making a turbo manifold... QUESTION
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: dearborn, Michigan, USA
alright well, im probably in the future going to be making my turbo manifold for my D-series. Anyway I would like to know where to begin basically, I need a good place to buy piping and flanges, yes ive searched but still dont understand where to start the actual process. Should I draw it out first? get the flanges first etc... Any help/pics would be great, and of course im going to be tigging this.
Thanks guys (sorry if this is a hardcore newb question) Thanks again
-Jon
Thanks guys (sorry if this is a hardcore newb question) Thanks again-Jon
http://www.homemadeturbo.com/f...834.0
Weir is a friend o mine. Great prices Awesome Service. He's on H-T alos, just don't know if he has a for sale thread.
Weir is a friend o mine. Great prices Awesome Service. He's on H-T alos, just don't know if he has a for sale thread.
This is my protoypte idea for my ZC. I am going try to merge 1-3 and 2-4 together instead of 1-2 and 3-4. I wanted to go top mount to be different. If I don't like it, I'll make another.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bumblezc »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">This is my protoypte idea for my ZC. I am going try to merge 1-3 and 2-4 together instead of 1-2 and 3-4. I wanted to go top mount to be different. If I don't like it, I'll make another.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why do you want to merge those cylinders?
Why do you want to merge those cylinders?
Trending Topics
I would be better flowing from everything I've heard. Balances the firing order, that way exhuast gas is not trying to flow through each merge 1 fire cycle right after the other. Creates and more evn and equal flow.
This is what I've been told. I made this pic for representation to get feedback, this is what I've heard so far, and it makes sense to me. This design would work if it fired 1-2-3-4 but our motors don't. 1-3-4-2 if I remeber correctly from the last time I did valve lash.
This is what I've been told. I made this pic for representation to get feedback, this is what I've heard so far, and it makes sense to me. This design would work if it fired 1-2-3-4 but our motors don't. 1-3-4-2 if I remeber correctly from the last time I did valve lash.
1-3-4-2 is correct. Typically you want to pair opposing cylinders, ex 1-4 3-2. On a 4-1 merge collector the position of the runners is important as well just fyi.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cua0 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thread the manifold flange ;p</TD></TR></TABLE>
How the hell would that work?
How the hell would that work?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by daveG »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You're not gonna be able to get any nuts on the manifold studs with the tubing like that.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
As I said this is for a visual only. They are 1.5 304SS Bend like everyone else. Tey are not crushed in the pic. It will work
</TD></TR></TABLE>As I said this is for a visual only. They are 1.5 304SS Bend like everyone else. Tey are not crushed in the pic. It will work
why not have it merge the other way and not have piece from runner 2 go into runner 1, but the other way around so the exaust flows into the turbo more directly, it would be like the short tubulars you see kinda, or would this not make any difference at all lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




