in the junk yard i found a 92 95 sedan and it had disc in the rear .so i want to put this on my friends 95 coupe this should work but what i want to know is the l.c.a look bent and his dose not look bent is it because of the stock sway bar on the sedan? any tips on the whole thing would be great!! thanks for your help!!


Modified by boston's_rex at 12:43 PM 8/22/2006


Modified by boston's_rex at 12:45 PM 8/22/2006

 

"maby a dum qustion"

Well, you managed to spell "a" correctly. Congrats

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Archidictus &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">"maby a dum qustion"

Well, you managed to spell "a" correctly. Congrats </TD></TR></TABLE>

lmaomlomao222oahhaaha

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boston’s_rex &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">in the junk yard i found a 92 95 sadan and it had disc in the rear .so i want to put this on my friends 95 coupe this should work but what i want to know is the l.c.a look bent and his dose not look bent is it because of the stock sway bar on the sadan? any tips on the whole thing would be great!! thanks for your help!!</TD></TR></TABLE>

sadan = sedan

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boston’s_rex &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">in the junk yard i found a 92 95 sadan and it had disc in the rear .so i want to put this on my friends 95 coupe this should work but what i want to know is the l.c.a look bent and his dose not look bent is it because of the stock sway bar on the sadan? any tips on the whole thing would be great!! thanks for your help!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
I don't know why you're concerned about the LCAs, because they have nothing to do with a rear disc conversion.

 

it should fit right? arent the rear trailing arms the same from 92-00 civics?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EeeJayEight &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it should fit right? arent the rear trailing arms the same from 92-00 civics?</TD></TR></TABLE>

you would think so, but from what i have read and heard no because the trailing arm is slightly longer on the sedans than the coupes or hatchbacks.

 

good thing i dont teach spelling for a living i need a l.c.a so if it fit it would be nice.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by philosofy1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you would think so, but from what i have read and heard no because the trailing arm is slightly longer on the sedans than the coupes or hatchbacks.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Wrong. All trailing arms for '88-00 Civic, '88-91 CRX, '90-01 Integra, and '93-97 del Sol are effectively identical, regardless of trim, body style, or brakes ('90-93 Integras actually use a larger diameter TA bushing, but that is irrelevent).

Hence the reason trailing arms are not required for a rear disc conversion either. All you need are the hub assemblies, soft lines, e-brake cables, and calipers/pads/rotors. I also recommend the proper proportioning valve for your application.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boston’s_rex &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i need a l.c.a so if it fit it would be nice.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why?

 

broke a bolt when doing the shocks on his car i got the car back together but its not right so i need the l.c.a.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Targa250R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Wrong. All trailing arms for '88-00 Civic, '88-91 CRX, '90-01 Integra, and '93-97 del Sol are effectively identical, regardless of trim, body style, or brakes ('90-93 Integras actually use a larger diameter TA bushing, but that is irrelevent).

Hence the reason trailing arms are not required for a rear disc conversion either. All you need are the hub assemblies, soft lines, e-brake cables, and calipers/pads/rotors. I also recommend the proper proportioning valve for your application.


Why?</TD></TR></TABLE>

good to know, thanks!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boston’s_rex &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">broke a bolt when doing the shocks on his car i got the car back together but its not right so i need the l.c.a.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I am assuming the two different LCAs are the ones that are pictured here?



If so, go ahead and grab the LCA from the donor car. If not, then the donor LCA is probably bent. However, if the receiving car is not using a rear sway bar, you can just use the LCA from the donor's opposite side, and flip it around backwards.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by philosofy1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">good to know, thanks! </TD></TR></TABLE>
Keep in mind that while the trailing arms are the same (except for the DA bushing difference noted), compensator arms and LCAs are not.

 

17 looks like his, and 19 looks like the bent one . why is it bent?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boston’s_rex &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">17 looks like his, and 19 looks like the bent one . why is it bent?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I figure they were just designed that way to accomodate the sway bar mounting point, likely to position it on the edge where it is thicker. It is effectively the same arm though (all bushings are the same and in the same relative locations), so you can use it.

 

thankyou for your replys and to everyone, I should have been more careful when posting on here. I will try not to miss spell anything again, I am not good at spelling sorry.

 

17 does NOT have the sway bar bolt hole.