lower control arms
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok, Thailand
lower control arms
take a look at these:
http://www.jhpusa.com/catalog/...=1038
also i've found others with a solid piece. my question is, how do the struts bolt up to a solid piece?
with the stock lower control arms on my 95 civic, the metal spreads at that point and the strut drops down into the middle, then the bolt travels through.
would the strut with these aftermarket ones, just bolt up on the inside of that solid piece, does not seem right, comments ?
http://www.jhpusa.com/catalog/...=1038
also i've found others with a solid piece. my question is, how do the struts bolt up to a solid piece?
with the stock lower control arms on my 95 civic, the metal spreads at that point and the strut drops down into the middle, then the bolt travels through.
would the strut with these aftermarket ones, just bolt up on the inside of that solid piece, does not seem right, comments ?
a/k/a Jomo
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,275
Likes: 0
Re: lower control arms (superbangkok)
Those arms have the exact same three bushing mounts and rear sway bar mount as a stock rear lower control arm. I am failing to see your question. They are bolt-in, just lighter.
Help we my pennies
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,411
Likes: 0
From: 08854, NJ
Re: lower control arms (superbangkok)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by superbangkok »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">mine look like the ones on the left side in your picture, am i screwed ?</TD></TR></TABLE> ur fucked.. the left is itr lca.. u need the right side for 92-00 civic
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Re: lower control arms (superbangkok)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by superbangkok »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">mine look like the ones on the left side in your picture, am i screwed ?</TD></TR></TABLE>
no, not really. Just don't get blingy rear LCAs. The only problem with having the ITR rear LCAs is that you will have less choices when you have to get new rear shocks. If you're dead set on getting blingy rear LCAs and you want to keep the ITR rear shocks Function 7 makes them for the ITR.
no, not really. Just don't get blingy rear LCAs. The only problem with having the ITR rear LCAs is that you will have less choices when you have to get new rear shocks. If you're dead set on getting blingy rear LCAs and you want to keep the ITR rear shocks Function 7 makes them for the ITR.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 1
From: Vanier, On, Canada
Re: lower control arms (nonsense)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nonsense »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
no, not really. Just don't get blingy rear LCAs. The only problem with having the ITR rear LCAs is that you will have less choices when you have to get new rear shocks. If you're dead set on getting blingy rear LCAs and you want to keep the ITR rear shocks Function 7 makes them for the ITR.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yup....except, ALL LCAs off JDM EGs and DCs are like that, not just JDM itrs
no, not really. Just don't get blingy rear LCAs. The only problem with having the ITR rear LCAs is that you will have less choices when you have to get new rear shocks. If you're dead set on getting blingy rear LCAs and you want to keep the ITR rear shocks Function 7 makes them for the ITR.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yup....except, ALL LCAs off JDM EGs and DCs are like that, not just JDM itrs
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
relentlesstech
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
30
Mar 4, 2014 03:09 PM