i know their different in the way they work, but they both try to accomplish the same goal. better handling. which do you think does it bettER?

 

well atts work in the front and 4ws in the back. the atts is actually something like an electronic LSD transfering the trq from side to side to accomplish better traction. The 4ws is made for smoother highway ride and for tight cornering.

I personaly have a 4th gen with 4ws and LSD and i couldn't ask for a better combo

 

^^Agreed with all above stated.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Buffalo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">a 4th gen with 4ws and LSD and i couldn't ask for a better combo </TD></TR></TABLE>

Would be nice, only if you can keep the 4ws working though.

Otherwise it's just dead weight..

 

4WS and Quaife

 

Between the two, I would say the ATTS was the better invention. Ultimate combo, I would have to say is the new RL; AWD with ATTS. The next best is the 4th Gen the Quaife with 4WS is the best combo.

 

^^But there's a problem with the ATTS.. It can only handle up to a certain amount of HP/TQ then it's useless..

Not to mention all the problems with having to get different parts just because it's an SH.

 

BTW I was thinking of picking up a red 93 si 4ws for 4500$ from a dealership, i'm not sure if I should tho.. hmmm. I loved my old 92 si so much, i don't know if i can pass this up ;d

 

Is it just me or does that seem like a shitload of money for a 93 si? 4500?

hmmmm.

 

yea i agree, but i live in the bay area and everything is overpriced here. I see a lot of 92-95 vtec's going forlike 5500-6000, its pretty ridiculous. especially when its like "1992 Prelude vtech fast!!" lol