Fuel parts for turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 08:51 PM
  #1  
Anubyss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default Fuel parts for turbo

How important is gettinga fuel pump, fpr, and a fuel rail when getting a turbo that will not run above 8psi for now. Is it a 'piece of mind' thing or is it needed. I am just trying to cut cost as I am over $6000 already in parts alone for this turbo setup. This is what I am thinking of getting if I really need it:

Walbro 255 ltr/hr high pressure inline pump
Aeromotive FPR
AEM fuel rail

I would appreciate any info.


[Modified by Anubyss, 5:52 AM 2/14/2002]
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 09:17 PM
  #2  
Giuseppe's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Default Re: Fuel parts for turbo (Anubyss)

I am over $6000 already in parts alone for this turbo setup.
u spent all that money and dont have a fuel pump yet.???
man o man...please get one...
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 09:26 PM
  #3  
cyan1de's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Default Re: Fuel parts for turbo (Anubyss)

you dont necessarily needa fuel rail, but you need a FPR. get an aeromotive or AEM unit
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 09:51 PM
  #4  
1fstevo's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Default Re: Fuel parts for turbo (cyan1de)

what the hell did you spend on with $6000?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 09:56 PM
  #5  
Giuseppe's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Default Re: Fuel parts for turbo ([Evo]Hybrid)

what the hell did you spend on with $6000?
thats what id like to know too...
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 09:57 PM
  #6  
TurboTypeR98's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Default Re: Fuel parts for turbo (cyan1de)

why would he need the fpr? Is he running a standalone?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 10:38 PM
  #7  
Anubyss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Turbo kit, clutch kit, egt gauge, boost gauge, fuel pressure gauge, cams, cam gears, springs, retainer, flywheel, 550cc injectors, standalone. So I guess the fuel rail is not really necessary but the fpr is. Just read about the aeromotive being bare bones, and requiring fittings to put in. So, now the question at hand is if it's actually better than the AEM unit.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 10:52 PM
  #8  
D-SPEED's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: Okayama, Japan
Default Re: (Anubyss)

yes the aeromotive is better than the AEM.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2002 | 11:23 PM
  #9  
1fstevo's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Default Re: (D-SPEED)

How you figure?? Automotive is better than AEM.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 04:42 AM
  #10  
Anubyss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Does anyone with an AEM unit have or had issues with it? Why is the general consensus that the AEM FPR is bad? I believe this bolts right up to the fuel rail while the Aerormotive unit does not. Or am I mistaken on this matter.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 04:48 AM
  #11  
austrian type-R's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,567
Likes: 0
From: official euro R hospital, AUSTRIA
Default Re: (Anubyss)

I use to have the AEM unit 1 year now and it is a good part, never had problem with it.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2002 | 05:58 AM
  #12  
VTC_CiViC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,613
Likes: 1
From: Naples, Fl, USA
Default Re: (austrian type-R)

boostkillz has one on his GS-R, seems to do the job
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JDMCIVIC919
Forced Induction
5
Jan 3, 2012 09:26 PM
GSROWNSU
Forced Induction
3
Jan 27, 2007 08:20 AM
92civiclsb18a
Tech / Misc
2
Jul 3, 2004 02:16 AM
Anubyss
Forced Induction
2
Jan 23, 2002 12:00 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:24 AM.