im having trouble deciding which is a better short shifter,either a b&m short shifter, or a skunk2 short shifter, if anyone has had experience with these plz give some feed back.thanks.
-PinoyCivic

 

I've used and own both of those shifters. With the B&M you have to use the bushing from the stock shifter so that it doesn't wobble when you install it. The skunk2 just sits in fine. I personally like the skunk2 better, it sits slightly lower. But other than that they both did the same thing for me. Enjoy.

 

I like my Skunk 2......No complaints......Really cant go wrong either way.......

 

skunk2>B&M

easily said

 

skunk2 will surely be the better shortshifter, but b&m is up there to...i have the b&m and love it...though if i had the bushings for energy, my shifts would be alot better...if you've got the money get the skunk2 but if your want to save some money...get the B&M..

 

id go with the skunk2 with the anniversary shift ****

 

what about the buddyclub short shifter? i was told that one was good too.

 

pace setter = adjust how short you want your shift to be. B&M doesn't have that, nor does skunk 2 to my knowledge...

 

dont forget your poly bushings

 

skunk2 personnaly is better, i driven both, and i like the skunk2 better !

 

i got rid of both my skunk n' b&m for a c's... the throw seemed better with the c's