Which is a better overall car?
2000 si or 1994 integra gsr
not just speed overall everything?

 

newer cars are always the best bet, but another factor is how badly where the both cars beat on by there previous owners. integra and gsr in the same sentence should tell you most likely it was driven (for real) and not babied.

just my .02

 

newer car less tear and wear

 

Are they in the same price bracket? If so, then the 2000 SI.

 

I like the Si. That is my personal opinion. I just like the looks, inside and out. I really don't know why, I have always loved them. The GSR is faster, and some have leather interior, but I think why they don't appeal to me as much as the Si, is because there are so many of them around.

 

Between your two choices, I would choose the Si because it's newer. Newer cars are always better. If the GSR was also a 2000 (or even a 98+), then I would choose the GSR.

Acuras are "better" than Hondas because they are it's luxury division. Interior is nicer, everything looks a bit nicer and feels a bit nicer.

 

GSR with JDM front period.

 

gsr. better motor, better chassis. new doesn't mean ****. a 94 gsr driven by a 50 year old man is probably going to be in a hell of a lot better shape than an 00 SI that was a 16th bday present for some kid 5 years ago.

moral of the story; check them both out and get what you want instead of asking teh intraweb.

 

I already own the 1994 integra gsr. just asking to see what others opinions are.
But how much you looking to spend
I have a 1994 gsr 2dr 113k miles on it black 5spd. aem cai, apexi n1 catback exhaust, and dc sport 4-2-1 headers and a no name rear strut bar. in like perfect condition. Paint is money.

 

i have the gsr if you want to buy it offer me somting.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rahxephon &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">GSR with JDM front period.</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

GSR all the way