Which will spool faster?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 03:30 PM
  #1  
Skilz10179's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Livonia, Mi., 48150
Default Which will spool faster?

I'm wondering which of these two turbos would have the faster spool time???

Garrett T3/TO4E, 57 trim compressor and .63 a/r stage 3 wheel turbine

or

Garrett GT3076R with a .82 a/r turbine

Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #2  
SwappedTURBOegg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 1
From: MI
Default Re: Which will spool faster? (Skilz10179)

lol you dont own a honda
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #3  
Skilz10179's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Livonia, Mi., 48150
Default Re: Which will spool faster? (SwappedTURBOegg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SwappedTURBOegg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lol you dont own a honda</TD></TR></TABLE>

Actually I do. My new whip......

Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 03:51 PM
  #4  
SwappedTURBOegg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 1
From: MI
Default

good ****. whats done to it or will be done to it. keeping the cav?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 04:12 PM
  #5  
Finland's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix Arizona
Default

dear fellow xceeders....my bet is on the .63 AR unit.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 04:26 PM
  #6  
TIGboy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: dearborn, Michigan, USA
Default Re: (Mr. Helsinki)

xceed sorry,... the 63 will spool faster but make less power than the 3076.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 05:10 PM
  #7  
92HB_HB's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
From: I am Paypal Verified
Default Re: (TIGboy)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TIGboy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">xceed sorry,... the 63 will spool faster but make less power than the 3076.</TD></TR></TABLE>
x2
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 08:34 AM
  #8  
Skilz10179's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Livonia, Mi., 48150
Default Re: (92HB_HB)

I currently have a T3/TO4E, 57 trim compressor and a .63 a/r stage 3 wheel turbine. It spools around 3000 - 3300rpm , which is perfectly fine with me. I have been considering upgrading to a GT3076R for a while now but i'm really not sure what turbine to go with, the .63 or .82. I know a GT3076R with the same size turbine (.63) i have on my current turbo will spool faster due to the BB center section but i've been wondering for a while how much would moving up to a .82 a/r turbine effect it?

I'm really looking for anyone who has done this exact upgrade that can tell me their results from real world experiance.

Thanks for all the responces so far, keep them coming.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 08:39 AM
  #9  
quicksol95's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, MD
Default Re: (Skilz10179)

you only get like 300 to 500 quicker spool time from a bb turbo
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 08:44 AM
  #10  
spoolin turbo s's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: gate city, VA, usa
Default Re: (quicksol95)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by quicksol95 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you only get like 300 to 500 quicker spool time from a bb turbo</TD></TR></TABLE>

its not just that its the responsiveness of the turbo and how well the turbo stays spooled between shifts
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #11  
N20civicB18's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,348
Likes: 1
From: RI, USA
Default Re: (spoolin turbo s)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by spoolin turbo s &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

its not just that its the responsiveness of the turbo and how well the turbo stays spooled between shifts </TD></TR></TABLE>

Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 11:45 AM
  #12  
SwappedTURBOegg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,499
Likes: 1
From: MI
Default

what if your shifting a automatic? lol
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 11:52 AM
  #13  
TS4L's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: Billings, MT, 59105
Default Re: (SwappedTURBOegg)

I don't own a honda either but I have had both those turbo's and I say if you can afford it the 3076 is awesome. I have an Sr20 an dat 16 psi I made 407hp and had full boost at 4100 rpm's. I also with the help of the cams I have hold torque from 4000-redline which makes for a very fun car. The most noticable difference is the transient response between shifts. You'll have fun with either but the 3076 is my vote. My T3/T4's haven't ever lasted long either. My 3076 is 3 years old at 400 hp and still spools like new. I think that is another advantage with BB but you have to pay for what you get.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Humble Performance
Drag Racing
30
Nov 28, 2006 06:12 PM
oxSLEEPERxo
Forced Induction
6
May 7, 2006 06:54 PM
Quickgti1.8t
Forced Induction
6
May 1, 2006 04:31 AM
B18CXr
Forced Induction
6
Jul 21, 2005 01:34 PM
h22turbolude
Honda Prelude
12
Dec 10, 2003 08:39 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:17 AM.