulty reading or something? Your flywheel #'s don't mean jack ******* ****.
Your WHP and WTQ are the only numbers that matter.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Dude, OH
Re: hp rating on jdm sohc vtec zc...?? (I Shot 50 Cent)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by I Shot 50 Cent »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Damn...a single cam in an Integra? I'll bet that thing flies downhill.
Did you buy it with it? I know some model tegs in other countries came with a single cam. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah it came that way. The OEM GSR motor took a poop and the owner slapped the ZC it in before I bought it. 34mpg!
Did you buy it with it? I know some model tegs in other countries came with a single cam. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah it came that way. The OEM GSR motor took a poop and the owner slapped the ZC it in before I bought it. 34mpg!
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
From: Lost in Southwest, VA
Re: (Syndacate)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Do you have difficulty reading or something? Your flywheel #'s don't mean jack ******* ****.
Your WHP and WTQ are the only numbers that matter.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I can read but I'm not so sure about your ability to reason.
bhp and whp are directly correlated. The latter being about 15%(drivetrain loss) less than the former. It is the same exact thing. One number just happens to be whats advertised by the dealer, and the other is what you see on the dyno.
Your WHP and WTQ are the only numbers that matter.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I can read but I'm not so sure about your ability to reason.
bhp and whp are directly correlated. The latter being about 15%(drivetrain loss) less than the former. It is the same exact thing. One number just happens to be whats advertised by the dealer, and the other is what you see on the dyno.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,338
Likes: 2
From: Ladson, sc, US
Re: (Syndacate)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Do you have difficulty reading or something? Your flywheel #'s don't mean jack ******* ****.
Your WHP and WTQ are the only numbers that matter.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
oh man, you really dont know much about automobiles do you.
Do you have difficulty reading or something? Your flywheel #'s don't mean jack ******* ****.
Your WHP and WTQ are the only numbers that matter.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
oh man, you really dont know much about automobiles do you.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Re: (LowSlow93Sol)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LowSlow93Sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I can read but I'm not so sure about your ability to reason.
bhp and whp are directly correlated. The latter being about 15%(drivetrain loss) less than the former. It is the same exact thing. One number just happens to be whats advertised by the dealer, and the other is what you see on the dyno.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I know what the difference is, it's a simple fact is that you can only really base a car's power by its WHP, not its HP. Sure you can do **** like lighter flywheels and **** for less rotational mass on the crank but in the end you're not trying to achieve a higher HP, you're trying to achieve a higher WHP.
Though if you are trying to achieve a higher HP w/ no intentions of achieving a higher WHP, why are you upgrading your car?
I can read but I'm not so sure about your ability to reason.
bhp and whp are directly correlated. The latter being about 15%(drivetrain loss) less than the former. It is the same exact thing. One number just happens to be whats advertised by the dealer, and the other is what you see on the dyno.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I know what the difference is, it's a simple fact is that you can only really base a car's power by its WHP, not its HP. Sure you can do **** like lighter flywheels and **** for less rotational mass on the crank but in the end you're not trying to achieve a higher HP, you're trying to achieve a higher WHP.
Though if you are trying to achieve a higher HP w/ no intentions of achieving a higher WHP, why are you upgrading your car?
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
From: Lost in Southwest, VA
Re: (Syndacate)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I know what the difference is, it's a simple fact is that you can only really base a car's power by its WHP, not its HP. Sure you can do **** like lighter flywheels and **** for less rotational mass on the crank but in the end you're not trying to achieve a higher HP, you're trying to achieve a higher WHP.
Though if you are trying to achieve a higher HP w/ no intentions of achieving a higher WHP, why are you upgrading your car?</TD></TR></TABLE>
WOW you're a genius. I wasn't talking about mods and neither was the OP. I'm not really sure where you got all this "if you mod your car but still dont gain any power, why are you modding it in the first place?" ****.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sykotik sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i know its basically a z6...
jus wondering exactly what hp/tq rating that motor has....
thanks for the help fellas....</TD></TR></TABLE>
Stock motor buddy, got that? No lightend flywheel, no underdrive pullies, none of that stuff that reduces the drive train loss and therefore gives you more wheel horse power.
Stop trying to make things harder than they really are.
Though if you are trying to achieve a higher HP w/ no intentions of achieving a higher WHP, why are you upgrading your car?</TD></TR></TABLE>
WOW you're a genius. I wasn't talking about mods and neither was the OP. I'm not really sure where you got all this "if you mod your car but still dont gain any power, why are you modding it in the first place?" ****.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sykotik sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i know its basically a z6...
jus wondering exactly what hp/tq rating that motor has....
thanks for the help fellas....</TD></TR></TABLE>
Stock motor buddy, got that? No lightend flywheel, no underdrive pullies, none of that stuff that reduces the drive train loss and therefore gives you more wheel horse power.
Stop trying to make things harder than they really are.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,338
Likes: 2
From: Ladson, sc, US
Re: (Syndacate)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I know what the difference is, it's a simple fact is that you can only really base a car's power by its WHP, not its HP. Sure you can do **** like lighter flywheels and **** for less rotational mass on the crank but in the end you're not trying to achieve a higher HP, you're trying to achieve a higher WHP.
Though if you are trying to achieve a higher HP w/ no intentions of achieving a higher WHP, why are you upgrading your car?</TD></TR></TABLE>
you do realize that WHP and Chp are the same thing right??? the numbers will be differant, but thats it.
no matter what, if the Chp is raised the WHP will be raised by the same percentage, SO WHY THE HELL DOES CHP not mean ****????
HP measured at the crank is usually what the manufacturers use when they dyno a motor, so comparing chp to chp on 2 seperate vehicles WILL be a valid comparison. taking them measurements and factoring in the loss through the wheels is the same as WHP. now go hit a deer or something.
I know what the difference is, it's a simple fact is that you can only really base a car's power by its WHP, not its HP. Sure you can do **** like lighter flywheels and **** for less rotational mass on the crank but in the end you're not trying to achieve a higher HP, you're trying to achieve a higher WHP.
Though if you are trying to achieve a higher HP w/ no intentions of achieving a higher WHP, why are you upgrading your car?</TD></TR></TABLE>
you do realize that WHP and Chp are the same thing right??? the numbers will be differant, but thats it.
no matter what, if the Chp is raised the WHP will be raised by the same percentage, SO WHY THE HELL DOES CHP not mean ****????
HP measured at the crank is usually what the manufacturers use when they dyno a motor, so comparing chp to chp on 2 seperate vehicles WILL be a valid comparison. taking them measurements and factoring in the loss through the wheels is the same as WHP. now go hit a deer or something.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JapJunkie
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
14
Jul 26, 2004 11:42 PM
preludegofast13
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
11
Jul 22, 2004 01:09 PM
