VAFC Vs. Chip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 07:36 PM
  #1  
xagix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: South County, xxx
Default VAFC Vs. Chip

This might sound like a stupid question but what's people opinions on the VAFC vs. Chipping.

I have a b16 in my EF and, I believe the Ecu is a pw0. A buddy of mine has a vtec controller in his CRX and he was telling me it's a good way to up the fuel and air adjustments. He also said its gas efficient on the freeway setting his vtec at a higher RPM.

On the other hand another buddy of mine has a "chipped" ecu in his CRX rich makes his car pretty quick compared to my stock b16.

Well my question is which way is the better way to go if what i'm looking for is making my car a little quicker? And what well be the cheaper way?

I'm asking for input and opinions. thank you.


p.s. I'm fairly new to Hondas and I'm new to Honda Tech. I did search to see if this topic has been covered and I got zero results.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #2  
xagix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: South County, xxx
Default Re: VAFC Vs. Chip (xagi-kneex)

xbumpdigityx
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 08:26 AM
  #3  
blah13's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Default Re: VAFC Vs. Chip (xagi-kneex)

Chipping is cheaper and less hassle...generaslly you send off your ecu with a list..what motor you have, set-up, mods, etc and whomever you send it to does your chip. You get it back, you plug it in, your done. But anytime to make a major setup change, turbo, nitrous etc back off your ecu goes.

However, a VAFC will give you much more versatility, and it can be tuned to your liking. Plus a VAFC allows you to re-tune at anytime if you ever change your setup, plus a VAFC is universal, you can swap out to a D series/H series and still use it. However major setup changes = dyno/tuning time which = $.

Chip = cheap, easy
VAFC = more $, more versatile, better overall
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 08:46 AM
  #4  
CRX Toad's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,638
Likes: 1
From: Near Charlotte
Default Re: VAFC Vs. Chip (blah13)

I'd have to say chip it.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #5  
bahraini civic's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Sanad, bahrain
Default Re: VAFC Vs. Chip (CRX Toad)

i d say chip the thing better
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 10:26 AM
  #6  
Malgerus's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,723
Likes: 1
From: BC
Default Re: VAFC Vs. Chip (bahraini civic)

Chip it and do your own editing with BRE, Crome, or Uberdata. Buy yourself a cheap rom burner like a willems and go nuts. Screw paying people to burn programs for you, do it yourself. Go to http://www.pgmfi.org, read, and learn.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #7  
xagix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: South County, xxx
Default Re: VAFC Vs. Chip (Mr. S)

Thank you I'm less confused now. If I decide to chip it myself I am really clueless on tuning options. What exactly is "Uberdata" and "Hondata"? How much wil chipping cost overall If I do it? Or have someone else do it?

Thank you guys for all your help!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Suck my DX
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
9
May 17, 2005 06:23 AM
nevin
Tech / Misc
5
Aug 14, 2003 09:15 PM
kHoA DoGG
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
Oct 26, 2002 03:59 PM
EJK
Tech / Misc
5
Apr 14, 2002 12:55 PM
REDBARON
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
5
Feb 6, 2002 07:33 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 PM.